Mother vs. Link (TP)

Originally posted by quanchi112
They are required for his strength feats. if he could do them unaided then you'd have a point but since he needs them I win.

The master sword was blockable against any knights and the sword previously impaled him. The triforce of power didn't make him any more durable he just resisted dying the first time so he gets impaled by any sword that comes his way.

He didn't turn to stone. I have no idea what you are talking about with this.

No, actually, they are not. The actual strength feat is throwing the Goron. Stopping them is all you need the boots for. Though stopping them does also help his Strength case. So no, you don't win. You lose. You are the loser. Haha. HAHA! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Really? It didn't make him any more durable at all? Then I am forced to demand an explanation for him tanking Midna, Light Arrows, multiple hits to his body, even that weak spot. And technically, since your TP only rule is stupid I should demand the same from instances in other games.

Well I did make it clear I was unsure. Otherwise you would have a point. But since I made it clear I win.

link-rape

Quanchi needs to shut the **** up and actually provide a single feat of Mother please. 🙂

Originally posted by BloodRain
Clip of Mother doing anything of mention?

I could give you a clip of her being killed by a tiny knife to the face, but I don't really like to look at her and the video is NSFW.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Which requires the boots to do meaning to have the strength to do that he must limit his mobility. If he does he is a sitting duck. They are required for his strength feats. if he could do them unaided then you'd have a point but since he needs them I win.

Graciously use before and still holds the point of what would happen with no strength. Image size be damned.

Tiny knife? Don't even think its worth viewing.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
No, actually, they are not. The actual strength feat is throwing the Goron. Stopping them is all you need the boots for. Though stopping them does also help his Strength case. So no, you don't win. You lose. You are the loser. Haha. HAHA! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Really? It didn't make him any more durable at all? Then I am forced to demand an explanation for him tanking Midna, Light Arrows, multiple hits to his body, even that weak spot. And technically, since your TP only rule is stupid I should demand the same from instances in other games.

Well I did make it clear I was unsure. Otherwise you would have a point. But since I made it clear I win.

link-rape

He isn't durable hence the two impalements and we didn't see what he did when the castle went down or what actually caused it. We did see how helpless he was both times he was impaled.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Quanchi needs to shut the **** up and actually provide a single feat of Mother please. 🙂

Originally posted by BloodRain
I'm sorry did you just say you win?
No matter the point, reason or situation the fact is that boots made to increase weight cant make you physically stronger.

Graciously use before and still holds the point of what would happen with no strength. Image size be damned.

Tiny knife? Don't even think its worth viewing.

Originally posted by BloodRain
No stone in TP, and depending on what timeline you follow TP and WW are the last appearances of Dorf in each timeline so he may or may not have survived after.

Clip of Mother doing anything of mention?

Did you play this game ?

The last appearance of Ganon in the child timeline is infact LoZ, from 1986. TP is much earlier, Ganon didn't die.

Ganon in the adult timeline is the exact same guy with the exact same powerset, anyway. There is no difference.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's what would actually happen had he had heavier boots on irl unlike the game which made the feats possible. The point is without the added weight he can't beat a goron in anything.

That's what would happen in real life because no one in real life is as strong as Link. There is a reason we use the Goron thing to prove that Link is strong.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The last appearance of Ganon in the child timeline is infact LoZ, from 1986. TP is much earlier, Ganon didn't die.

Ganon in the adult timeline is the exact same guy with the exact same powerset, anyway. There is no difference.

Originally posted by The Scenario
That's what would happen in real life because no one in real life is as strong as Link. There is a reason we use the Goron thing to prove that Link is strong.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Different timeline and no official word on anything really so this is just speculation.

Link isn't strong we see that when he wields the ball.

We see Link is strong when he wields the ball and chain, which a normal man couldn't even lift. Also, he has strength feats, gtfo. 😐

Originally posted by quanchi112
Link isn't strong we see that when he wields the ball.

The Ball and Chain is indeed heavy. Though Link does weild it far faster and throw it much farther than the boss he got it from, and the boss couldn't even move a few feet. Still, Link is darn strong to do that, just like he throws the Gorons. Actually, the Ball is a little smaller than a Goron and made of solid steel (it looks like).

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Actually, that is confirmed canon by Mitamoto himself. aLttP is officially a prequel to LoZ which is officially the last time Ganon is seen in the child timeline so far. We've had no games come after Zelda II.

We see Link is strong when he wields the ball and chain, which a normal man couldn't even lift. Also, he has strength feats, gtfo. 😐

haermm great, Quan thinks he knows more about Zelda than Nintendo.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
haermm great, Quan thinks he knows more about Zelda than [b]Nintendo. [/B]

Who's surprised?

I'm waiting for the post from GK about the Zelda timeline - and yes, there are parts of it that are confirmed.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wrong he made a few comments way back when and has never ever confirmed anything. I think he ran his mouth off wasn't sure and never addressed it again.

In fact, that's utterly unneeded anyway, as Ganondorf is the same through all games, and as the timelines diverge after OoT, Ganondorf in either timeline is the same Ganondorf as in OoT.

So you are utterly, completely wrong about Ganondorf, and you know little about the Zelda series. Go lay down before you hurt yourself.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Then show him throwing one with the boots. If you can do so then I will concede the point otherwise you just are a huge fan who really wants Link to be strong despite his actual portrayal in the game.

He isn't durable hence the two impalements and we didn't see what he did when the castle went down or what actually caused it. We did see how helpless he was both times he was impaled. this is the problem.

Uh, it's been shown, for a long frickin' time. Dangoro. The very first Goron you even meet. About fifteen others as you make your way up to Death Mountain. And stop with that portrayal bullshit, really.

Good job avoiding explaining being shot with the light arrows and still having a body. And yeah, exactly, we didn't see what happened.

Good job ignoring facts, as well. You know, if I picked and chose what I wanted to discuss as well as you and BT I could make a case that just about any character used on this board isn't "portrayed" as very powerful or is the result of nothing but childish toonforce.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
haermm great, Quan thinks he knows more about Zelda than [b]Nintendo. [/B]

Originally posted by General Kaliero
No, quan. TP was confirmed to be a direct sequel to OoT, by both Miyamoto and Aonuma. It takes place in the timeline created by Zelda sending Link back to his childhood. Young Link and Zelda convince the King of Ganondorf's intentions, and Ganondorf is imprisoned, tried, and sentenced to death, which is the cutscene in the middle of TP showing Ganondorf and the Sages. It is the same Ganondorf.

In fact, that's utterly unneeded anyway, as Ganondorf is the same through all games, and as the timelines diverge after OoT, Ganondorf in either timeline is the same Ganondorf as in OoT.

So you are utterly, completely wrong about Ganondorf, and you know little about the Zelda series. Go lay down before you hurt yourself.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Uh, it's been shown, for a long frickin' time. Dangoro. The very first Goron you even meet. About fifteen others as you make your way up to Death Mountain. And stop with that portrayal bullshit, really.

Good job avoiding explaining being shot with the light arrows and still having a body. And yeah, exactly, we didn't see what happened.

Good job ignoring facts, as well. You know, if I picked and chose what I wanted to discuss as well as you and BT I could make a case that just about any character used on this board isn't "portrayed" as very powerful or is the result of nothing but childish toonforce.

It's a gameplay aspect just like archdemon can survive a ballista, fire spells, forst spells, petrify spells, sword slashes, etc. We see that a sword can easily be implaed into him twice in two different cutscenes.

I don't ignore facts I embrace them.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Which requires the boots to do meaning to have the strength to do that he must limit his mobility. If he does he is a sitting duck. They are required for his strength feats. if he could do them unaided then you'd have a point but since he needs them I win.

The master sword was blockable against any knights and the sword previously impaled him. The triforce of power didn't make him any more durable he just resisted dying the first time so he gets impaled by any sword that comes his way.

He didn't turn to stone. I have no idea what you are talking about with this.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure the boots made it so he couldn't get knocked over. Him lifting was his own strength.

Originally posted by Coco292
Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure the boots made it so he couldn't get knocked over. Him lifting was his own strength.