Originally posted by Creshoskbecause in normal threads like in this thread for example it goes off topic with negativity and turns into debates and sometimes leads towards bashing. A disrespect forum would be a place to discuss or post any negative pictures about a character. and those threads are only for the people who dislike the character.
That's a terrible idea.Why have a section dedicated to promoting negativity?
kinda like in the respect forum u cannot add any negative comments or post some pictures of the characters getting their butts kicked. and the only people that post in there are the ones who enjoy the character.
A disrespect forum would be the opposite you can only post if you agree to not liking the character and any positive comments would be spamming. there for it would be a place for people to talk and discuss why they suck and there would be no member bashing or fights.
for example someone would make a superman disrespect thread and you post what ever you want about supes why you dont like him or any pictures him getting owned. if PR or shokozugi were to post in there it would be spamming. not saying certain members would not be allowed in certain threads. but you get the idea by what i mean about the 2 posting.
Originally posted by chomperx9That's the point of this forum, its a debate forum.
because in normal threads like in this thread for example it goes off topic with negativity and turns into debates
Originally posted by chomperx9this was a bad idea for a thread. And I really don't think that a disrespect forum is a good idea.
and sometimes leads towards bashing. A disrespect forum would be a place to discuss or post any negative pictures about a character. and those threads are only for the people who dislike the character.kinda like in the respect forum u cannot add any negative comments or post some pictures of the characters getting their butts kicked. and the only people that post in there are the ones who enjoy the character.
A disrespect forum would be the opposite you can only post if you agree to not liking the character and any positive comments would be spamming. there for it would be a place for people to talk and discuss why they suck and there would be no member bashing or fights.
for example someone would make a superman disrespect thread and you post what ever you want about supes why you dont like him or any pictures him getting owned. if PR or shokozugi were to post in there it would be spamming. not saying certain members would not be allowed in certain threads. but you get the idea by what i mean about the 2 posting.
Originally posted by Creshoskthis is supposed to be a vs forum discuss why this character would win over this one. not make the other one look like crap. a cry baby thread is making characters look bad and as u can tell already certain members get offended when posting certain characters that they like and that pissed them off and turns into bashing.
That's the point of this forum, its a debate forum.this was a bad idea for a thread. And I really don't think that a disrespect forum is a good idea.
a disrespect forum would be the place to discuss why a character is a cry baby why they get their ass kicked alot and only people who want to post negative about the character can post in that thread or its spamming.
think of it like the respect forum but completely the opposite
Originally posted by Creshosk
And yet you're still trying to rationalize calling the pain of somebody's break up insignificant.Even strawmanning it to something that truly is trivial.
Insignificant to you.
You just dismiss that which is insignificant to your own values and say people who dismiss a pain you find significant are sociopaths. You may seem just as callous calling that ipod loss trivial to someone else as I seem to you.
Doubt away.
Bullshit. It's easy to make such a claim when its not occuring, but i doubt you'd be able to just "suck it up"
But apparently its acceptable for a sane person to call someone's legitimate loss insignificant. 🙄
In comparative terms, which is what I've been saying from the beggining, it is insignificant. My response to one would be much bigger than to the other. So much so, that the other becomes irrelevant when contrasted to the one.
To the one suffering, it's not, but to a sane observer watching both losses, it's comparativelly insignificant. This is called perspective.
But its certainly not "insignificant".
Yes it was. rather than addressing my point you felt the need to exagerate it to an extreme.
Like I said above, what you find insignifcant someone else may not. If your idea is that all pain is worthy of consideration because it's real to the sufferer (as it seems to be), then you shouldn't be dismissing the turmoils of spoiled rich girls.
Because some random nobody on the internet says so? I guess you have mind reading powers or don't understand the concept of individuality or the concept of the pribvate mind?
Well, if you knew what pervasive is, you would have correctly interpreted that dictionary definition of sociopathy instead flaunting it about like you did. Sociopathy is a fundamental incapacity for empathy and remorse. It is total, utter and all encompassing (pervasive) disregard for the feelings and lifes of others. It is not having a comparative outlook on the different degrees of trauma one goes through in life. When I said that the lesser loss is insignifcant in comparison, but the greater one isn't and is worthy of consideration, this alone would contradict a 'pervasive disregard'.
Or maybe you did know what it means and just wanted to use it as a buzzword... Which is it?
BTW, you are a tad too agressive here aren't you? Maybe you should practice what you preach and exercise that boundless empathy of yours for all living creatures.
Originally posted by chomperx9It's a bad idea. Period.
this is supposed to be a vs forum discuss why this character would win over this one. not make the other one look like crap. a cry baby thread is making characters look bad and as u can tell already certain members get offended when posting certain characters that they like and that pissed them off and turns into bashing.a disrespect forum would be the place to discuss why a character is a cry baby why they get their ass kicked alot and only people who want to post negative about the character can post in that thread or its spamming.
think of it like the respect forum but completely the opposite
Originally posted by 753So you're saying that Paris Hilton's pain is equivilent? Here I thought you were using it as a pathetic qattempt to discredit my arguments.
Insignificant to you.
You just dismiss that which is insignificant to your own values and say people who dismiss a pain you find significant are sociopaths. You may seem just as callous calling that ipod loss trivial to someone else as I seem to you.
Originally posted by 753Yeah, I'll believe you're not a sociopath.
Doubt away.
Originally posted by 753But it's NOT insignificant. You're effectively saying his pain is 0. 50 may not be 100 or 1000, but its certainly not 10 or less.
In comparative terms, which is what I've been saying from the beggining, it is insignificant. My response to one would be much bigger than to the other. So much so, that the other becomes irrelevant when contrasted to the one.
Originally posted by 753I'm not talking about subjective standards here.
To the one suffering, it's not, but to a sane observer watching both losses, it's comparativelly insignificant. This is called perspective.
Originally posted by 753Except I'm not using a subjective standard to dismiss another person's feelings.
Like I said above, what you find insignifcant someone else may not. If your idea is that all pain is worthy of consideration because it's real to the sufferer (as it seems to be), then you shouldn't be dismissing the turmoils of spoiled rich girls.
When I say trivial, I mean less than 5. I unlike you am not saying it's 0.
Originally posted by 753Dismissing of feelings and rationaqlization of why its okay.
Well, if you knew what pervasive is, you would have correctly interpreted that dictionary definition of sociopathy instead flaunting it about like you did.[]/b][quyote] Or perhaps you're not understanding the full situation. all I've seen from you, everything I've seen from you and king castle are "Suck it up" "their pain doesn't matter." :"who cares?"So from my standpoint yes, its all encompassing.
[QUOTE=12938052]Originally posted by 753
[B] Sociopathy is a fundamental incapacity for empathy and remorse. It is total, utter and all encompassing (pervasive) disregard for the feelings and lifes of others.[/]b]/[quote] andf that's all I've seen from you."I'd tell my frined who broke up with his girl to suck it up."
Where's the empathy? Then I've seen attmepts to justify this.
And that's it.
Hell king castle took spiderman's actions as crying. That's certainly inability to interpret another's feelings.
[QUOTE=12938052]Originally posted by 753
[B]It is not having a comparative outlook on the different degrees of trauma one goes through in life. When I said that the lesser loss is insignifcant in comparison,
Originally posted by 753it's a rationalization. You could keep using the reasoning up into the ridiculous.
but the greater one isn't and is worthy of consideration, this alone would contradict a 'pervasive disregard'.
"Why should I care about the guy who lost an hand? That guy lost his arm! Why should I care about the guy who lost an arm? That Guy lost two arms!" And so on. Its a rationalization for dismissing a person's feelings.
If you'd so easily dismiss a significant pain How would I trust that you wouldn't do it to another significant pain given that a greater one can exist?
That's all I know from you is this desire to trivialize significant pain by comparing it to disapointment.
Rationalization of your sociopathic tendencies.
Originally posted by 753False dicotomy.
Or maybe you did know what it means and just wanted to use it as a buzzword... Which is it?
Originally posted by 753Strawman.
BTW, you are a tad too agressive here aren't you? Maybe you should practice what you preach and exercise that boundless empathy of yours for all living creatures.
Are you not capable of compotently reading what others say?
you make up what you think they said and adress those points ignoring what they actually said.
Originally posted by King Castle
i realize my pain is inconsequential in the grand scheme of life so i try not to let it effect me to the point i am a crying sniffling lil girl like guys like peter who seems to constantly cry when his wife breaks up with him or when he thinks of qwen years later etc etc..he cries in mid battle about his wife that is a no no for a real soldier warrior.. your sole mission is to focus what is on hand and worry about your private life when you are back home
go look up post traumatic stress disorder.
the spartans used to get into a circle after every battle and have a big cry.
theres a difference between a soldier and a heartless sociopath
Originally posted by King CastleIf they did there might not be as much PTSD, sociopath.
yeh,, i dont see modern soldiers or warriors like marines doing that today and even being considered normal..drylaugh
Originally posted by chomperx9What?
@ Creshosk how come you gotta log out every time after posting ?
Originally posted by King CastleSeeing as what your social inabilities are you're not fit to judge anything in this context. You're dismissed.
either way peter deals with his traumatic issues less effectively then others who simply bury it and let it out in the appropriate time in the form of rage..petey cries, moans and releases it at the worst possible times at times.