Green Lantern Hal vs. Gladiator at peak confidence

Originally posted by -Pr-

a simple yay or nay would have been fine.

Well when I see posters debating what peak is for 4 pages , it brings out the sneer in me . Good day your highness.

Originally posted by Don Corleone
Well when I see posters debating what peak is for 4 pages , it brings out the sneer in me . Good day your highness.

you call that a debate? shame on you.

Originally posted by -Pr-
you call that a debate? shame on you.

I say again , good day .

Originally posted by aztec
Hal takes the majority, he's dealt with bricks before. Gladiator isn't anything special.

Originally posted by Rhiaggo
Hal has far more power to play wth, but Glad's physical attributes are just a bt overwhealming in this situation. What it would come down to is Glad's speed vs Hal's norman human reaction, an a speedster will always win in ths case.

hal was one of the only ones to catch zoom. plus he and barry had races together.

"]Hal can teleport and he's not exactly a slow flyer."

"hal was one of the only ones to catch zoom. plus he and barry had races together."

Hal can "fly"fast but Glad can"move"fast which is the difference is also what makes a speedster.

Originally posted by -Pr-
no i didn't.

yeah... completely ignore my entire argument and just say I'm wrong.. Great debating skills there...

Originally posted by bobbi
yeah... completely ignore my entire argument and just say I'm wrong.. Great debating skills there...

i didn't ignore it; i just didn't want to quote a wall of text and go through every minute detail.

i'm sorry if that offends you, but i honestly thought i picked out the central part of your point. if i didn't, then please, enlighten me.

Originally posted by Rhiaggo
Hal has far more power to play wth, but Glad's physical attributes are just a bt overwhealming in this situation. What it would come down to is Glad's speed vs Hal's norman human reaction, an a speedster will always win in ths case.

While there is no doubt that Hal is slower than Gladiator, he's demonstrated the ability to affect beings as fast or faster than Glads. And GLads has had troubles with people much slower than he is, like Thor.

Originally posted by Desaad
While there is no doubt that Hal is slower than Gladiator, he's demonstrated the ability to affect beings as fast or faster than Glads. And GLads has had troubles with people much slower than he is, like Thor.

So are you saying that hal could beat thor because in my eyes, thor would crush hal as well?

Originally posted by -Pr-
i didn't ignore it; i just didn't want to quote a wall of text and go through every minute detail.

i'm sorry if that offends you, but i honestly thought i picked out the central part of your point. if i didn't, then please, enlighten me.

This is a debate forum.. you're suppose to debate. Not just say yes or no. If someone has an argument you provide a counter argument. You don't just disagree... and leave it at that. Otherwise this entire vs forum would be filled with "yes, no yes no yes no" in every thread. I provided an argument supporting my view. The appropriate thing would be for you to provide a counterargument either refuting the points I made or at the least an argument supporting your own points.

You did neither. You just said you disagreed.

Just ignore pr, he's a troll, he'll be banned soon.

Gladiator

Originally posted by Desaad
While there is no doubt that Hal is slower than Gladiator, he's demonstrated the ability to affect beings as fast or faster than Glads. And GLads has had troubles with people much slower than he is, like Thor.

The rings can lock on to speedsters, right?

Originally posted by bobbi
This is a debate forum.. you're suppose to debate. Not just say yes or no. If someone has an argument you provide a counter argument. You don't just disagree... and leave it at that. Otherwise this entire vs forum would be filled with "yes, no yes no yes no" in every thread. I provided an argument supporting my view. The appropriate thing would be for you to provide a counterargument either refuting the points I made or at the least an argument supporting your own points.

You did neither. You just said you disagreed.

i had already made my point in other posts, though, that were relevant to yours. they're throughout this thread.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
The rings can lock on to speedsters, right?

yep.

Originally posted by -Pr-
i had already made my point in other posts, though, that were relevant to yours. they're throughout this thread.

yep.

yeah.. I read your posts...you're not worth talking to anymore. Everything you've said so far is barely even an argument much less an argument against my points. I'll respond to you when you learn what an argument and a debate is. I'm out.

Originally posted by bobbi
yeah.. I read your posts...you're not worth talking to anymore. Everything you've said so far is barely even an argument much less an argument against my points. I'll respond to you when you learn what an argument and a debate is. I'm out.

pr1983

i'm sorry i didn't give you the attention you so obviously deserve.

Aw to hell with it. I don't want no beef, but:

Originally posted by bobbi
I'll respond to you when you learn what an argument and a debate is. I'm out.

👆 Pretty much.

Originally posted by Deadline
Aw to hell with it. I don't want no beef, but:

👆 Pretty much.

shrug

Originally posted by Deadline
Aw to hell with it. I don't want no beef, but:

👆 Pretty much.

Agreed 👆

I respect the fact you're honest, even if it means getting banned.