OneDumbG0
Find Your Own Fire
Originally posted by cdtm
This is the only part that matters:No. Period.
Thor handling speedsters, does not prove he is as fast as speedsters, if that's your argument. (And since you brought up Wonder Woman vs Slade, a clear cut case of PIS with Slade matching WW, I can't see what other point you're trying to make.)
It is the only part that matters.
I'm not trying to prove Thor is a speedster. Just that he handles them with consistency. From low speedsters to high-end speedsters. And you obviously did miss the point. How can people keep acting like consistent speed feats are the end-all, be-all (even though they job to non-speedsters), but characters who have consistent feats against speedsters are irrelevant (because they sometimes job to non-speedsters)?
Do people act like Thor being toppled by Cap means he can't possibly take a Thng-level hit? Even though he consistently does?
Do people act like Thor being blasted by a generic laser gun means he can't possibly take a Silver Surfer-level blast? Even though he consistently does?
Somehow, speed can never be treated with the same level of consideration as strength and durability consistently are. For strength and durability, this consideration is unconscious. When it comes to speed though? There has to be some overly zealous equivocation over it. It's retarded.
Originally posted by cdtm
Using that criteria, Slade becomes >>> Wally West, which is ridiculous.
sam