Thanos vs Herculese (current)

Started by KuRuPT Thanosi15 pages
Originally posted by The Nuul
But regardless of the Galactus fight, Thanos no matter how much Quan twists shit around, he is not skyfarher. He lost to Odin and he 'll lose to current Herc.

Thanos is Skyfather... Low end maybe but Skyfather none the less

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Thanos is Skyfather... Low end maybe but Skyfather none the less

No hes not.

Untill Herc has some good feats, Thanos wins.

Originally posted by Nihilist
Untill Herc has some good feats, Thanos wins.

So trouncing a bunch of Skyfathers/Trans Tiers simultaneously and stopping time on a global scale aren't 'good feats'?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
So trouncing a bunch of Skyfathers/Trans Tiers simultaneously and stopping time on a global scale aren't 'good feats'?
Stopping time is ok, but the beating up Skyfathers with punches isnt a great feat as non of them themself have any great feats.

Each member of the Council possesses magical and cosmic power on a scale comparable to even the Elder Gods and certain cosmic beings, far dwarfing that of a Sorcerer Supreme's might. Total Members: 20 (approximately)

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Bios mean jack shit, they need some feats to back it up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Each term applies to the situation whereas you claimed his blast didn't affect him at which isn't true in the slightest.
The blast didn't rock him. Unfortunately you can't ignore that Thanos stated outright that he didn't do anything more than enrage him. And your straw-manning wholly relies on your own equivocations and lack of consistency in your own posts. That's your fault, not our's.

Nice back-pedaling. When you decide to forward-pedal, let us know.

Originally posted by The Nuul
No hes not.
Yes he is.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
The blast didn't rock him. Unfortunately you can't ignore that Thanos stated outright that he didn't do anything more than enrage him. And your straw-manning wholly relies on your own equivocations and lack of consistency in your own posts. That's your fault, not our's.

Nice back-pedaling. When you decide to forward-pedal, let us know.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ There was no other effect. Because all the attack did was enrage him. It's right there in black and white. On-panel. Had it also harmed Galactus in addition to enraging him, Thanos wouldn't have said what he said. You shouldn't ignore what's written here. Particularly when Thanos himself explains it.
Keep backpedaling. There was an effect hence him being enraged and being sent back a few football fields. You state no effect now want to distance yourself from this statement so I decided to show you what you said you seem to have a short term memory.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Yes he is.
Originally posted by The Nuul
No hes not.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
The blast didn't rock him. Unfortunately you can't ignore that Thanos stated outright that he didn't do anything more than enrage him. And your straw-manning wholly relies on your own equivocations and lack of consistency in your own posts. That's your fault, not our's.

Nice back-pedaling. When you decide to forward-pedal, let us know.

In Quans mind, if someone is knocked down or flying back etc.....Its classed as being rocked regardless if that character is not hurt at all.

Originally posted by The Nuul
This is what getting "rocked" means.

YouTube video

Originally posted by The Nuul
In Quans mind, if someone is knocked down or flying back etc.....Its classed as being rocked regardless if that character is not hurt at all.
If you are going to continue to post about me at least give up this ruse of ignoring me. Irl people are rocked by a lot less than flying back hundreds of yards. watch any ufc to which people can recover quickly from being rocked and win a fight. This isn't brain science. Wow.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Keep backpedaling. There was an effect hence him being enraged and being sent back a few football fields. You state no effect now want to distance yourself from this statement so I decided to show you what you said you seem to have a short term memory.
Your "effect" was that he was "rocked." This is your wording. Don't blame me for using your switched up terminology. That's your own fault.

How ironic that you're criticizing the different terminologies and the switching and back-pedaling from them... when that's exactly what you did.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Your "effect" was that he was "rocked." Don't blame me for using you switched up terminology. That's your own fault.
You stated he had no effect on Galactus. He clearly did. Just admit you were wrong here.

Originally posted by The Nuul
Originally posted by Black bolt z
Yes he is.

Thanos is a low skyfather but a skyfather none-the-less.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You stated he had no effect on Galactus. He clearly did. Just admit you were wrong here.
Your use of the word "effected" was that he "rocked" Galactus. I'm sorry that you are now bashing your own rhetoric here. It wasn't mine to begin with. kinda

This thread got real stupid real quick.

What the hell? This thread isn't about Thanos VS. Galactus (Galactus stomps BTW) It's Thanos Vs. Hercules.

Originally posted by thanos-prime
This thread got real stupid real quick.

Par for the course for pretty much any Thanos thread.