Blade vs Hit Girl

Started by Rogue Jedi13 pages

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
show me a scene where she uses a stun.g
There isn't one. Doesn't matter. She had them in her suitcase when she went to the final shootout, and she had one strapped to her chest.

It's part of her gear, it's part of "everything she had."

Sunglasses.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Sunglasses.
Sunglasses have gaps on the sides that allow light in.

Hearing.

Sense of balance.

All around ****ed up.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Nah, you're just butthurt because the stun grenade angle is unbeatable.

Heightened senses= More vulnerable to stun grenades.

Hit Girl dodges bullets.

End facts.

No, what I said, you're the ultimate down-player when it suits you. You've turned Blade into a moron and made Hit-Girl out to be far more than she's shown

It's unbeatable only if we make out Blade to be a complete imbecile who's not going to use his super-abilities to overwhelm a little girl. Than sure, your flash-bang angle is solid.

She didn't dodge machine-gun fire. Let me guess, in your mind she's going to move and head and dance around a spray of bullets, cos.

Nah, she'll just go stealth, chuck a stun grenade at him, stun him, then shoot him in the head.

Are you getting senile from old age?

What is this "Go stealth" bullshit?

If Blade has her in his vision, she will not be able to hide, and he can see alot better in the dark than she can with Nightvision.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Are you getting senile from old age?

What is this "Go stealth" bullshit?

If Blade has her in his vision, she will not be able to hide, and he can see alot better in the dark than she can with Nightvision.

Dude, calm down, wtf is wrong with you?

The OP doesn't state if they are facing each other from ten feet, or if they start out at opposite ends of the building, or if they are in opposite rooms. HG showed better stealth than Blade did, just saying.

I did notice that it said at 1 am. This brings even more validity to the strobe light argument.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Dude, calm down, wtf is wrong with you?

The OP doesn't state if they are facing each other from ten feet, or if they start out at opposite ends of the building, or if they are in opposite rooms. HG showed better stealth than Blade did, just saying.

I did notice that it said at 1 am. This brings even more validity to the strobe light argument.

Turning off the lights is not "better stealth".

As you said, Blade has super senses, it's fair to say he'd likely become aware of her location before she did his. (now is the time you insist Blade doesn't have better senses)

1:00 AM in a well lite building. She turns off the lights, it's in Blade's favor. He stalks at night.

Originally posted by Robtard
Turning off the lights is not "better stealth".

As you said, Blade has super senses, it's fair to say he'd likely become aware of her location before she did his. (now is the time you insist Blade doesn't have better senses)

1:00 AM in a well lite building.

Here we go again.....The "super" vampire senses are "super" fried when she uses a stun grenade. Think about DD on his knees when the subway passed.

And again, she knows the layout of the building. HG killing the lights is very feasible.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Here we go again.....The "super" vampire senses are "super" fried when she uses a stun grenade. Think about DD on his knees when the subway passed.

And again, she knows the layout of the building. HG killing the lights is very feasible.

Indeed, you can't keep shit straight yet again. She'd have to find him first and be able to use it first. Your scenario counted on this. As you said "she goes stealth", never mind she can't do this, she isn't a Klingon Bird of Prey.

Considering Blade's likely to find her first, and he's faster, there goes your little flash-bang theory.

Again, her klling the lights works in Blade's favor, night-vision, superior sensese, faster etc. In the darkness, it's almost guaranteed he would sneak up on her.

Originally posted by Robtard
Indeed, you can't keep shit straight yet again. She'd have to find him first and be able to use it first. Your scenario counted on this. As you said "she goes stealth", never mind she can't do this, she isn't a Klingon Bird of Prey.

Considering Blade's likely to find her first, and he's faster, there goes your little flash-bang theory.

Again, her klling the lights works in Blade's favor, night-vision, superior sensese, faster etc. In the darkness, it's almost guaranteed he would sneak up on her.

No, not if it's pitch black. The sewers in Blade 2 were far from pitch black. Do you have any idea what NV is?

Or she could simply retreat to D'Amico's office, one way in, one way out. Because she like knows the layout of the building and stuff.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No, not if it's pitch black. The sewers in Blade 2 were far from pitch black. Do you have any idea what NV is?

Or she could simply retreat to D'Amico's office, one way in, one way out. Because she like knows the layout of the building and stuff.

So her night-vision goggles will work in this 'pitch black office', but Blade's "see in the dark" eyes won't? LoL.

OK. She retreats to D'Amico's office (somehow avoiding Blade); Blade lights the building of fire. /the end

As a matter of fact, yes. Just watch the rescue scene in Kick Ass for proof of that. Her NVG have been shown working in a pitch black environment. Blade has never been shown seeing in a pitch black environment.

Nah, she'd dodge the fire and cast fiendfyre on it.

Hahahahahahaha, fail. Except of course when they're in the sewer and it's implied it's pitch black, as Whistler says "I can't see in the dark" and [i[he[/i] has to use NV-Goggles.

It's a sewer and there where no lights, it's pitch black. Underground + No Lights = Darkness. Lighting was used so the audience could see what was going on.

Sorry, but you killed her with your scenario again. She's burned.

Yeah, but we can see them, there is faint light, it's not pitch black.

Whistler said "dark", not "pitch black." Lighting or not, it's what we saw. Accept it.

Next question.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yeah, but we can see them, there is faint light, it's not pitch black.

Whistler said "dark", not "pitch black." Lighting or not, it's what we saw. Accept it.

Next question.

That was added for the benefit of the audience and the actors, you chimp. Wouldn't be much of an action movie if the audience is starring at a black screen for 15 mins.

Sewer plus no lighting = pitch black. Now you're being an extra sore loser.

Originally posted by Robtard
That was added for the benefit of the audience and the actors, you chimp. Wouldn't be much of an action movie if the audience is starring at a black screen for 15 mins.

Sewer plus no lighting = pitch black. Now you're being an extra sore loser.

MVF golden rule, babe.

The sewer was not pitch black. There were sidewalk grates allowing light in. BONG.

What a sad troll you're being.

btw, go watch the Hit-Girl warehouse scene ,you see the goons too when the camera isn't from HG's prespective, iirc.

Gotta go with Rob on this one.

The "lighting" of the sewers was for audience purposes. We, the audience, would not be able to view the film were it entire scenes of pitch black accompanied by 1960's Batman sitcom fight sounds. Zoff, Bam, Whiff, SNUH, etc.

Whistler said it best: "Some of us can't see in the dark, you f*cking nipple head!"

How so? I'm just going with what we saw onscreen. The sewer was not pitch black, man.

Check it out: http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/other-gadgets/nightvision.htm