Originally posted by NemeBro
I was that insolent white boy, Dark-Jaxx/God-Eneru.
Oh hey, Dark-Jaxx! I remember you. I was wondering what had happened to you. Yeah, you should come back. There is quite a bit of drama you've missed out on since you left.
Originally posted by Astner
Judging by the prolonged response you've provided thus far and the fact that four member registered just so they could respond is evidence enough to dismiss this accusation.
I'm merely entertaining myself, and the others haven't even been back.
The reason for why you can't go into a more "in-depth argument" isn't because you don't care. It's because you haven't read the manga. You said it yourself, in this very post.
Not exactly. There were aspects of you method of reviewing that I took issue with, and not the review itself. As I said, you are entitled to your opinion, but people can disagree with an opinion based upon said opinion's foundations.
In other words your defending a position out of bias. It's not that you dissagree with the review, it's that you dissagree with me and my right to exercise my free speach. I don't know if it's an unsettled dispute you couldn't drop but I see no point in entertaining your pitiful sharade. Leave this thread to people who have read the manga.
Appeal to motive fallacy: a pattern of argument which consists in challenging a thesis by calling into question the motives of its proposer.
By saying I am biased, you are guilty of this fallacy.
And I never pretended to have read it. Besides, it was your methods that I disagreed with.
Once again, it's a review not an opinion post. I didn't write "the art isn't to my taste" I wrote (paraphrasing) "the art is horrible and here is why" and provided pictures compelling people to make their own opinions of the art.
You posted reasoning for why you believe the artwork to be poor. Others my find themselves liking it. While better than saying "The art is terrible" it is still an opinion.
You was addressing the work, not me in person, more importantly you didn't address my work in specific but the general process of reviewing.I read and I quote:
If anything that's a selfish statement of ignorance, considering that it's a important facet of the media industry.
If you really need everything spoon fed to you, then sure. When I wrote that statement, I had you in mind. But if you can not utilize something as simple as common sense, then I'll try to be more specific for you in the future.
Another contradiction (though readily pointed out) if the review didn't matter to them they wouldn't respond, yet alone register and I wouldn't call it "disagreement with my reasoning" but rather trolling. You need to know what you're dissagreeing with to have a credible opinion. Two of the three first comments contained the segment tl;dr--too long didn't read--nullifying their credability.
They heard about your review, came and expressed their opinions in one form or another, and then left. That's is all. They found it more entertaining than anything. But no one took your review seriously. That is what I;ve been getting at.
Of course. But I expect them to understand or at the very least read what I "say and do".
And some did. And those who did clearly disagreed with you and did not take your review seriously.
Well it's not as much as much the manga as the fans praise and exalt this piece of garbage to others. Let me rephrase that, it's an interaction between the two, the manga is extremely overrated based off its lack and void of quality.
Prehaps. Prehaps not. As I said, I am not one to judge the actual work itself, and you are not the first person to give it a negative review. One of my friends on NF also disliked the manga, but he at least aknowledged in his own review that it was his personal opinion that the manga wasn't good, rather than going on a rant about how he was right and no one else should bother reading the manga.
Like I said, I have been talking about the review you gave, and not the manga.
What you're addressing is the typical format of a review, what you're writing is nonsense.
Because, as I previously stated, go more in-depth would get neither of us anywhere. And no it isn't
Unintentionally referring to when I left.
Oh yes. If there was the slightest possibility that we do miss something about you, Astner, it was the numerous opportunities to destroy you. But even that was growing stale.
Just like the thread was intended for. Another success then I take it?
After seeing you ridiculed by a forum regular here, meaning that you have been mocked in at least 3 different places I've seen now (not to mention you're awful spelling and grammar)? Yes. You deserve some applause.
