Originally posted by Uriel005Uhm, they can and have been beaten in comics.
lol quan still trying to prove that CIS off Wally and Zoom can be beaten. Good luck on stopping someone who via speedsteal can turn your reaction to 0 so then it doesn't matter what skills you have at your disposal you can't react to anything. 😄
Shields are all that is necessary to negate the speed advantage imo.
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterWW and Hal Jordan. I get that you get to ignore how the character is portrayed here and just powerset it up but there were never any examples of anyone even near Surfer level beaten in under a nanosecond.
Who hasn't? Plus the forum (and this matchup) are very different.
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterI tend to like villains only heroes I really like from mk are raiden and sub. scorpion I wouldn't consider a villain or hero.
You like the sorcerer's eh?I like Johnny Cage, Scorpion, Drahmin, and a few others.
I do like sorcerers but also like Shao Kahn, Goro, and Kintaro and let's throw in Onaga go good measure.
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterIt might have deeper gameplay but I go by characters first along with story. I don't see the comparison in terms of what I look for in a game. Always been a diehard mk fan since back when arcades flourished and was practically unbeatable at mk 2.
Street Fighter is better than Mortal Kombat. Perish infidel!
No one on this entire board I bet could even come close to me at part 2.
Originally posted by -Pr-In terms of gameplay definitely.
it's a more fluid, more accomplished game yes, but i honestly think both games have their pros and cons. mortal kombat for me can be just as fun as SF.though no bloody Seth helps too.
I actually don't mind Mortal Kombat a whole ton. Although it can be a bit silly with the quirky gameplay.
Their movies and their soundtrack was the best ever.
Originally posted by quanchi112I like the SF characters and they did a magnificent job with 2v, the deepest I've about seen in game characters. But they have their silliness too. MK was more based on a gimmick though. I prefer the older games to the newer ones.
It might have deeper gameplay but I go by characters first along with story. I don't see the comparison in terms of what I look for in a game. Always been a diehard mk fan since back when arcades flourished and was practically unbeatable at mk 2.No one on this entire board I bet could even come close to me at part 2.