Blade vs Hit Girl

Started by Rogue Jedi13 pages

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
BUT DID SHE USE THEM IN THE FRACKING FILM WHICH REMEMBER SCREEN FEATS

sorry for the caps

Nope, but the OP did not specify that she can only use weapons she was shown using onscreen, It says "everything she had", this includes grenades and an MP5.

I didn't write the OP, and it's too late to change it. She "had" the grenades. Therefore she can use them.

Now, that said and done, to imply that HG would take a weapon into battle that she sucks with is just stupid.

Originally posted by Juk3n
😂

RJ, i like you..you argue tooth and frickin' nail, never giving an inch, i respect that dude. We'l have to agree to disagree, theres nothing else left to say and no other feats from either camp to pull out our asses, and circular arguments lead nowhere. Why don't we - me and you - leave it to the other guys to decide from what we've presented so far..i mean you can carry on if ya like, but im pretty done here.

See u in the next vs thread dude.

😂

👆 yeah agreed

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
👆 yeah agreed
Hey Brucey, what if I were to start a Batman versus thread and give Batman a bowie knife? Would you really argue that he would be shit with it?

Or if I gave him full gear, but he is never shown using one of the items on his utility belt, would you say he's shit with said item?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Hey Brucey, what if I were to start a Batman versus thread and give Batman a bowie knife? Would you really argue that he would be shit with it?

Or if I gave him full gear, but he is never shown using one of the items on his utility belt, would you say he's shit with said item?

well since he was never shown using a bowie knife

nah

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
well since he was never shown using a bowie knife

nah

Forget the first part, focus on the second.

If Batman was shown carrying a weapon/gadget but never shown using it, and someone argued that he sucks balls with said weapon/gadget, what then? You REALLY think Batman would carry it if he sucked with it?

Oh, so now HG = Batman...

LOL

durpalm

Originally posted by The Nuul
Oh, so now HG = Batman...

LOL

durpalm

Actually she would, if both have full gear.

I am using Batman as an example here because Batman is not an idiot, he will not carry an item into battle if he sucks with it.

Observe:

Originally posted by Impediment

The MVF Golden Rule:[b]What is seen on screen is canon in these forums. If your character you wish to use has feats/actions/handicaps that contradict what that character did on screen (movie canon), then it is a violation and is illegal. MOVIE FEATS ONLY!

-Impediment [/B]

Now, nowhere does it say "Said combatant MUST be shown using their listed weapons." The OP says "Everything she had." She HAD the grenades. She had an MP5. The only question that remains is if she is dumb enough to take them into battle if she sucks with them.

It's fairly simple.

Blade wins, I dont care what you have say and your wanking HG.

Originally posted by The Nuul
Blade wins, I dont care what you have say and your wanking HG.
He wins the h2h battle, prolly the sword battle, but he gets pwned with guns.

Good God, the crap never stops. RJ is now on ignore.

Buh bye.

Someone needs to make a 'Harry Potter Vs. Hit-Girl' thread, RJ's fanboyism will be beside itself.

Nah, Harry would rape her.

Originally posted by Robtard
Someone needs to make a 'Harry Potter Vs. Hit-Girl' thread, RJ's fanboyism will be beside itself.

No way, she stomps. Dodges the spells and KOs him.

Supes vs HG.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Nah, Harry would rape her.

Wait, so she's somehow going to take out Preston and Blade with her guns according to you, despite their speed and other abilities, but a wand waving kid is taking her out now?

See, told ya your Potter fanboysim wasn't gone.

LMAO Blade wins via extremely accurate flying glaive throat slit

Originally posted by Juk3n
She doesn't know how to fire it properly, shes got really bad aim with it, prove me wrong..which scene does she use it again? Thought so, she might aswell try and club him to death with it, cos she can't shoot for shit with that gun.

oh she can you say? Proof? Thought not.

And as for greneades? yah, im gonna have to go with the same logic there to bud, chances are she blows herself up with it, because she hasnt had the proper instruction with them.

Oh she can use them you say..? Did she use them in the .. no.. no i don't think she did,

she might have better luck with beating blade with it by feeding it to him, she sure as hell aint using it in this battle ^^

your logic is fun.

He uses absolutely no logic at all in his arguments. He tries to screw whatever character he's against most of the time, and never admits he's been outclassed. It's the way of things round these parts. Of course we all know because we use logic and common sense she's not going to have all these things, and use them but in his weird little head she is.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Nope, but the OP did not specify that she can only use weapons she was shown using onscreen, It says "everything she had", this includes grenades and an MP5.

I didn't write the OP, and it's too late to change it. She "had" the grenades. Therefore she can use them.

Now, that said and done, to imply that HG would take a weapon into battle that she sucks with is just stupid.

Once again you defy your own wannabe logic. I NEVER SEEN ANY FEATS WHERE SHE CARRIED EVERY SINGLE GUN ON THAT WALL. YET YOU CLAIM SHE'S USING EVERYTHING. I NEVER SEEN A FEAT WHERE SHE LITERALLY DODGED MACHINE GUN BULLETS, YET YOU CLAIM SHE CAN BC SHE DODGED A HANDGUN.

if you read beggining comments RJ says that blade is not a better marksman than HG but he can kill multiple vampires with a single glaive throw

The sad thing is, I like Hit Girl. I thought the movie was pretty awesome, and she was awesome in it. But it's retarded how much of a hard on people have for her at times when she's clearly outclassed.