Originally posted by Silent MasterYou can't prove how powerful any blast is on face value because there's no magic meter indicating which is more powerful when it hits a character. I mean don't you understand that trying to troll someone about proving something you can't either way while dismissing all relevant info regarding both incidents to come up with the most logical conclusion is the only way.
No, it's attempting to move the discussion forward, you making claims and then refusing to back them up is trolling.
🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
You can't prove how powerful any blast is on face value because there's no magic meter indicating which is more powerful when it hits a character. I mean don't you understand that trying to troll someone about proving something you can't either way while dismissing all relevant info regarding both incidents to come up with the most logical conclusion is the only way.🙂
If you can't prove that the blast was more powerful than Odin, then you can't use it as proof that Thanos has tanked an attack more powerful than Odin is capable of.
Originally posted by Black bolt zYes, we can because we can use logical thinking to deduce as much. The Magus who acclimated very quickly to the ig faster than Thanos used it so the only logical conclusion based on this evidence is it was much more powerful than a mere skyfather.
Exactly.So don't claim it was.You have no proof.
Originally posted by Silent MasterI already explained my reasoning as to why. Do you disagree with the Magus as being less powerful than Odin with an incomplete ig at the time ?
If you can't prove that the blast was more powerful than Odin, then you can't use it as proof that Thanos has tanked an attack more powerful than Odin is capable of.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, we can because we can use logical thinking to deduce as much. The Magus who acclimated very quickly to the ig faster than Thanos used it so the only logical conclusion based on this evidence is it was much more powerful than a mere skyfather.
Speculation isn't proof.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I already explained my reasoning as to why. Do you disagree with the Magus as being less powerful than Odin with an incomplete ig at the time ?
Your speculation based opinion isn't proof.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I asked your opinion most of the time speculation is the only way to prove anything. Most of this is opinion based unless a writer decides to put something down. Are you new here ?
If you want to claim that the blast was more powerful, you have to actually prove it, and no, speculation isn't proof.
Originally posted by quanchi112Yet you just said
Yes, we can because we can use logical thinking to deduce as much. The Magus who acclimated very quickly to the ig faster than Thanos used it so the only logical conclusion based on this evidence is it was much more powerful than a mere skyfather.
Originally posted by quanchi112
How can you prove which blast was more powerful ?
So you just contridicted yourself.
Silent... much like you did on Herochat.. you want people to prove stuff that is based on speculation from either party. You can't prove Odin's blast were more powerful than Magus with the IG.. you can't come close to proving this, yet you ask others to prove the same thing. The fact is, common sense tells us, the IG wtfpwns odin with ease.. I doubt a IG user would even view Odin as a threat... He is nowhere to be found once the big boys are called to fight IG. Thus, if you ask me which I would want to take on and feel can dish out more punishment..I would and most would choose the IG...It's realy that simple
Originally posted by Silent MasterI already gave my reasoning as to why I believe so you just want to repeat yourself. You're known for this on herochat but this is kmc.
If you want to claim that the blast was more powerful, you have to actually prove it, and no, speculation isn't proof.
Originally posted by Black bolt zWrong. I sai dthere is no way to definitively prove it but one can offer evidence as to why one believes a certain way. Same thing with Superman or Hulk who is stronger. You can't prove either just offer evidence.
Yet you just saidSo you just contridicted yourself.
I mean this isn't hard to grasp.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Silent... much like you did on Herochat.. you want people to prove stuff that is based on speculation from either party. You can't prove Odin's blast were more powerful than Magus with the IG.. you can't come close to proving this, yet you ask others to prove the same thing. The fact is, common sense tells us, the IG wtfpwns odin with ease.. I doubt a IG user would even view Odin as a threat... He is nowhere to be found once the big boys are called to fight IG. Thus, if you ask me which I would want to take on and feel can dish out more punishment..I would and most would choose the IG...It's realy that simple
I want people to back up their claims, if he can't do so, he has no business making the claim
Originally posted by quanchi112
I already gave my reasoning as to why I believe so you just want to repeat yourself. You're known for this on herochat but this is kmc.Wrong. I sai dthere is no way to definitively prove it but one can offer evidence as to why one believes a certain way. Same thing with Superman or Hulk who is stronger. You can't prove either just offer evidence.
I mean this isn't hard to grasp.
Again, your speculation isn't proof. I asked for proof.
Originally posted by Silent MasterNo, you're known for this on herochat and repeating yourself in an endless loop avoiding all questions won't fly here.
I want people to back up their claims, if he can't do so, he has no business making the claimAgain, your speculation isn't proof. I asked for proof.