Is this routine innapropriate for 7 year old girls?

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I like how you had to preface that. 😂

It was to make a point by using an example.

Yes, definitely inappropriate. Sexualization of kids is damned creepy at any level but that's really really sickening.

if i was a parent i would not aprove of my 7 year old daughter doing that.

Originally posted by chomperx9
if i was a parent i would not aprove of my 7 year old daughter doing that.

What if she were 18?

It would be legal.

Originally posted by inimalist
i didn't find it sexual

I'm not attracted to children though...

I get your point, and I'm not saying this isn't in some ways worse (though I'm also not saying that we don't coddle youth with regards to sex either), just that it is simply an extension of a trend that has existed for years.

I got about 30 seconds into the vid before I got the point....but you didn't have to go very far into the vid to see pelvic thrusting, which is sexual...and the whole "stripper-esque" routine was kind-of sexual.

edit -

Originally posted by Robtard
The clothing and the way they moved, didn't strike you to do almost stripper-esque?

Don't think you have to be attracted to children to see it as such. I don't find men attractive, but the way Chip & Dales' dancers dress and move is sexual.

Don't get me wrong either, I'm not comparing this to child-rape, it's inappropriate though, at least to me. Disgusting, it was.

hahaha

You used the same term I did: stripper-esque.

So funny.

Originally posted by dadudemon

hahaha

You used the same term I did: stripper-esque.

So funny.

Isn't there already a term for that: burlesque?

Originally posted by Robtard
What if she were 18?

Originally posted by chomperx9
if i was a parent i would not aprove of my 7 year old daughter doing that.

Wait a second friend, that 7 year old might just be a gold mine. Remember the prosti-tots motto: "pedophilies pay top dollar to have sex with children". Our motto used to be a clever euphemism involving lambs but that's no longer necessary.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Isn't there already a term for that: burlesque?

No that's when you're similar to a big muscular guy. Or is that burly-esque?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Wait a second friend, that 7 year old might just be a gold mine. Remember the prosti-tots motto: "pedophilies pay top dollar to have sex with children". Our motto used to be a clever euphemism involving lambs but that's no longer necessary.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
It would be legal.

It would be; I was trying to make that point that as a parent, he'd still likely not approve of his daughter pelvic-thrusting on stage. Not to take away that 7-year-olds shouldn't do that.

Originally posted by chomperx9
i really hope you arent serious there.

Because clearly I represent a company named prosti-tots that openly markets child prostitutes.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Because clearly I represent a company named prosti-tots that openly markets child prostitutes.

Your fault for not using the Sarcmark(tm).

Originally posted by dadudemon
WTF?

Those were little girls dancing like f***in' strippers.

I cannot believe that shit. What happened to being a kid?

However, those girls practiced really really hard for that, and for that, they should be applauded. But they could have at least made the routine more classy and dressed with more clothes.

We agree on something. Next thing you know we will be drinking beer and reciting dirty limericks together.

Someone look under our respective beds for pods.

Hahaha...This thread amuses me...When did you guys get all serious?

Guess it leaves me to say it then....

Well...Don't know about you...But I came.

those girls are a little to young to be dancing around like britney. stuff like that is what attracts child molesters.

Originally posted by you get thorns
We agree on something. Next thing you know we will be drinking beer and reciting dirty limericks together.

Someone look under our respective beds for pods.

lol!

We agree on lots of things.

Originally posted by jaden101
Well...Don't know about you...But I came.

I conetemplated posting that...but...I was just too appalled to make a joke about it. But, yeah, I'm the guy that usually posts "I came" on the most odd times for videos on teh internetz.

I don't think it's really a big deal, the children don't know what sex or even the notion of being sexy is, so to them the dance is innocent...

I think being appaled at this kind of thing is why children are being made conform to the paedo obsessed culture or today. It;s jsut children dancing... It's not sexualising them because neither the children or normal adults should find it sexual.

The only thing I have a problem with is the fact that children are being preasured into these sorts of competitions by pushy parents.

Put it this way... children should be able to do it if they want, simply because to them it's just a fun dance. If some sick pervert finds it attractive that shouldn't be the child's responsibility. I hate this cotton wool culture we live in.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
I don't think it's really a big deal, the children don't know what sex or even the notion of being sexy is, so to them the dance is innocent...

I think being appaled at this kind of thing is why children are being made conform to the paedo obsessed culture or today. It;s jsut children dancing... It's not sexualising them because neither the children or normal adults should find it sexual.

The only thing I have a problem with is the fact that children are being preasured into these sorts of competitions by pushy parents.

Put it this way... children should be able to do it if they want, simply because to them it's just a fun dance. If some sick pervert finds it attractive that shouldn't be the child's responsibility. I hate this cotton wool culture we live in.