Originally posted by The MISTER
Is a man gay if he wants a masculine woman to use a huge dildo on him? Is the woman gay because she wants him to wear a dress while she does this? These gay and straight labels are vague and only help to describe some of an individuals preferences.
It's not gay as homsexual-sex is clearly same gender on same gender. It is 'ghey' though, imo.
I did find it hilarious you felt the need to specify "huge" in the dildo. You want to confess something to the board, hmm?
Originally posted by The MISTER
'And that brings it full circle: the repeal of this law will free those homosexuals who have been forced to live a lie to go on in their jobs with a bit more dignity and protection.'I agree 100%
As for being certain where people are going with things I suggest that you wait and see whether you are right or not. I really don't see why all preferences can't be classified as the same. I'm sure that straight and gay are just labels that like all labels leave much to be desired. Is a man gay if he wants a masculine woman to use a huge dildo on him? Is the woman gay because she wants him to wear a dress while she does this? These gay and straight labels are vague and only help to describe some of an individuals preferences.
Oh, I don't need to wait and see where you're going. I only hope that once I point them out, that you'll be forced to come up with new directions to take your spew.
Originally posted by Robtard😆 Don't get mad man I've seen a lot of porn and a straight anal scene can get a s*** dick and when it happens its gross to me (it can ruin an otherwise good scene actually). Sorry cause I forget that lesbian is a term too. To hell with all of this I was really just trying to look at the situation from both sides. Straight guys aren't just homo-hunters looking to commit hate crimes.
WTF? I told you exactly why and how I used the word "gay", I was referring to male-homosexuality(and this was the main point of discusion) as this is common verbiage these days. Gay is typically now used to denote male-homosexuality, ie "gay, lesbian and transgendered."Every aspect of gay(see above) sex is undesirable(not gross) to me, as I don't find men attractive; it's got nothing to do with "shit covered dicks." I don't think about that when I discuss male homosexuality, "shit-dick" isn't something that instantly comes to mind. Just as I said above, "urine" wouldn't be the first thought in my head in a topic concerning lesbian sex. Your mind may work that way, doesn't mean others do.
WTF #2"Squirting" isn't urine, it's female ejaculate, though some amounts of urine coming out is common during vaginal intercourse/play, especially during female orgasm. Just the way the body is made.
Originally posted by The MISTER
😆 Don't get mad man I've seen a lot of porn and a straight anal scene can get a s*** dick and when it happens its gross to me (it can ruin an otherwise good scene actually). Sorry cause I forget that lesbian is a term too.To hell with all of this I was really just trying to look at the situation from both sides. Straight guys aren't just homo-hunters looking to commit hate crimes.
See, I avoid scat-film all together. But that's just me.
Who said they were?
Originally posted by The MISTER
I think straight guys are considered the cavemen of society. Masculinity is associated with being hairy, getting musty, belching, scratching, fighting, hunting...so on and so on.
There are plenty of gays that fit those descriptions.
Jaden10 above for example, he's hairy (just not his head), stinks, burps, farts and is just as likely to kick your ass as he is to f--k it.
Originally posted by skekUngYou don't even know where you're going as you constantly contradict the hell out of yourself. I've already seen it myself. Word games are where you do have skill. You're lawyer level.
Oh, I don't need to wait and see where you're going. I only hope that once I point them out, that you'll be forced to come up with new directions to take your spew.
Originally posted by RobtardGetting back on topic, I'm saying that straight guys have become scapegoats for anti-gay sentiment. The mans man is a gay-basher. That's how things are being portrayed when it's actually majority vs minority which is an ever present part of humans not just straight men. 😮💨
There are plenty of gays that fit those descriptions.Jaden10 above for example, he's hairy (just not his head), stinks, burps, farts and is just as likely to kick your ass as he is to f--k it.
Originally posted by The MISTER
Getting back on topic, I'm saying that straight guys have become scapegoats for anti-gay sentiment. The mans man is a gay-basher. That's how things are being portrayed when it's actually majority vs minority which is an ever present part of humans not just straight men. 😮💨
Considering it's typically straight-males (imo closeted homos) who have a problem with homosexuality and to be on topic it will be mostly straight-male soldiers who will have an issue with openly gay soldiers, it really isn't a "scapegoat", just something that is.
Do you really see a gaggle of gay soldiers bashing a straight soldier because of his sexuality?
Originally posted by The MISTER
Getting back on topic, I'm saying that straight guys have become scapegoats for anti-gay sentiment. The mans man is a gay-basher. That's how things are being portrayed when it's actually majority vs minority which is an ever present part of humans not just straight men. 😮💨
Oh no, those poor straight guys. I feel so bad for them, having things so hard because someone might think they're a bigot! Horrible.
Shut up.
We've already established that the military got along almost completely fine without DADT (there were a few isolated cases of abuse on gay men...and maybe women (I do not know about lesbian hate CRIME in the military, I always hear/read about gay male hate crime)), so this discussion of "but straight people will be offended" is complete bullshit.
The only thing that needs to happen if straight men commit any CRIMES against gay men is a criminal prosecution from the military courts needs to take place. After a few cases get pushed through, we should see the hate stop. It needs to be let known that "gay hate" will not be tolerated. I want to hear Obama make that a military priority to his Joint Chiefs.
Originally posted by Peach
Oh no, those poor straight guys. I feel so bad for them, having things so hard because someone might think they're a bigot! Horrible.Shut up.
😆 😆 😆 😆
crylaugh
Best post in the thread.
Originally posted by Robtard
Considering it's typically straight-males (imo closeted homos) who have a problem with homosexuality and to be on topic it will be mostly straight-male soldiers who will have an issue with openly gay soldiers, it really isn't a "scapegoat", just something that is.Do you really see a gaggle of gay soldiers bashing a straight soldier because of his sexuality?
Now that DADT is history, I doubt we'll see tons of screaming queens flocking to the nearest recruiting station. Openly gay guys who join the service will probably look 'normal' and dress and act in a typically straight way.
I just can't see someone like Richard Simmons firing a machine gun or flying a jet.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Now that DADT is history, I doubt we'll see tons of screaming queens flocking to the nearest recruiting station. Openly gay guys who join the service will probably look 'normal' and dress and act in a typically straight way.I just can't see someone like Richard Simmons firing a machine gun or flying a jet.
Agreed, I've said as much previously; I do think the anti-gay attitude from many do believe that doing away with DADT will result in what you said above. Flocks of Queens now joining up and doing drills to the background music of The Village People; it just isn't so.