This is Darth Vader:
Originally posted by BlackZero30xIn both the novelization and comic adaption of The Force Unleashed, Galen not only blocked/tanked Palpatine's force lightning for a bit, but he also managed to advance forward against it (enough to actually grab Palpatine by his wrists.) That in itself is a gargantuan feat... A feat that not even Yoda himself was capable of.
i think that's accurate but a little off.....I don't after beating the game on the light side you see marek makes a fairly good match for the Emperor.im not saying he's better or even equal im just saying that he's close.
Originally posted by Galan007I'd imagine a lightsaber would work.I have never seen/read of a lightsaber failing to cut through a metal or skin.Just things like forcefields and other lightsabers.
The only attack Palpatine has in his arsenal which might harm Darkseid are the force storms he used in Dark Empire. Other then that, I can't imagine Darkseid doing anything but laughing at Palpatine's attempts.It would be an odd twist of irony, though... The absolute lord and master of the dark side, owned by Darkseid. Heh.
I hope you aren't being serious.
Cool, I agree fo sho.
But imo, even IF Tony did have one of his more recent armors in this battle, Vader would still take the majority. /shrug
Yeah really.
Originally posted by Galan007
In both the novelization and comic adaption of The Force Unleashed, Galen not only blocked/tanked Palpatine's force lightning for a bit, but he also managed to advance forward against it (enough to actually grab Palpatine by his wrists.) That in itself is a gargantuan feat... A feat that not even Yoda himself was capable of.
I have the GN and i want the book...are they basically the same?
Originally posted by marwash22Why not?
lightsaber > anything Stark has in the classic suit.Scientifically speaking, a lightsaber shouldn't even work.
Originally posted by marwash22Nothing with definite more killability.More versitility but not more dangerous.
Excellent rebuttal. What does Stark (in the classic suit) have that's better than a lightsaber?
Not sure what you are asking.
Are you asking what is the more destructive weapon? What do I value about the suit more than a lightsaber? The thing is more durable than a tank, flies faster than military jets, and packs enough firepower to wipe out any kind of STU regiment you put in front of it.
Originally posted by Black bolt zI'd be alot more scared of someone coming at me in the suit than someone wielding the lightsaber. No comparison.
More versitility but not more dangerous.
Originally posted by marwash22They aren't magical...I know in the STU they are powered by crystals(i forget the specifics as I have not brushed up on SW in a while).Scientifically the best possible option is superheated plasma.
The entire reason lightsabers work is because they are magical... scientifically, they don't work at all 'cause it's impossible to control a laser in that manner.^ that's why nothing Tony has in the classic armor is better than a lightsaber.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
A full regiment?Not a chance.And a single slightsaber vs. the suit no but with vaders powerset would take lightsaber first.
Given a choice between force powers and Iron Man armor I'd take force powers but given a choice between IM armor and lightsaber I'd take IM armor, no contest.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
They aren't magical...I know in the STU they are powered by crystals(i forget the specifics as I have not brushed up on SW in a while).Scientifically the best possible option is superheated plasma.
Originally posted by Omega VisionI meant if given vaders powerset and a lightsaber of IM armor which would you choose?I go with vader.
Having a Lightsaber doesn't automatically give you force powers.Given a choice between force powers and Iron Man armor I'd take force powers but given a choice between IM armor and lightsaber I'd take IM armor, no contest.