Originally posted by OneDumbG0Yes, because it launched him a few hundred yards. so you feel this isn't an effect from his blast and the wind pushed him back ? Wow.
^ There was no other effect. Because all the attack did was enrage him. It's right there in black and white. On-panel. Had it also harmed Galactus in addition to enraging him, Thanos wouldn't have said what he said. You shouldn't ignore what's written here. Particularly when Thanos himself explains it.
^ Because he launched him a few hundred yards and that's it. Not from hurting Galactus, much less "rocking" him. Being pushed a few hundred yards doesn't change that Thanos didn't do anything but enrage Galactus. Nothing more. Thanos didn't even have illusions that he did anything more:
Why you keep acting like Thanos did more, when Thanos himself immediately dispels such a notion is your own problem.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0So being launched a few hundred yards isn't rocking someone ? Really ? If it affected Galactus he reacted if it didn't affect him he'd have ignored him and went about his business.
^ Because he launched him a few hundred yards and that's it. Not from hurting Galactus, much less "rocking" him. Being pushed a few hundred yards doesn't change that Thanos didn't do anything but enrage Galactus. Nothing more. Thanos didn't even have illusions that he did anything more:Why you keep acting like Thanos did more, when Thanos [b]himself
immediately dispels such a notion is your own problem. [/B]
Originally posted by OneDumbG0It enraged him because it affected him. You seem confused about what actually happened on panel. If it didn't affect him like you say then why react ?
^ Not when it's stated outright that all it does is enrage someone. Again, Thanos dispels all notions that he did anything more. Who are you to argue with Thanos himself, much less the plain presentation of the comic?
Originally posted by quanchi112You're assuming your conclusion. As Mindset explains, you can be pushed around without being harmed at all and be enraged that somebody had the gall to push you around. Just because you don't want to explicitly accept this plain reality doesn't mean it doesn't apply to the situation at hand.
It enraged him because it affected him. You seem confused about what actually happened on panel. If it didn't affect him like you say then why react ?
This is especially so, when Thanos himself explains that very notion. He didn't do anything more than enrage him.
Originally posted by MindsetBeing pushed and being launched hundreds of yards are two different things. Don't be silly.
Being affected by an attack does not equal being hurt by it. You can be affected (enraged) by a push, that doesn't mean you were hurt by it.What does being rocked mean to you, Quan? How much damage is done to a person has been rocked?
Originally posted by OneDumbG0He rocked him initially but not enough to defeat him. If he wasn't rocked then he wouldn't have done anything to Thanos he would again have simply continued in his task.
You're assuming your conclusion. As Mindset explains, you can be pushed around without being harmed at all and be enraged that somebody had the gall to push you around. Just because you don't want to explicitly accept this plain reality doesn't mean it doesn't apply to the situation at hand.This is especially so, when Thanos himself explains that very notion. He didn't do anything more than enrage him.
Originally posted by quanchi112Being harmed and being launched hundreds of yards without being harmed are two different things as well. Don't be silly.
Being pushed and being launched hundreds of yards are two different things. Don't be silly.He rocked him initially but not enough to defeat him. If he wasn't rocked then he wouldn't have done anything to Thanos he would again have simply continued in his task.
If by "rocked" you mean launched him a few hundred yards and not harmed him and just pissed him off, then fine. I would posit that "rocked" is a highly inappropriate term here because that term usually denotes some sort of serious harm. Here, there was none. Especially since Thanos himself states that, your "loose" use of terminology notwithstanding.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0he was harmed not enough to put him in serious jeopardy.
Being harmed and being launched hundreds of yards without being harmed are two different things as well. Don't be silly.If by "rocked" you mean launched him a few hundred yards and not harmed him and just pissed him off, then fine. I would posit that "rocked" is a highly inappropriate term here because that term usually denotes some sort of serious harm. Here, there was none. Especially since Thanos himself states that, your "loose" use of terminology notwithstanding.
Just hearing you saying launched a few hundred yards and not hurt in the same sentence is truly something to behold.
I agree Thanos was correct in his assessment of Galactus not being close to defeat but he was still rocked, initially.
You do realize you can rock someone in real life and they can recover and crush you, right ?
Originally posted by quanchi112He was not harmed. Thanos states outright that all he did was enrage him. Nothing more. Read the comic.
he was harmed not enough to put him in serious jeopardy.Just hearing you saying launched a few hundred yards and not hurt in the same sentence is truly something to behold.
Surfer has been launched in the air by Hulk's fist and he hasn't been harmed. Asserting false absolutes is a logical fallacy. It exposes how infantile your argumentation here is on this point. You can be sent hundreds of yards without being harmed. Here's one example that I had scanned from from Incredible Hulk #440. Here, Thor "doesn't even feel the pain of the impact. It barely registers as an inconvenience": http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorDurability36bIncredibleHulk440B.jpg
Originally posted by quanchi112Thanos didn't assess that Galactus was not close to defeat. Thanos assessed that he didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus. Thanos didn't even have any illusion he did anything more than that.
I agree Thanos was correct in his assessment of Galactus not being close to defeat but he was still rocked, initially.You do realize you can rock someone in real life and they can recover and crush you, right ?
You do realize that revealing how loosely you play with terms like "rocked" doesn't change the fact that Thanos himself states outright he didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus:
Who are you to change what was stated in the comic itself?
Originally posted by OneDumbG0He was harmed not enough to be put in serious jeopardy.
He was not harmed. Thanos states outright that all he did was enrage him. Nothing more. Read the comic.Surfer has been launched in the air by Hulk's fist and he hasn't been harmed. Asserting false absolutes is a logical fallacy. It exposes how infantile your argumentation here is on this point. You can be sent hundreds of yards without being harmed. Here's one example that I had scanned from from Incredible Hulk #440. Here, Thor "doesn't even feel the pain of the impact. It barely registers as an inconvenience": http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorDurability36bIncredibleHulk440B.jpg Thanos didn't assess that Galactus was not close to defeat. Thanos assessed that he didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus. Thanos didn't even have any illusion he did anything more than that.
You do realize that revealing how loosely you play with terms like "rocked" doesn't change the fact that Thanos himself states outright he didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus:
Who are you to change what was stated in the comic itself?
There are numerous examples of Galactus also failing to even recognize a threat as it had no impact on him which Thanos obviously had.
He enraged Galactus due to rocking him and sending him back. It backs me up not you.
Originally posted by quanchi112He was not harmed. He was only enraged. Thanos himself states that he didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus. I'm afraid you're simply deflated on this point. It makes no difference that you're unwilling to admit it as your admission pales in worth to what's actually stated on-panel:
He was harmed not enough to be put in serious jeopardy.
Your statements are worth nothing compared to that. Your incorrect statements are worth even less.
Originally posted by quanchi112It still did nothing more than enrage him. Who are you to say it did more than that when Thanos himself said it didn't? You shouldn't be so obsessed with any illusions otherwise.
There are numerous examples of Galactus also failing to even recognize a threat as it had no impact on him which Thanos obviously had.He enraged Galactus due to rocking him and sending him back. It backs me up not you.
Galactus wasn't anything more than enraged. Stated by Thanos himself. Also, you are welcome for being taught that you can be sent flying hundreds of yards and not harmed. Really, you don't have to thank me for teaching you something you clearly did not know. It was no problem at all and I don't blame you for incorrectly thinking that you must be harmed if you're sent flying hundreds of yards.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0Yes due to the effects of the blast.
He was not harmed. He was only enraged. Thanos himself states that he didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus. I'm afraid you're simply deflated on this point. It makes no difference that you're unwilling to admit it as your admission pales in worth to what's actually stated on-panel:Your statements are worth nothing compared to that. Your incorrect statements are worth even less. It still did nothing more than enrage him. Who are you to say it did more than that when Thanos himself said it didn't? You shouldn't be so obsessed with any illusions otherwise.
Galactus wasn't anything more than enraged. Stated by Thanos himself. Also, you are welcome for being taught that you can be sent flying hundreds of yards and not harmed. Really, you don't have to thank me for teaching you something you clearly did not know. It was no problem at all and I don't blame you for incorrectly thinking that you must be harmed if you're sent flying hundreds of yards.
enraging Galactus is effecting galactus in this regards which not everyone can so especially when he's well fed. Go Thanos go.
Originally posted by quanchi112He was enraged at being sent flying while not being harmed.
Yes due to the effects of the blast.enraging Galactus is effecting galactus in this regards which not everyone can so especially when he's well fed. Go Thanos go.
You can enrage Galactus without harming Galactus. And Thanos did just that, enraged him without harming him. He didn't have illusions he did anything more. Fin.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Also, you are welcome for being taught that you can be sent flying hundreds of yards and not harmed. Really, you don't have to thank me for teaching you something you clearly did not know. It was no problem at all and I don't blame you for incorrectly thinking that you must be harmed if you're sent flying hundreds of yards.
First, he obviously did harm him.... for one thing... he helmet was shown to have taken damage.. You guys are acting like he was sqeeky clean and showed no damage and look the same as he did before the blast, which in fact, is not true
Second, just because Thanos states he did nothing more than make him angry doesn't mean he didn't feel it or took no damage that he was required to heal. I can punch Brock Lesner in the face.. and I could easily say... all I did was piss him off when it doesn't put him down. That doesn't mean he didn't feel it or took no damage from it. That is me simply understanding in the grand scheme of things I didn't pretty much no lasting damage. Him saying that doesn't prove Galactus took no damage or didn't feel anything.. just that Thanos doesn't have the firepower to put him down so all it did was piss him off.
That was easy.
