Originally posted by Digi
This is faulty logic. Kandy's point: Studies have shown that there is absolutely no trace of the original substance in the water. And your response is to question if they've tested every molecule? Even if they haven't, it doesn't amount to positive evidence for your assertion, that there is some amount of the original substance. You seem lacking with proper logical backing for your point. Because you've proven nothing, and you haven't even provided evidence against the studies that go against your opinion. You've just called them into question based on nothing but speculation.You're not substituting evidence in for this potential flaw. You're substituting in a guess.
You missed the point. You actually did not address this point at all:
"So your studies looked at every single molecule, right?"
And, you seem hostile. I won't respond to you anymore.