Biggest crybaby

Started by 75312 pages

Originally posted by Creshosk
What a joke. One could claim you are a sociopath for calling chomper a crybaby a page ago in this thread by the same standards you're using. Sociopaths are ciompletelly incapable of feeling empathy or remorse.

Feeling more empathy for people who deserve it more because their losses are greater is normality. nobody would treat both losses the same way.

Your argument ammounts to: "paris hilton couldnt get her ipod in the color she wanted. boohoo her pain is every bit as legit and should be taken with the same consideration as people who lost their legs, otherwise you're being insensitive to small tragedies and are, therefore, a sociopath. I mean how is her pain any smaller because others suffered more?"

PS: Go to that dictionary and look up 'pervasive'

Originally posted by jalek moye
wait are you seriously trying to say that crying because you think your wife is dead makes u a crybaby?
no. saying there is a time and place to grief and fighting the hulk is not one of them,... hulk actually felt sorry for parker and stop fighting him.

Originally posted by chomperx9
honestly there needs to be a disrespect forum for characters where there is a rule where you cant spam the thread with fanboyism and back up your character if you feel offended by the posts in that characters thread.

just like in the character respect threads you arent allowed to post any negative comments in there about the characters or its spamming.

reason for the Disrespect Forum idea is so on there you can discuss why characters suck and there is no bashing or spamming like in the vs forum. that is the place to discuss why they suck and if anyone posts any positive comments about the character its considered spamming.

please forward this to RAZ

Originally posted by 753
What a joke. One could claim you are a sociopath for calling chomper a crybaby a page ago in this thread by the same standards you're using. Sociopaths are uncapable of feeling empathy towards others or remorse for the harm they cause them.
Except you'd be wrong.

He went into a thread and basically trolled by makeing implications. Then when three people responded to him he reported them.

And from the way it sounded he'd done that frequently.

Originally posted by 753
Feeling more empathy for people who deserve it more because their losses are greater is normality. nobody would treat both losses the same way.
Being unable to feel empathy for the lesser person?

Gee, what does that sound like?

Originally posted by 753
Your argument ammounts to: "paris hilton couldnt get her ipod in the color she wanted. boohoo her pain is every bit as legit and should be taken with the same consideration as people who lost their legs, otherwise you're being insensitive to small tragedies and are, therefore, a sociopath. I mean how is her pain any smaller because others suffered more?"
Strawman. nice to see you're not capable of logical thinking.

Originally posted by 753
PS: Go to that dictionary and look up 'pervasive'
I know what it means.

Originally posted by King Castle
no. saying there is a time and place to grief and fighting the hulk is not one of them,... hulk actually felt sorry for parker and stop fighting him.
And I'm sure you have 100% control of your feelings?

Or did you kjust realize how stupid your arguments are and are trying to back peddle?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Except you'd be wrong.

He went into a thread and basically trolled by makeing implications. Then when three people responded to him he reported them.

wrong i only reported one person. no need to say who

Originally posted by 753
It doesnt lessen his, it just makes it comparativelly insignificant. I was replying to the claim that it's so amazing he is so healthy when he's had it worse than everyone else. He probably had one of the least traumatic existences in superheroe comics.

i wouldn't go that far. he's gone through some pretty traumatic shit in his life. yes, other people have gone through worse, but watching New Krypton explode is hardly "insignificant".

as for everyone else, and i mean EVERYONE, cut out the bashing. If you're arrogant enough to think it doesn't apply to you, then it most certainly does.

Originally posted by chomperx9
wrong i only reported one person. no need to say who
Regardless of how many you reported, the fact is that you couldn't handle three people responding to you at the sametime respnding to a rather leading sounding question, and so what did you do?

You went above and beyond what's an acceptable amount of emotional display.

Originally posted by Creshosk
And I'm sure you have 100% control of your feelings?

Or did you just realize how stupid your arguments are and are trying to back peddle?

i didnt back peddle i said it clearly that a soldier or warrior doesnt cry in mid battle like parker has done more then once.. the fight is what is important then your emotional issues after its all done... he is a crybaby b/c he couldnt compartmentalize what was more important right there in time.

and my argument isnt stupid it is simply an argument

Originally posted by Creshosk
Regardless of how many you reported, the fact is that you couldn't handle three people responding to you at the sametime respnding to a rather leading sounding question, and so what did you do?

You went above and beyond what's an acceptable amount of emotional display.

it had nothing to do with 3 people it was only one person's posts that were un necessary. the others i let slide by. you can ask the mods what i put in the report i said nothing about multiple members. only a single one.

and if there was no need for the report then no mod would have responded. so there for someone was acting innapropriately

Originally posted by King Castle
i didnt back peddle i said it clearly that a soldier or warrior doesnt cry in mid battle like parker has done more then once.. the fight is what is important then your emotional issues after its all done... he is a crybaby b/c he couldnt compartmentalize what was more important right there in time.

and my argument isnt stupid it is simply an argument

Except as it was pointed out he's NOT a soldier.

You're applying a false standard to him, and then using circular reasoning to justify it.

no, your argument is stupid because it's illogical and displays some sociopathic traits.

Originally posted by chomperx9
it had nothing to do with 3 people it was only one persons posts that were un necessary. the others i let slide by. you can ask the mods what i put in the report i said nothing about multiple mebers. only a single one
Then I guess the mod misunderstsood. And based on that misinterpritation I followed suit I was in the wrong. I'm sorry for my comments regarding you on that subject.

I made a mistake.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Except you'd be wrong.

He went into a thread and basically trolled by makeing implications. Then when three people responded to him he reported them.

so what? does that mean you can disregard his feelings?


Being unable to feel empathy for the lesser person?Gee, what does that sound like?
Lesser person, so you say. I said the one who suffered the lesser loss. And it's not being unable to feel any empathy (although the loss might be so insignificant to the observer's standards that it arouses none, like paris hilton and her ipod, her pain is still real to her, but few people would give a **** about it), it's feeling a lot less empathy, so much less empathy that when both losses are compared, the lesser one seems insignificant in comparison because it is insignificant in comparison. It takes an emotionally colorblind person not to see this.

"Who cares that someone else's wife just died?" If my girlfriend left me and my friend's wife died I would suck it the **** up and keep it in perspective that my pain while real is nothing compared to his. Any sane outside observer would see it the same way. No sane person would atribute the same weight to them both. If the widower wants a long period off from work, it's reasonable and fair to give it to him. If a guy gets dumped by his 1year gf, feels like shit and wants the same, it's not. He's socially expected to keep it toghether because people can naturally estimate the degrees of trauma another person is going through and act accordingly. We all relativize pain, it's part of our affective lifes from our childhoods.

Now, you said SM is super mentally healthy because he had it worse than everyone and was superfunctional. I was pointing out that he didnt have it worse and his pain pails in comparison to others.


Strawman. nice to see you're not capable of logical thinking.

oh was it? haha whatever you say

I know what it means.
you clearly don't

Originally posted by -Pr-
i wouldn't go that far. he's gone through some pretty traumatic shit in his life. yes, other people have gone through worse, but watching New Krypton explode is hardly "insignificant".

Granted. NK was a rough deal by any standards.

kill this thread with fire

Originally posted by King Castle

what's wrong with that?

Originally posted by psycho gundam
kill this thread with fire

patience...

Originally posted by 753
so what? does that mean you can disregard his feelings?
I misunderstood the situation and apologized.

Originally posted by 753
Lesser person, so you say. I said the one who suffered the lesser loss. And it's not being unable to feel any empathy (although the loss might be so insignificant to the observer's standards, it causes none, like paris hilton and her ipod, her pain is still real to her), it's feeling a lot less empathy, so much less empathy that when both losses are compared, the lesser one seems insignificant in comparison [B] because it is insignificant in comparison. It takes an emotionally colorblind person not to see this. [/b]
And yet you're still trying to rationalize calling the pain of somebody's break up insignificant.

Even strawmanning it to something that truly is trivial.

Originally posted by 753
"Who cares that someone else's wife just died?" If my girlfriend left me and my friend's wife died I would suck it the **** up and keep it in perspective that my pain while real is nothing compared to his.
Bullshit. It's easy to make such a claim when its not occuring, but i doubt you'd be able to just "suck it up"

Originally posted by 753
Any sane outside observer would see it the same way. No sane person would atribute the same weight to them both.
But apparently its acceptable for a sane person to call someone's legitimate loss insignificant. 🙄

Originally posted by 753
If the widower wants a long period off from work, it's reasonable and fair to give it to him. If a guy gets dumped by his 1year gf, feels like shit and wants the same, it's not. He's socially expected to keep it toghether because people can naturally estimate the degrees of trauma another person is going through and act accordingly. We all relativize pain, it's part of our affective lifes from our childhoods.
But its certainly not "insignificant".

Originally posted by 753
Now, you said SM is super mentally healthy because he had it worse than everyone and was superfunctional. I was pointing out that he didnt have it worse and his pain pails in comparison to others.
Which is incorrect.

Originally posted by 753
oh was it? haha whatever you say
Yes it was. rather than addressing my point you felt the need to exagerate it to an extreme.

Originally posted by 753
you clearly don't
Because some random nobody on the internet says so? I guess you have mind reading powers or don't understand the concept of individuality or the concept of the pribvate mind?

Right...

Originally posted by King Castle
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/6084/feat13fight10si4.jpg
Originally posted by Creshosk
You really are a sociopath.

Originally posted by chomperx9
That's a terrible idea.

Why have a section dedicated to promoting negativity?