Originally posted by skekUng
I'm not impressed by all of it.
I'm not either, but thanks for letting me know as I was dying to know how my "extensive" glibe response would be seen by you.
Originally posted by skekUng
Very nice link. Now give us one that illustrates how Mitt Romeny had better positions and how they're at all reconcilable with what an adequate job Mr. Obama has, is and will do in your opinion. Where is that link to the site that tells us how Mr. Romey's positions were a better fit for America. I don't need to be convinced that mr. Obama is doing a good job, but I did ask how he's "at all" when compared to your real choice, Mr. Romney.
http://www.ontheissues.org/mitt_romney.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Mitt_Romney
I will not discuss with you which portions I agree with and which I do not as I do not like you and I think you're a troll.
Originally posted by skekUng
I'm not sure why I expected a more complex answer from someone who called me a 'sock troll' [b]and 'too new to respond to', in the same post.[/B]
lol
as if my pseudo-code was a simple response. That was probably the most complex answer you've ever received to any trolling political question you've asked.
Originally posted by skekUng
If your next answer involves using your name as a brand, then I'll appreciate you not wasting my time.
Go find someone else to troll.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I will not discuss with you which portions I agree with and which I do not as I do not like you and I think you're a troll.Go find someone else to troll.
If you are unwilling to discuss the specifics, then your entire assertion that he would have been the better president is a waste of your time, not mine.
Also, you're coming across as paranoid. If you've really expereinced that many trolls, then there might be something wrong with your posting style that makes people troll you. I've been on forums long enough to know that the people who get trolled the most are typically half the problem, themselves.
If you can't respond to a question without hurling accusations in the hopes that the moderators will just pick up on them and ban me simply because you're paranoid, then save yourself the time and effort and report me. OR, participate in the discussion and be willing to understand that everything you say isn't well-thought out and insightful, and won't be accepted simply because you said it. Not everyone that disagrees with you is automatically a troll. Standing on a soap box in the corner and screaming about trolls and socks is really a lazy way to participate in a discussion, and it gives you the leeway to never have to back up anything you say. Granted, you don't put much effort into discussing anything, as it is. You make an assertion, post a wiki link or two, say you hate me and won't be discussing anything from the massive and vague information found on your link and then start insulting.
So, let's just both just shit the hell up and avoid one another.
Originally posted by King Kandy
They were corrupted before they ran.
Anyway, the point stands: Sarah Palin is quite clever and manipulative. The idea that she is "stupid" is fed by the media, and liberal retards eat that shit up. ROFL SHE SAID NORTH KOREA IS OUR ALLY. And quickly corrected herself. It's like when Dubya almost said that the Bicentennial was in 1776 but caught himself midsentence. HURRR HE'S DUMB.
And this is because liberals are incapable of critical thinking.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I used to have an Iranian-American employee, and he said that most of them hate their govt and that many individuals in Iran are pretty liberal despite the news and their embarrassing nutcase president.
AJE had a report on Tehran, and they were saying that there is as much plastic surgery there as in southern california
Originally posted by King Kandy
They weren't "potentially" corrupted, they were 100% corrupted already. Their platforms already make that obvious. When nobody's personal views are pure, the only thing we can judge them on is their issues; every corporatist on the republican ticket already loses that by default.
Originally posted by inimalist
AJE had a report on Tehran, and they were saying that there is as much plastic surgery there as in southern california
Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Prove it.
Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
And this is because liberals are incapable of critical thinking.
Shirley, you have to have another group you think so little of as to repeat yourself over and over again.
"Constant development is the law of life, and a man who always tries to maintain his dogmas in order to appear consistent drives himself into a false position." -even when his position is everything except (______).
Originally posted by skekUng
Shirley, you have to have another group you think so little of as to repeat yourself over and over again."Constant development is the law of life, and a man who always tries to maintain his dogmas in order to appear consistent drives himself into a false position." -even when his position is everything except (______).
Maybe "Zeal Ex Nihilo" is actually a sock of Ann Coulter? A lot of his posts are almost verbatim of lines in her books How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must) and If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans.
Who'd have thunk that she had the time to post on a forum so often...
Originally posted by King Kandy
lol, i'm not going to waste my time trying to "prove" anything to you. You make clear every time you post "liberals are retarded", "liberalism is a mental illness", "incapable of critical thinking", etc, that you have absolutely zero intention of trying to have a productive discussion with the vast majority of people on this site. I decline to take part in your mental masturbation, thank you very much.