Originally posted by Galan007
I mean, do I think Qui-Gon could have given Sidious any sort of prolonged fight (as he did with Maul)? Hell no. Do I think Obi-Wan as a Padawan could get in any good shots on Sidious (as he did with Maul)? Hell no -- especially when RotS-Obi-Wan outright stated that even he and Yoda combined would be no match for him. Do I think Maul could have slew 3 of "the greatest swordsmen the Order has ever produced" with a ridiculous degree of ease, AND matched a Vaapad-empowered Mace blow for blow (as Sidious did)? Hell no.(Btw, I know you never claimed Maul = Sidious, but I figured it was only a matter of time until someone tried lol.)
Prolonged fight or not, Maul dominated the fight with Qui-Gon, directing the action and determining the course of the fight actively (as elaborated on in the novel.) And all I can say is that the movie showing of Obi-Wan's brief spat with him was an aberration. I mean, Qui-Gon is a master swordsman in his own right and presumably better than a padawan who copied his style, right? I don't understand the choreography behind that, especially when Maul did better 2 against 1 than 1 on 1, but whatever.
He still tooled Darth Vader canonically. awesome
Originally posted by Galan007
Kas'im, on the other hand, was not only a confirmed master of every form of lightsaber combat, but he also tooled Bane as though he were a talentless feeb... Now that's sumthin rite thuur.
If Kas'im opts for using Jar'Kai immediately, the fight might end pretty quick. But otherwise, I don't see it being easy for him to win - although I do agree that, in the end, Kas'im takes it.