Originally posted by 753
Yeah I agree. Vandalism is a more adequate definition for most of the incidents they called 'terrorist attacks'. I personally cannot lump the deliberate destruction of property toghether with the deliberate killing of innocent people

Edit: I think this treatment of any politically motivated ilegal action as terrorism is more of a political use of a buzzword than anything else.

fair enough, though, if it is vandalism or property destruction aimed at intimidating someone, to me that still is "terrorism".