Mace Windu vs. Darth Revan

HWKA: no, because your letters represent variables, not constants.

Originally posted by truejedi
HWKA: no, because your letters represent variables, not constants.

So? Although variables change from equation to equation, they don't change within an equation.

My point is that Mace > Sidious because of Vapaad/shatterpoint/superconducting loop, all of which will also apply to a fight vs Exar Kun.

H, that is why it is OK for this time. You are giving reasons. Usually it is just that Anakin beat Dooku and dooku is teh powerz so anakin will beat EVRY1.

By not being stupid about it you are making it hard for TJ to disagree.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
H, that is why it is OK for this time. You are giving reasons. Usually it is just that Anakin beat Dooku and dooku is teh powerz so anakin will beat EVRY1.

By not being stupid about it you are making it hard for TJ to disagree.

...that's what I'm saying. SOMETIMES A>B>C logic works.

Only this isn't ABC. ABC is as has been explained. This is really just "making a cogent argument" by using "facts" and, later, "sources."

You don't have to call it ABC-- you can just call it "slowly accruing competence."

Right. I don't disagree that sometimes it is TRUE.

But saying that Mace Beat Sidious, and Sidious beat/ tied Yoda is proof positive that Mace will beat/tie Yoda is always false. That is how we use the term ABC logic here generally.