Originally posted by dadudemon
Could be true, but I'm not too worried about. I was just going along with the joke.
I know.
I was just pointing out their ages, but then this whole pedo thing started.
Interesting how a Bumi vs. Toph thread went to a bending battle between Katara & Azula, to Katara bending over to Azula, to a discussion on Pedophilia.
______
~ That said, Bumi wins. Comics are not counted in my thread 313.
Originally posted by marwash22
semantics! you knew exactly what the point was; flexing your knowledge on the subject of sex with minors is not impressive... it's creepy.
You didn't pay attention to anything I said. 😬
At no point in my post is there any sort of justification. 😬
Also, the JOKE was never about being nasty with minors, it was about those two getting it on. 😐
Originally posted by Nephthys
I'm pretty sure the term is Ephebophile anyways....
You are correct. If we go by DP's guestimate, they would be 17 and 15, respectively. If we go by actual time, they'd be 19 and 17-18.
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
Interesting how a Bumi vs. Toph thread went to a bending battle between Katara & Azula, to Katara bending over to Azula, to a discussion on Pedophilia.______
~ That said, Bumi wins. Comics are not counted in my thread 313.
crylaugh Indeed...the thread did.
And, yes, I agree: no damn comics. Stick to the canon cartoons. 😠
Originally posted by dadudemon"pedophilia" is actually derived from pedo (child). therefore child pubescence is natural and independent of law and social norms even if lust for prepubescent children is legal and considered "normal" in some nations, it's still pedophilia to covet them.
You guys toss around "pedophilia" on anything.Did you guys know that a 40 year old man having sex with a 13 year old girl could NOT be pedophilia? Depends on the sexual maturity of that female.
On the same token, did you guys know that a 20 year old man having sex with a 25 year old woman could be pedophilia? Again, it's based on the sexual maturity. Pedophilia is a sexual attraction to sexually immature people. If a lady hasn't sexually matured, looks..say...10 or 11, but is over 18, a man having sex with her would still be a pedophile if he was attracted to that type of body because it's a state of mind.
On the same token, a 40 year old woman having sex with a 13 year old male, if he is fully sexually mature and looks like a man, she is NOT a pedophile. Not even close.
Again, it is the sexual attraction to perceived age, that constitutes pedophilia or not pedophilia.
Also, in Katara's case, if she is not fully sexually mature, adults being attracted to her would not be pedophilia, it would be ephebophilia or hebephilia.
/psychology lesson.
bhumi stomps
Originally posted by psycho gundam
"pedophilia" is actually derived from pedo (child). therefore child pubescence is natural and independent of law and social norms even if lust for prepubescent children is legal and considered "normal" in some nations, it's still pedophilia to covet them.bhumi stomps
I have no idea what you just tried to say, but pedophilia is the sexual attraction towards prepubescent humans. That's it...nothing else needs to be added to it.
If the human APPEARS prepubescent to the person attracted to that prepubescent human, than it is pedophilia because they don't know the wiser. If you try to justify your "lust" for that prepubescent looking person and they are over 18, it doesn't change the psychological value: it's still pedophilia.
So if you look at a 17 year old chick that looks hotter than lotsa 18+ pornstars you're a pedo? That doesnt make sense, only according to law maybe. And we're talking about animation. Sometimes it hard to tell which characters are 14 and which are 20 in cartoons, especially drawn in "japanese style". For example I think Azula is hot and she was said to be 14 so im a pedo, but if she was said to be 18 but looked exactly the same that'd be just fine?😬
Originally posted by dadudemonno, that would be a loophole to get out of being a pedophile, but it's not pedophilia.
I have no idea what you just tried to say, but pedophilia is the sexual attraction towards prepubescent humans. That's it...nothing else needs to be added to it.If the human APPEARS prepubescent to the person attracted to that prepubescent human, than it is pedophilia because they don't know the wiser. If you try to justify your "lust" for that prepubescent looking person and they are over 18, it doesn't change the psychological value: it's still pedophilia.
pubescence is not about looks, it's sexual maturity of the organs. i know what you're aiming for cause i feel the same way, but in a court of law that person isn't a pedophile as long as the person they are with is of legal age. again, it's like a loophole
Originally posted by psycho gundam
no, that would be a loophole to get out of being a pedophile, but it's not pedophilia.pubescence is not about looks, it's sexual maturity of the organs. i know what you're aiming for cause i feel the same way, but in a court of law that person isn't a pedophile as long as the person they are with is of legal age. again, it's like a loophole
Pubescence is about the looks, the smell, and the perception of the person's mental maturity (there are average reactions that age groups have to specific data and it is measurable. You can percieve someone's maturity/age based off of these reactions. Also, the brain itself can be mapped to an age because it literally changes as you get older.) Humans evolved to pick up on these cues so that we would know, without having to really think about it, who was ready to breed and who was not. Most people mix concurrent societal norms with biology and they shouldn't.
The average lifespan of early man was 18. Guess what? Lots of breeding occurred before 18. Lots of babies were had before 18. What did they have to go off of? Sexual maturity which includes menstruation, armpit hair, pubic hair, fat placement (wider hips, breasts, fuller lips, and fuller face) and body odor. These are the biological markers needed to figure out who is ready to breed and who isn't.
You are correct...people figure out loopholes. That's because there are laws based off of concurrent norms. I don't fault those people for it...unless they are into what I've come to know as "toddlercon"...which is just sick shit and I think it should be illegal. Not even 100 years ago, 13 and 14 year old girls would be given away in marriage to 30-year-old men. What happened? Society happened. Early man...that would be a very good idea, IF the girl was sexually mature and could bare children as a 30-year-old male will be fully physically mature, have developed hunting and protection skills sufficient enough to raise children, etc. etc. etc. That's not pedophilia, that's survival of the fittest at it's best. We don't scoff at 18-year-old male lions breeding with 2-year-old females, do we? Of course not. For some reason, humans have double standards and they make up strange rules and love to enforce those reasons for self-righteous reasons.
My personal preference, however, is voluptuous, full, women. That's something that many young ladies cannot achieve until their late teens early 20s. I just don't like the self-righteous attitudes that I read in here, earlier. It's stupid.