Who can last the longest against Thanos?

Started by OneDumbG06 pages

^ Your statement was so profound. I think I'll change my opinion that he was doing nothing but trolling from the beginning rather than engaging in discussing the viability of anti matter working against Thanos.

No wait. Never mind. I'm not going to waste time asking him 5 times to provide evidence that whatever extra recovery he believes was still available would make a difference.

Give me an argument and I'll argue it. Give me a troll and I'll call it a troll. You can find Mr. Magnanimous elsewhere.

I really don't care how it started odg. I'm just calling it as I see it and he still makes his argument and you for two pages have been attacking him...

You both make sound arguments either way but the fact is noone other than the writers can say what his level is and whether if would or would nit affect thanos again...

And the writers never state thanos is fully recovered only that he has regained enough of his strength to prevent further mental intrusion... That's not a clear statement either way...

And your argument that he didn't appear injures doesn't make him 100% any more than the argument that he didn't appear to be weak...

^ You not bothering to see how it started and how it deteriorated into pure trolling justifies your narrow opinion of a single post?

He has no argument. He insists that at one point, Thanos was disoriented two issues before the event in question. I haven't argued that. But apparently, I need to reminded of it and berated for acting like I argued against that fact over and over repeatedly over several pages. Whatever argument he's got is a negative proof fallacy: it isn't 100% sure that it would work.

It's not 100% sure that it wouldn't work. That isn't my argument, that's just me throwing his negative proof fallacy back at his face. I want no part of that fallacious horsepoo but I don't mind illustrating how fallacious it is to rebut someone trolling me with it. At some point maybe this discussion might turn back to the viability of anti-matter working. We haven't reached that point.

We're still at Raging Bleeding Butt Defcon 4.

I've read the entire thread and I said it appears the last two pages were you getting away from fact and spending too much time attacking kt. Obviously you let him get to you. Your argument is he has no argument... And his argument is there is no clear answer. Whether you or him continue to dwell on that single argument for the next 40 pages go ahead. Just informing you that you are contributing the same as him but in an opposite fashion

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Give me an argument and I'll argue it. Give me a troll and I'll call it a troll. You can find Mr. Magnanimous elsewhere.

Back to topic... Is Loki allowed to summon the Norn stones? If so I'll lean towards Loki.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ You not bothering to see how it started and how it deteriorated into pure trolling justifies your narrow opinion of a single post?

He has no argument. He insists that at one point, Thanos was disoriented two issues before the event in question. I haven't argued that. But apparently, I need to reminded of it and berated for acting like I argued against that fact over and over repeatedly over several pages. Whatever argument he's got is a negative proof fallacy: it isn't 100% sure that it would work.

It's not 100% sure that it wouldn't work. That isn't my argument, that's just me throwing his negative proof fallacy back at his face. I want no part of that fallacious horsepoo but I don't mind illustrating how fallacious it is to rebut someone trolling me with it. At some point maybe this discussion might turn back to the viability of anti-matter working. We haven't reached that point.

We're still at Raging Bleeding Butt Defcon 4.

False again… You said it DID work on Thanos.. but left off the fact that he was weakened.. a very very key factor here. You and others said.. Thanos was also vulnerable to anti-matter.. again false.. that is proven… you acting like stuff is a fact, when it's not, is why I'm here correcting you. A weakened Thanos being killed by an anitmatter device DOESN'T prove a normal Thanos is vulnerable nor that it would work. Your assumption and speculation is why I'm here, not the other way around. You are the only one use a no limits fallacy and negative proof fallacy. You acting like he's vulnerable isn't true.. there is zero proof he is vulnerable because he was weakened.

Your fallacies come into play when you say he was recovered enough… how do you know this.. yes he was recovering that doesn't mean he was FULLY recovered does it? An actually, we have a statement RIGHT BEFORE the blast which favors my side over yours. You lack of reading comprehension doesn't change that fact. It said he recovered ENOUGH.. not fully recovered… not at full strength.. he's recovered enough.. then only a tool like you would go… see he was recovering.. duh you twit.. nobody is disputing this fact and I certainly never have. Recovering is A LOT different then being at 100%. So.. the statement right before the blast favors me and that he wasn't at 100% still. What further favors me is when he did come back she could still read his mind and sense his pain and emotions… We've seen moondragon with the mind gem not even be able to penetrate his mind when he's at normal levels. Yet, she could read it that easy… That would also favor my theory. Thanks for playing though. Now onto why it probably wouldn't work..

1. We've seen Thanos take A LOT more than this little device in his history. I won't waste time listing the times but it's clear he can take much more. Now then, why would this be.. hmmm he's weakened is a very good possiblity as to why… Actually, his durability was even said not to be at normal levels which is separate than his physical and mental state which were also compromised. If Thanos has taken a gas giant, a black hole and countless shots from exponentially more powerful people than this little device.. I think it's clear why it worked… he was weakened and his durability isn't at normal levels as stated on panel.

2. Now why would your mental state be a factor here… well… Thanos is one of the smartest in marvel.. he has won countless fights by outsmarting people.. Yet if this is compromised is he going to fight at peak levels… nope.. In fact, if he was the device might not have ever been placed there in the first place. Lets continue that line of thought.. When you have total control of your molecular structure.. how do you go about using that ability and making any necessary repairs that might need doing.. hmmmmm…. lets think.. your mind huh? That would be a key factor in utilizing this ability wouldn't it.. Well if his mind is compromised and not at full power.. this would mean this ability that could've prevented this wasn't working at full power. We've seen him at the nexus of realities and his body constantly repairing itself… Not only do we have a healing factor which could've been comprised via his weakness.. we have his durability which was flat out stated to be compromised… we also have his mental state not all being there.. even if it was recovering we have a specific on panel statement saying THAT universe makes it hard for him to concentrate. There is zero indication this had to do with his weakened state, in fact, it could just be how that universe would also affect him. So if his mental state is compromised… he won't fight as well.. and won't be able to use a key ability that might have prevented him from being killed.

^ We get it. You're butt-hurt. Try a tampon. Might bring you down to Bloody Butt Dripping Defcon 3.

...

Is higher or lower numbers better or worse for defcons?

Originally posted by rotiart
Back to topic... Is Loki allowed to summon the Norn stones? If so I'll lean towards Loki.
I think the thread-starter was thinking more individual combat than prep/amp-based.

defcon 1 is full scale war mobilization, or full rectal dam burst

Kurupt and ODG, stop the flaming and trolling. Next time it's a warning.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ We get it. You're butt-hurt. Try a tampon. Might bring you down to Bloody Butt Dripping Defcon 3.

...

Is higher or lower numbers better or worse for defcons? I think the thread-starter was thinking more individual combat than prep/amp-based.

Funny enough.... I told you exactly why him being weakened would have multiple consequences that could explain what happened. That is what you said you want to continue the discussion.. yet you then go run and hide... Ownage.

Originally posted by Badabing
Kurupt and ODG, stop the flaming and trolling. Next time it's a warning.
Bada why did your rig the votes.Thats the only way GG could be winning 😠

^ Reported for suggesting those votes were rigged. crackers

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Funny enough.... I told you exactly why him being weakened would have multiple consequences that could explain what happened. That is what you said you want to continue the discussion.. yet you then go run and hide... Ownage.
🙄

Your attempts to project a crippling vulnerability were repetitive, boring and baseless. Moreover, they were based wholly in a circular argument fallacy:

The anti-matter only worked because his durability was lessened.

His durability was clearly lessened, because the anti-matter mine worked.

Doesn't take several meandering and rambling paragraphs to rebut that.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Reported for suggesting those votes were rigged. crackers 🙄

Your attempts to project a crippling vulnerability were repetitive, boring and baseless. Moreover, they were based wholly in a circular argument fallacy:

The anti-matter only worked because his durability was lessened.

His durability was clearly lessened, because the anti-matter mine worked.

Doesn't take several meandering and rambling paragraphs to rebut that.

Come one ODG.Yours and Quans debates were funny.But debating with KT?

Now it just seems...Factual. You sicken me ahuh