Originally posted by Hewhoknowsalli was correcting your innacurate view of Agincourt. and yes you did lie. You made something up. You said something you either know was not true, or knew was BS. You lied. there is no account of agincourt except yours that said they died of suffocation.
[B]"that he wasn't debating SW"What? What forum do you think this thread is in?
Originally posted by Shoes
Since you simply skimp over his posts and post fellacious arguments against whatever your cursor highlights, I assume you didn't see when he said that you weren't worth his time.ya hewho why are you arguing about romans?
Your pathetic attempt to blanket your frustration with that overused acronym is transparent. You're the one taking everything personally, and then pretending to laugh it off.
See?
The "big" picture is Romans v SW, which is horribly spiteful.
You ignored a large part of my post to you. What about the harass part? It was in the middle, and you cut it out. Why did you ignore that part?
And if it's a spite (I'd assume against the Roman Empire), why is One Free Man supporting the Roman Empire?
Originally posted by One Free Man
i was correcting your innacurate view of Agincourt. and yes you did lie. You made something up. You said something you either know was not true, or knew was BS. You lied. there is no account of agincourt except yours that said they died of suffocation.
YouTube video
You ignored my post.
You didn't actually respond to my questions.
You did not explain how Rome could communicate to that many troops in the middle of a battle.
You did not explain why you think that the French were in a worse position than the Romans because the French were being attacked by longbows, even though the Romans will be fired on by BLASTERS and will get Force pushed and will get attacked by Jedi wielding lightsabers.
You did not explain how the Romans feed that many troops and how they maintain their supply lines for that many troops.
I have been arguing most of the above points for several pages, and when you would do the standard quoting my argument and then responding to it, you would cut out the parts that contain these or use strawmans and/or delaying tactics. This is quite obviously because you can't answer them.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
You ignored a large part of my post to you. What about the harass part? It was in the middle, and you cut it out. Why did you ignore that part?And if it's a spite (I'd assume against the Roman Empire), why is One Free Man supporting the Roman Empire?
Because before you edited, you continued to press SW, after he said he was no longer interested.
However, it's interesting that you only made a comment about me not making a comment. And the thread itself is not spiteful; you are, because you are arguing for one side.
Originally posted by Shoes
Because before you edited, you continued to press SW, after he said he was no longer interested.However, it's interesting that you only made a comment about me not making a comment. And the thread itself is not spiteful; you are, because you are arguing for one side.
What? Dude, that's a lame excuse. You ignored my rebuttal to your harassment point.
That's not what a spite means.
Ah good old Rex. I won't give him a reason to ban me though XD.
And no, hewhoknowsnada, your really getting desperate, aren't you? The hopeful perky way you posted that last post, as if something amazing was going to happen. maybe, just maybe, once, someone besides you would say that you won a debate.
Not happening, brutha.
You give plenty whenever you post an insult. Don't waste my time with this petty arguing with Hewhoknowsall. You're trolling and it's blatant and it's annoying. I already told you this in another thread.
In fact, put Hewhoknowsall on ignore if he really bothers you.
And Lettum, please don't post comments like that.
Stay on topic, everyone, or there'll be warnings. You can thank OFM.
Originally posted by One Free Man
Ah good old Rex. I won't give him a reason to ban me though XD.And no, hewhoknowsnada, your really getting desperate, aren't you? The hopeful perky way you posted that last post, as if something amazing was going to happen. maybe, just maybe, once, someone besides you would say that you won a debate.
Not happening, brutha.
On topic:
You STILL haven't shown how the Romans could possibly put 1.4 million troops in one battle using ancient technology.
You STILL haven't shown how the Romans will be able to do anything if the Jedi simply retreat (and Jedi are faster than Romans by a LOT) and attack again, possibly at night and/or from far away with snipers.
These two points pretty much destroy your entire argument, which lies on the idea that the Jedi would stand there in one place without using any tactics while the Romans somehow assemble, feed and coordinate a huge army and surround them. Even then, the Jedi may still win.
As soon as the Jedi use (gasp!) tactics, your argument falls to pieces.
Get it? You yourself admitted that the Jedi will win if they attack like covert spies, which they are allowed to and capable of doing. You say that the Romans will only win if they attack at once and the Jedi for some reason fight them in some big battle, which is virtually impossible. You don't think so (although you, after several pages, have responded to almost everything except for this one point) because you don't understand how important logistics are.
Therefore, the only situation in which the Romans have a chance (by your own admission) is a virtually impossible situation.
Therefore, the Jedi win.
Originally posted by Shoes
See, if it's a virtually impossible situation for the romans, [b]why make this thread? To show off your impressive debating skills? [/B]
Explain why One Free Man still supports the Roman Empire.
The Jedi win.
One Free Man admitted that the Roman Empire only wins if they can gather 1.4 million troops into one army and attack in the Jedi in an open plain field. He admits that if the Jedi go gureilla then the Jedi win. However, the Jedi WILL go gureilla, so the Jedi would, as admitted by One Free Man, win.
He also admits that the Jedi would win if the Romans bow down and worship them for their powers, which most of the Romans WOULD. Therefore, as admitted by One Free Man, the Jedi win.
His scenario of the Romans attacking the Jedi by using 1.4 million troops in one battle is hypocritical, because he blames me for making up unlikely hypothetical situtations. However, the idea of the Romans somehow putting 1.4 million troops into one battlefield and getting past the logistical problems with that is less likely than any of my hypothetical scenarios. One Free Man refuses to believe this because he doesn't think deeply enough. He doesn't understand how important logistics are, and doesn't factor in coordination and other factors that are crucial to an army. He's only like "zomg the Romans get so many troops!!!!!", even though numbers mean nothing if they all starve to death or sit there and do nothing. Therefore, One Free Man's scenario is a hypocritical hypothetical situation that has numerous problems.
I'll admit that, if the Romans somehow magically coordinated and fed 1.4 million troops and the Jedi stupidly meet them on an open battlefield while sitting there and not utilizing (gasp!) tactics, the Romans MIGHT win. However, it the Jedi were to fight smart and use tactics that they are obviously capable of; I sitting next to a computer can think up of them, and many members of the NJO were former generals, then the Jedi win WITH EASE.
Therefore, the Jedi win.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
In this other thread, you claimed that I admitted that that thread was a spite early on, referring to this quote that I posted. In that post I said that I thought that Earth would win (which is true; almost everyone ended up agreeing, and hypocritically blamed me for making a spite thread when they themselves didn't notice it and argued for the Empire), but that it would be close.You lied and said that I said that it would be a spite (which I later admitted to, but after you made this claim) when I didn't. You took things out of context.
What are you talking about?
You made a thread against the rules and you openly admit one side would win. Why?
Originally posted by REXXXX
Stay on topic, everyone, or there'll be warnings. You can thank OFM.
Why aren't you closing this??
Star Wars Versus Forums rules:
Keep them Star Wars related.
Matches between non-SW characters will be closed. Both characters must be from Star Wars.