Thanos vs Herculese (current)

Started by OneDumbG015 pages

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Nice try ODG.. but it failed yet again.. You quoted ONLY PART of my first sentence in regards to harm... if you quoted the whole thing.. you will clearly see what I was talking about... I said first he clearly did harm him BECAUSE he see him looked in a different state then before the blast. He see damage actually evident on his body. That is exactly what I said the WHOLE Sentence. Not your exclusion of the entire eentence to support your attempts. I retreated from nothing...I said very clearly obviously there was harm done because he looks worse for the wear after the blast than before. However, that doesn't change the fact that it did no lasting damage or really hurt him in any way. Thanks for the attempt though.. but it was too easy.
You retreated. End. Of. Don't be so butt-hurt over being called out on it. It wasn't my fault when you haphazardly dared me to point it out. It was your's. Next time, keep track of your own statements.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Call my congressman over a disagreement online with someone about a comic. I think you're overreacting here.

You originally stated it had no effect on Galactus but now have since rescinded your point as usual.

It didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus. You can rest your laurels on a statement you decided to put into my mouth because you don't like how the comic reads. However you make yourself feel better has no bearing on what the comic states.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You retreated. End. Of. Don't be so butt-hurt over being called out on it. It wasn't my fault when you haphazardly dared me to point it out. It was your's. Next time, keep track of your own statements. It didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus. You can rest your laurels on a statement you decided to put into my mouth because you don't like how the comic reads. However you make yourself feel better has no bearing on what the comic states.
Enraging him proves it did effect him. Point proven you can now call your congressmen because you've just been served.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
He was enraged at being sent flying while not being harmed.

You can enrage Galactus without harming Galactus. And Thanos did just that, enraged him without harming him. He didn't have illusions he did anything more. Fin.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
He was enraged at being sent flying while not being harmed.

You can enrage Galactus without harming Galactus. And Thanos did just that, enraged him without harming him. He didn't have illusions he did anything more. Fin.

I could quote you over and over again saying he wasn't harmed.. and basing this on a line that I have proven is not what he was talking about. A very common line to make it known... yeah you hit him.. but really it did next to nothing and now you're going to pay. However, that line doesn't mean what you're saying it does because first that was his missino to accomplish.. he wasn't speaking about harming him.. he was there for a mission.. that mission failed.. he didn't accomplish convincing Galactus of anything only pissed him off.. Further, a line such as that doesn't mean somebody didn't harm another AT ALL, IN ANY WAY, it means in the end all it did was piss him off.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You retreated. End. Of. Don't be so butt-hurt over being called out on it. It wasn't my fault when you haphazardly dared me to point it out. It was your's. Next time, keep track of your own statements. It didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus. You can rest your laurels on a statement you decided to put into my mouth because you don't like how the comic reads. However you make yourself feel better has no bearing on what the comic states.

I called you out on your misquote.. and you come back with this lol. I said it did harm him because that is exactly what we see on panel. We see him worse off than before the blast. We actually see the damage on Galactus that proves it so. He looks worse after than before the blast. Period. You cannot get around that fact. You're attempts to change what I was saying failed. Him causing damage is exactly what I said he did and that is shown via artistic depiction. Now, that having a lasting damage or actually harming him in any significant way is totally different.

^ That's not a misquote. That's you retreating from your position. Get over the butt-hurt.

All it did was piss him off. Nothing more. Like Thanos states outright. And it isn't obvious that Thanos hurt him. In fact, it's the exact opposite. I understand why you retreated from your inital point. Because the comic portrays that.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Enraging him proves it did effect him. Point proven you can now call your congressmen because you've just been served.
Switching your terminology from "rocked him" to "affected him" doesn't change that your initial position is baseless and contrary to that which is portrayed. Enough with the gamesmanship. You're not clever enough, nor subtle enough to get that past anybody.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ That's not a misquote. That's you retreating from your position. Get over the butt-hurt.

All it did was piss him off. Nothing more. Like Thanos states outright. And it isn't obvious that Thanos hurt him. In fact, it's the exact opposite. I understand why you retreated from your inital point. Because the comic portrays that. Switching your terminology from "rocked him" to "affected him" doesn't change that your initial position is baseless and contrary to that which is portrayed. Enough with the gamesmanship. You're not clever enough, nor subtle enough to get that past anybody.

False I tooled your premise and conclusion with ease. You tried to post a quote and say Thanos was talking about any harm he did to galactus. When in fact, he wasn't talking about harm to Galactus at all.. he was talking about him not accomplishing what he set out to do and only pissed of Galactus. All the fleeting attempts to change that tooling is just that desperate... You tried to use a quote that was out of context.. I called you on it.. and now you're desperate to save face.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Can I see scans of the summoning Galactus and Eternity?
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/4608080/Chaos_War_2_017.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/4608102/Chaos_War_2_018.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/4608105/Chaos_War_2_020.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/4608106/Chaos_War_2_021.jpg.html

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
False I tooled your premise and conclusion with ease. You tried to post a quote and say Thanos was talking about any harm he did to galactus. When in fact, he wasn't talking about harm to Galactus at all.. he was talking about him not accomplishing what he set out to do and only pissed of Galactus. All the fleeting attempts to change that tooling is just that desperate... You tried to use a quote that was out of context.. I called you on it.. and now you're desperate to save face.
Ease? By retreating from your initial statement that Thanos obviously harmed Galactus? This isn't Bizarro-world.

Your arguments don't make sense at all at this point. Thanos wasn't talking about how his blast didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus? lolwut?

He can summon them, but whos to say they will fight for him? In those panels they did not.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Ease? By retreating from your initial statement that Thanos obviously harmed Galactus? This isn't Bizarro-world.

Your arguments don't make sense at all at this point. Thanos wasn't talking about how his blast didn't do anything more than enrage Galactus? lolwut?

Simple tooling question for ODG...

What was Thanos trying to accomplish by meeting with Galactus.. was he trying to harm him (that is what he was measuring and what he was trying to accomplish OR OR was he trying to get Galactus to listen to him and not release the hunger? Which one was it?

^ This isn't about whether Thanos meant to harm Galactus. This is about whether Thanos harmed Galactus to such an extent, he "rocked" him.

He didn't. You said it was obvious he did. You're holding out a loaded question that has nothing to do with whether or not Thanos harmed Galactus to such an extent, he "rocked" him. I might as well ask you what you ate for breakfast. Stick to the issue at hand.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ This isn't about whether Thanos meant to harm Galactus. This is about whether Thanos harmed Galactus to such an extent, he "rocked" him.

He didn't. You said it was obvious he did. You're holding out a loaded question that has nothing to do with whether or not Thanos harmed Galactus to such an extent, he "rocked" him. I might as well ask you what you ate for breakfast. Stick to the issue at hand.

Please provide ANY quote of mine in this thread where i said he rocked him... Trying to change the argument eh ODG? That desperate? Until you can provide ANY quote where I said he rocked him.. then we will continue this change in your argument. Until then, that quote you have of thanos in no way shape or form implies what harm he caused Galactus nor was that what he was trying to accomplish.

^ Don't blame me for your constant shifting around and mischaracterizations. This entire argument has always been about whether Thanos "rocked" him. I even stated outright that exact argument as soon as you replied with your off-topic arguments. You said it's obvious Thanos harmed him. Then you say, you never said that at all. Now you're trying to pigeon-hole this conversation about what Thanos' intentions were.

His intentions are irrelevant to whether Thanos rocked him or not. Irrelevant. Stop ascribing imaginary positions to me.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/4608080/Chaos_War_2_017.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/4608102/Chaos_War_2_018.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/4608105/Chaos_War_2_020.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/4608106/Chaos_War_2_021.jpg.html

Oh, that's not that impressive. Dr. Strange has done similar things.

Ummm....Herc is supposed to be skyfather now but lack feats. I need more feats from him but it is clear that Thanos is not a skyfather level.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ That's not a misquote. That's you retreating from your position. Get over the butt-hurt.

All it did was piss him off. Nothing more. Like Thanos states outright. And it isn't obvious that Thanos hurt him. In fact, it's the exact opposite. I understand why you retreated from your inital point. Because the comic portrays that. Switching your terminology from "rocked him" to "affected him" doesn't change that your initial position is baseless and contrary to that which is portrayed. Enough with the gamesmanship. You're not clever enough, nor subtle enough to get that past anybody.

It did rock him which also affected him you acted like it didn't affect him which is incorrect and my point stands once again.

Quit with the personal insults at the end of every post it's not needed just stick to the actual debate.

^ I'm acting like it didn't "rock" him. Because Thanos stated outright that all he did was enrage him and nothing more.

Irony.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ I'm acting like it didn't "rock" him. Because Thanos stated outright that all he did was enrage him and nothing more.

Irony.

It did rock him not enough to best Galactus though but you originally stated it didn't affect him which it most certainly did.

^ Obviously it wasn't enough to "best" Galactus. Because it didn't do anything more than to enrage him. And Thanos had no illusions otherwise. Your straw-man at the end there is irrelevant at this point.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Obviously it wasn't enough to "best" Galactus. Because it didn't do anything more than to enrage him. And Thanos had no illusions otherwise. Your straw-man at the end there is irrelevant at this point.
I never said it was I stated it affected him or rocked him which it did.