Mr Majestic vs Thor

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Wolverine fighting Thor is not PIS, of course. Welcome to Bizarro-world. Guess what? You never left. I like how Thor beating the overwhelming majority of the speedsters he's faced throuhout his career is PIS. Yeah... good job.

I would argue that in comics in general, when a speedster loses to someone much slower, that PIS is in play. So this isn't unique to Thor.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Wolverine fighting Thor is not PIS, of course. Welcome to Bizarro-world. Guess what? You never left. No, you didn't You've focused completely on speed feats and ironically have offered complete non-proof to counter Thor's career against speedsters.

Thanks again for highlighting how your obsession over speed feats ends up completely defeating your own rhetoric. Being a speedster means you win. Defeating speedsters doesn't mean anything because it's always PIS (unless you're a DC character). So original.

Who's deflecting here? I asked you out of the 3 scenerio's given by the original poster what do you see as the outcome?

I also said as a display over a character's career Majestic is far more geared to speed in fights then Thor. Thor has like 4500 showings and ppl use the same what 10 responses as a counter to speed. You don't find that to be odd in itself?

Stop out talking yourself and answer the simple question: given the fights with the standards set by the original poster what do you see as the outcome?

Mr Majestic vs Thor

vs

1. Majestic gets his sword that can cut through virtually anything, Thor
keeps Mjolnir

2. Majestic without his sword, Thor keeps Mjonir

3. No weapons for either

In case you forgot since you like to argue rather then answer simple questions.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Who's deflecting here? I asked you out of the 3 scenerio's given by the original poster what do you see as the outcome?

Originally posted by snowdragon
I also said as a display over a character's career Majestic is far more geared to speed in fights then Thor. Thor has like 4500 showings and ppl use the same what 10 responses as a counter to speed. You don't find that to be odd in itself?

Originally posted by snowdragon
Stop out talking yourself and answer the simple question: given the fights with the standards set by the original poster what do you see as the outcome?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Jeez. Let me say it out loud: You are. You have been deflecting from every single argument I've presented to you over your insipid defenses that Majestic somehow must overwhelm Thor with his superspeed. Now I'm repeating myself: All the superspeed characters that Thor has defeated also were far more geared to speed in fights than Thor. And what did that mean when Thor beat them? Keep deflecting. Majestic has no career of overwhelming high herald characters like Thor. Thor has a career of countering/defeating/outright embarrassing superspeedsters. Somehow, Thor gets overwhelmed. By non-feats. By a non-career. Faaaan-tastic.

Just answer the simple question:

Mr Majestic vs Thor

vs

1. Majestic gets his sword that can cut through virtually anything, Thor
keeps Mjolnir

2. Majestic without his sword, Thor keeps Mjonir

3. No weapons for either

^ Running away from the argument leads nowhere. I suppose I was overly ambitious when I thought a constructive discussion was going to take place here. I should have realized it pages back when you kept citing to Majestic's imaginary and fake career of overwhelming high heralds like Thor with his superspeed when I mentioned Thor's long career of countering/defeating/outright embarrassing superspeedsters.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Running away from the argument leads nowhere. I suppose I was overly ambitious when I thought a constructive discussion was going to take place here. I should have realized it pages back when you kept citing to Majestic's imaginary and fake career of overwhelming high heralds like Thor with his superspeed when I mentioned Thor's long career of countering/defeating/outright embarrassing superspeedsters.

It's ironic that most of your defensive posting reflects best on your tactics to discuss a topic.

If it were just "super speed" then we could him and haw about how Thor does or doesn't handle it, however given the rest of Majestics abilities and attitude is where the fight starts and ends.

You chose to nit pick and never once answered the original poster's question, does that in fact make you a troll to the post when asked over and over again to respond to the initial thread topic?

^ What? That when you wanted to talk about feats, I started talking about Thor's entire career of feats against superspeedsters and somehow they don't count? Or that I started asking about Majestic's actual feats against high heralds like Thor and somehow they don't exist but that doesn't matter?

Whatever. You like to refuse to actually discuss the arguments at hand, repeat a thread's topic and pretend that your butt-hurt is a victimization and trolling.

This discussion is over. I'm bored.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0

This discussion is over. I'm bored.

We never even had a discussion, you never answered the question.

Also you're antogonistic name calling is the epitome of trolling.

I specifically stated why using absolute feats are worthless with the number of showings of each character, you need to keep up man.

^ I attempted to have a discussion. You brought up feats in the abstract, assuming I'd take your baseless crap at face value. I brought up on-panel feats, half-expecting you'd take those on-panel feats at face value (since y'know... they actually exist). Then you didn't want to discuss feats anymore. Hell, you didn't even have feats to discuss in the first place.

Waah.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ I attempted to have a discussion. You brought up feats in the abstract. I brought up on-panel feats. Then you didn't want to discuss feats. Hell, you didn't even have feats to discuss in the first place.

Waah.

There wasn't a discussion to be had, you never answered the original posters question.

^ I countered all your limp statements. You attempted to defend them. Stress, "attempted." Now you're deflecting onto something that you didn't even bother to bring up a dozen posts after we began our discussion. As if that's what we were discussing the entire time.

Y'know that stinking pile or brown matter you've been shoveling for the last dozen posts? Yeah. Whatever. I've learned to walk away from it when it's stacked that high.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ I countered all your limp statements. You attempted to defend them. Stress, "attempted." Now you're deflecting onto something that you didn't even bother to bring up a dozen posts after we began our discussion. As if that's what we were discussing the entire time.

Y'know that stinking pile or brown matter you've been shoveling for the last dozen posts? Yeah. Whatever. I've learned to walk away from it when it's stacked that high.

I don't even know what you are walking away from, you have attempted to troll with name calling, belittling etc and never answered the original posters question. I answered you several times and you just never got what you wanted since you wanted to argue I didn't.

Save you're psuedo intellect for real matters and not comics just answer the question.

^ He said this, he said that. Waah. We were starting to discuss feats. I like how you're pretending that you actually continued that discussion.

But yeah, this faux maturity you're trying to project over a comic conversation isn't predictable. Oh... we were talking about comics this entire time? My god. Thanks, Captain Obvious. That I'm mildly disappointed over the fact that you couldn't walk away from a conversation over superspeed, when you had superspeed feats thrown in your face and the lack of superspeed thrown in your face, without being some elitist snubbing his nose at the juvenile nature over the conversation isn't me being a bad guy.

It's the intarnetz. We've all been on it. I'm not expecting you to be graceful about it. I never should have, really. The pretending though; it's fairly obvious. And, once again, boring.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ He said this, he said that. Waah. We were starting to discuss feats. I like how you're pretending that you actually continued that discussion.

But yeah, this faux maturity you're trying to project over a comic conversation isn't predictable. Oh... we were talking about comics this entire time? My god. Thanks, Captain Obvious. That I'm mildly disappointed over the fact that you couldn't walk away from a conversation over superspeed, when you had superspeed feats thrown in your face and the lack of superspeed thrown in your face, without being some elitist snubbing his nose at the juvenile nature over the conversation isn't me being a bad guy.

It's the intarnetz. We've all been on it. I'm not expecting you to be graceful about it. I never should have, really.

Once again, just answer the question.

^ Once again, pretend you ever had anything to discuss in the first place and be disappointed that you never actually did. That fact isn't my fault. And I wasn't the first, or the only one, who brought it up.

I think we can all agree that the creation blades, are powerful as is. Adding any more properties to it, would be overkill.

Of the top of my mind, these blades ignore durability. They will cut through any matter. They pierced through an energy barrier like nothing. And that's where the second property comes into play. The ability to repeal any form of energy.

Thats why these weapons are soo dangerous under capable hands, like say Majestic.

Edit

Oh since we are on the topic of super speed countering. Lets get this one scenerio cleared.

Thor never countered Sentry while in a speed blitz. Yes he was hammer bashed, but that was Sentry walking up to him. Huge difference.

Jesus f'n Christ.

This forum loves super speed like Jerry Sandusky loves little boys.

Thor has a consistent history of countering/reacting to opponents with superspeed. He doesn't have random one off feats but a consistent history of it. He also has a history of reacting far beyond what the norm is for a human. Majestic doesn't have a history of using the legendary KMC "speed blitz/combo-to-ko/too fast to be hit" strategem on characters, let alone people on Thor's level or above. And yet...

We're supposed to abitrarily assume Thor will be relegated to his low end showings of speed feats and Majestic will be way damn too fast for Thor react and use speed he's, quite frankly, never used in the context of how people are arguing for him? And subsequently, all of Thor's speed feats or instances of faring well to outright beating people with explicit superspeed is PIS?

That's phucking retarded, sorry. Everything ODG said is correct on that front.

Majestic.

Thor.

Toss up.

1. Majestic gets his sword that can cut through virtually anything, Thor
keeps Mjolnir

2. Majestic without his sword, Thor keeps Mjonir

3. No weapons for either

1. Maj, with ease.

2. Maj, with less ease.

3. Maj, with more ease than 2, but less ease than 1.

IMHO.

Originally posted by snowdragon
You are simply trying to manipulate me into an argument that I already stated the outcome to, you on the other hand have evaded it with every post.

It's a simple question you never answer out of all my posts, out of the 3 fights what are your opinions on the outcome?

alright so if you dont want to answer him because he is avoiding your questions then answer me please, who did majestic beat that can be considered on thor level?