Mr Majestic vs Thor

Started by Galan0078 pages

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
When I think of no selling someone, I picture the Thor/Iron Man battle during JMS' run. Majestic punked him no doubt but I wouldn't call it no selling a character, particularly because he had advantage on his side. If Tao attacked Majestic to absolutely no effect before he charged him, then the definition would fit. At least as I understand it.

There's no doubt that the blades would be able to cut Thor. I never said otherwise.

Hopefully. I kind of gave up on Wildstorm right before that era.

I see what you're saying. I'm just thinking of what actually happened: 1.) Majestic (w/ the element of surprise) slices TAO's hands off. 2.) TAO talks some shit. 3.) Majestic shoves both swords down his throat. 4.) TAO is totally immobilized... I guess it doesn't really matter either way. It's semantics at this point. 😉

Cool. I didn't think you had, but I haven't been keeping up with this thread much.

As a whole, WildCATS v5 was very enjoyable, imo.

Originally posted by Galan007
I see what you're saying. I'm just thinking of what actually happened: 1.) Majestic (w/ the element of surprise) slices TAO's hands off. 2.) TAO talks some shit. 3.) Majestic shoves both swords down his throat. 4.) TAO is totally immobilized... I guess it doesn't really matter either way. It's semantics at this point. 😉

Cool. I didn't think you had, but I haven't been keeping up with this thread much.

As a whole, WildCATS v5 was very enjoyable, imo.

Fair enough. I'd just call it punking or owning instead of no selling. As that (At least to me) gives me the impression that the character retaliated to no effect. But whatever, like you said, semantics.

That's alright.

You better be right.

facepalm

Someone reported a single poster 9 times, and the posts were over a day old.

I appreciate reports, but 9 separate reports within a few minutes for the same poster is too much.

It looks like there was a heated debate Friday/Saturday. I saw some antagonism but nothing too bad.

I confess... I reported ODG just for the lulz.

I hate him so much. uhuh

ohno

sneer

😂

But chumper is banned?

Originally posted by Galan007
I confess... I reported ODG just for the lulz.

I hate him so much. uhuh

Reported 10 times.

Originally posted by Galan007
I see what you're saying. I'm just thinking of what actually happened: 1.) Majestic (w/ the element of surprise) slices TAO's hands off. 2.) TAO talks some shit. 3.) Majestic shoves both swords down his throat. 4.) TAO is totally immobilized... I guess it doesn't really matter either way. It's semantics at this point. 😉

Cool. I didn't think you had, but I haven't been keeping up with this thread much.

As a whole, WildCATS v5 was very enjoyable, imo.


Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Fair enough. I'd just call it punking or owning instead of no selling. As that (At least to me) gives me the impression that the character retaliated to no effect. But whatever, like you said, semantics.

That's alright.

You better be right.

Right! nothing but Semantics.

Like Thor losing to Majestros in h2h. Thor has nothing to equalize the speed disadvantage, with all other factors stacking to each other or Majestros again edging out Odinson.

To build an arguments against it, would be dragged out into arguing semantic scenes which does little address Thor's short coming.

Point. Blank. Period.

Re: Mr Majestic vs Thor

Originally posted by CosmicComet

vs

1. Majestic gets his sword that can cut through virtually anything, Thor
keeps Mjolnir

2. Majestic without his sword, Thor keeps Mjonir

3. No weapons for either

1- Majestic
2- Thor
3- majestic

Re: Mr Majestic vs Thor

Originally posted by CosmicComet

vs

1. Majestic gets his sword that can cut through virtually anything, Thor
keeps Mjolnir

2. Majestic without his sword, Thor keeps Mjonir

3. No weapons for either

1 Majestic
2 Thor
3 Thor

Originally posted by "Id"
Right! nothing but Semantics.

Like Thor losing to Majestros in h2h. Thor has nothing to equalize the speed disadvantage, with all other factors stacking to each other or Majestros again edging out Odinson.

To build an arguments against it, would be dragged out into arguing semantic scenes which does little address Thor's short coming.

Point. Blank. Period.

Talking about the history of the two in regards to speed is semantics?

Okay then.

Originally posted by Naija boy
1- Majestic
2- Thor
3- majestic

👆

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Talking about the history of the two in regards to speed is semantics?

Okay then.

Re: Re: Mr Majestic vs Thor

Originally posted by "Id"
1 Majestic
2 With
3 Ease

Re: Re: Mr Majestic vs Thor

Originally posted by the Darkone
1 Majestic
2 Thor
3 Thor

Re: Re: Re: Mr Majestic vs Thor

Originally posted by "Id"

Hey everybody has there own opinion!

Re: Re: Re: Mr Majestic vs Thor

Originally posted by cdtm

😂 Nice!

1. I don't understand why giving Majestic a bladed weapon automatically means a win in the minds of others (Not necessarily in this thread). His faced everyone from the Executioner to an amped Perrikus. That being said, this can go either way. Probably leaning to Thor if he doesn't fight like a dumb brute but he'd be cut up something fierce.
2. Thor.
3. Stalemate.

Because someone with Majestic speed and a blade that will cut Thor like butter equals win for Majestic.

Thor has fought many, many super and "Godly" characters who had bladed weapons. he is still here.

Thor has been shown to have any speed, reaction and strength levels that he needs to fight an opponent. Regardless of the lack of in-depth descriptions of Thor's speed abilities, they have still be touched upon, commented upon and narrated upon in his books.

That being said, it is incorrect to discuss him as unable to deal with top-tier speedsters, even if he has not officially been labelled as one.

Thor is one of the most durable characters in comics. Period. We aren't talking about a cheesy healing factor. When Thor goes at it with a top-tier, he usually comes away with less damage, while his opponents are either healing quickly, or sleeping soundly.

As for strength and power go, it has been shown over and over, that there really are no limits to the strength levels he can achieve, the power levels he can access, or what he can do with that power.

Finally, Thor has, at least, thousands of years of experience as a warrior. Usually, when he has problems with an opponent, it is because he has become accustomed to holding back, since being sent to earth and humbled by Odin so many years ago.

Let's be honest, Thor is what Superman would be, if you gave Clark a magic hammer and access to vast, exotic and mystic powers.

Majestic is a whole new beast that Thor has faced, IMO. Yes, Thor has faced villains/heroes with weapons. But has Thor faced someone with Majestic's level of speed, intelligence, fighting ability, and strength to compare? If so, when?