Cross Genre Match #21: Frieza vs Thanos

Originally posted by jinzin
Well.... I wasn't going to take this thread seriously, and I was going to take you even less seriously given your reputation... But I can see now you're looking to pick a fight... well now you've got one. Enjoy:

This was actually what you were responding to with your post. Surfer and the destructive level of his blast as used on Thanos... Your response had nothing to do with the proof of what Carver asked you to supply and was a complete red herring to avoid actually legitimately backing up what you propositioned.

If you're response had anything to do with what Carver actually asked of you, I wouldn't have bothered responding to it in the manner which I did..... it didn't.

So if you want to lecture people about thinking before they post perhaps you should lead by example next time... It's hard enough to keep track of the context of a thread that has over 20 pages posted up in 2 days WITHOUT having to read between the lines to presume what you MEANT or how you meant it.

Not my fault you don't understand what impressive means.

I replied in kind with a feat which resulted in planetary destruction I never stated he had been involved in something that destroyed a planet ten times the size of earth I don't even think the size of the planet was ever given it wasn't earth, sport.

Thanos isn't really this messy and usually just beats down his opponents he doesn't need to destroy huge landmasses to defeat his opponent.

Again, you acted like I gave an example of Thanos' more impressive feats which I didn't. The word impressive doesn't come to mind so you're still wrong despite this rather large unneeded post that came as a result of your pride being hurt.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Everything before freiza turned into final form is void. He healed completely when he came back as shown when he grew his tail back.It wasn't planetary power but it was above continent.In the power range of a low herald.It wasn't a nuke.And when was this kick?And when he became a super sayian freiza got owned after a few minutes.And its only due to freizas biology that he survived as a torso.

They fight in seculded areas so people aren't hurt.Its their energy attacks that destroy cities.Not punching power.Thanos's punching power>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>freizas.I mean thanos killed surfer in 8 punches.

Your entire post FAILS. Answer this question, monarch hit prime with a blast that didn't even level a city and it temporarily knocked him out and he admitted that it hurt him... does that make prime high meta. Think before you talk. Dbz character can control their ki. They can make it concentrated, explosive, planetary, etc... just because a city doesn't explode everytime they shoot something doesn't help your lame ass case. Monarch was easily classified as a skyfather before destroying a universe and his highest power output was destroying a continent.

Gamora kicked thanos in the face and made him bleed, what does that make thanos, low street?

Its their punching power also. Vegeta and goku was destroying mountains with a wave of their hands. Goku and fat buu annihilated a city with nothing but brute strength.

Frieza powerlevel was the reason he survived. If he had a power level of 1000, he would have died and easily at that.

Blackbolt, I have some debating classes from 1-5 est... if you are interested, let me know because some of the things you say are hilarious.

carver you should be the last person to teach the kid how to debate

Originally posted by carver9
Your entire post FAILS. Answer this question, monarch hit prime with a blast that didn't even level a city and it temporarily knocked him out and he admitted that it hurt him... does that make prime high meta. Think before you talk. Dbz character can control their ki. They can make it concentrated, explosive, planetary, etc... just because a city doesn't explode everytime they shoot something doesn't help your lame ass case. Monarch was easily classified as a skyfather before destroying a universe and his highest power output was destroying a continent.

Gamora kicked thanos in the face and made him bleed, what does that make thanos, low street?

Its their punching power also. Vegeta and goku was destroying mountains with a wave of their hands. Goku and fat buu annihilated a city with nothing but brute strength.

Frieza powerlevel was the reason he survived. If he had a power level of 1000, he would have died and easily at that.

Blackbolt, I have some debating classes from 1-5 est... if you are interested, let me know because some of the things you say are hilarious.

And that has absolutely no relevance.

They was this during buu saga with majin vegeta?Yeah them>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Freiza.

No it was because of his biology.

Most of the things you say are hilarious.You can't make a claim without backing it up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
says the guy who came in here and assumed I gave a planetary destroyuing feat as an example of Thanos' more impressive feats.

A reasonable assumption given the fact that you made the reference in response to nothing being discussed.

So if it wasn't proving what Carver asked for, and it wasn't supposed to impress then why bring it up at all?

Should I just assume fron now on that ALL of your posts are ass irrelivent as that one was?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not my fault you don't understand what impressive means.

Don't know what you think this has to do with anything... nice attempt at ad hominem I guess...?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I replied in kind with a feat which resulted in planetary destruction

Which had nothing to do with what Carver asked you for.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never stated he had been involved in something that destroyed a planet ten times the size of earth I don't even think the size of the planet was ever given it wasn't earth, sport.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos isn't really this messy and usually just beats down his opponents he doesn't need to destroy huge landmasses to defeat his opponent.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Again, you acted like I gave an example of Thanos' more impressive feats which I didn't. The word impressive doesn't come to mind so you're still wrong despite this rather large unneeded post that came as a result of your pride being hurt.

Again, if you didn't think it was worth bringing up as a point to impress and it wasn't relivent to what Carver asked for.... then why bring it up at all.....

With as much arrogance as you apparently have, I expected better than this.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos usually hits his opponent and it's very unquantifiable when it hits another character. Surfer can easily destroy Thanos yet he can't even force Thanos into any discomfort at all.

One blast which soloed the Surfer didn't even affect Thanos. That's power coming from Odin yet Thanos took his first blast like a cool breeze.

Do you feel Frieza can tank Odin's blasts ?

Well frieza could one shot heralds as well so using that as a argument isn't helping your case.

What's the biggest planet surfer has destroyed and how easily did he do it?

Champion destroyed a planet and surfer stated that someone with that kind of power could rival his own power... well frieza at his weakest had planetary level power in his index finger.

I don't know friezas cap when it comes to generating power so I can't answe your odin question. What I do know is that 2 peeps that can read power levels stated that frieza power could consume the universe.

I believe thanos is more durable to an extent but I also believe that he could get dropped by someone that is more powerful than him. Frieza got all day and frieza could hit thanos with so many blast in a second that thanos wouldn't even get the chance to muster up a thought.

Originally posted by iceman24567
carver you should be the last person to teach the kid how to debate

Let me handle this. :-)

Originally posted by jinzin
A reasonable assumption given the fact that you made the reference in response to nothing being discussed.

So if it wasn't proving what Carver asked for, and it wasn't supposed to impress then why bring it up at all?

Should I just assume fron now on that ALL of your posts are ass irrelivent as that one was?

Don't know what you think this has to do with anything... nice attempt at ad hominem I guess...?

Which had nothing to do with what Carver asked you for.

More irrelivent nonsense to this particular discussion.

Even MORE irrelivent crapola...

lol... yeah that's what happened. 🙄

Again, if you didn't think it was worth bringing up as a point to impress and it wasn't relivent to what Carver asked for.... then why bring it up at all.....

With as much arrogance as you apparently have, I expected better than this.

He was focused on plantary destruction and nothing else mattered to him so I gave an example of the weakest Thanos ever doing so. I never said impressive I think collateral damage feats are mostly useless anyways in proving power.

carver was talking about planetary destruction aka collateral damage I gave him an example. What don't you understand ?

Irrelevant is spelled like so and it was relevant your post the first one and the ones that followed have all been irrelevant.

At least you spell irrelevant incorrectly each and every time. Kinda showing it isn't a typo and you honestly like using words you can't even spell over and over again.
🙂

It was relevant to what Thanos had been involved in with regards to planetary destruction. Impressive, nah but I guess everytime someone points to a feat you automatically determine they think it's impressive which is absurd.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Yes but you have to prove it was planetary power.You can't just claim every blast that they throw is planetary busting power buts its concentrated.You have to prove it.And theres no way to prove it.

And that has absolutely no relevance.

They was this during buu saga with majin vegeta?Yeah them>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Freiza.

No it was because of his biology.

Most of the things you say are hilarious.You can't make a claim without backing it up.

Master roshi destroyed the moon with a regular kamehameha wave. No way of denying this... happened on panel.

Goku shot frieza with a 20 time kayoken kamehameha wave. The kayoken amps goku abilties per each kaoken 10 times his original power. Let's say he use a standard blast and blow up a planet, then he use the same blast but do it with the kayoken, it would be 10 times more powerful. This blast BLEW up nameks sky and again, its 60 times more powerful than the moon busting kamehameha and frieza TANKED it. The only thing frieza looked at was his hands because he was shocked at what happened. If you want to know about the kayoken, listen to what goku say while battling nappa and vegeta.

Originally posted by carver9
Well frieza could one shot heralds as well so using that as a argument isn't helping your case.

What's the biggest planet surfer has destroyed and how easily did he do it?

Champion destroyed a planet and surfer stated that someone with that kind of power could rival his own power... well frieza at his weakest had planetary level power in his index finger.

I don't know friezas cap when it comes to generating power so I can't answe your odin question. What I do know is that 2 peeps that can read power levels stated that frieza power could consume the universe.

I believe thanos is more durable to an extent but I also believe that he could get dropped by someone that is more powerful than him. Frieza got all day and frieza could hit thanos with so many blast in a second that thanos wouldn't even get the chance to muster up a thought.

I also suspect you're twisting what Frieza is capable of and are lying when you state this guy can oneshot heralds.

Champion didn't rival his own power so what's your point ?

Shields+ forceblock=game over from what I imagine but then again I don't watch dragon ball z and only correct people's false logic I don't know enough about dragon ball z to debate this as I have stated numerous times.

Originally posted by carver9
Let me handle this. :-)

Originally posted by quanchi112
It wasn't reasonable at all since I never implied or stated impressive.

He was focused on plantary destruction and nothing else mattered to him so I gave an example of the weakest Thanos ever doing so. I never said impressive I think collateral damage feats are mostly useless anyways in proving power.

carver was talking about planetary destruction aka collateral damage I gave him an example. What don't you understand ?

Irrelevant is spelled like so and it was relevant your post the first one and the ones that followed have all been irrelevant.

At least you spell irrelevant incorrectly each and every time. Kinda showing it isn't a typo and you honestly like using words you can't even spell over and over again.
🙂

It was relevant to what Thanos had been involved in with regards to planetary destruction. Impressive, nah but I guess everytime someone points to a feat you automatically determine they think it's impressive which is absurd.

You used surfer as evidence and I wanted to know how powerful surfer blast was.

Originally posted by iceman24567
Ok you old fart 😬

Lol... that's messed up.

Originally posted by carver9
You used surfer as evidence and I wanted to know how powerful surfer blast was.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol... that's messed up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It wasn't reasonable at all since I never implied or stated impressive.

He was focused on plantary destruction and nothing else mattered to him so I gave an example of the weakest Thanos ever doing so. I never said impressive I think collateral damage feats are mostly useless anyways in proving power.

carver was talking about planetary destruction aka collateral damage I gave him an example. What don't you understand ?

Irrelevant is spelled like so and it was relevant your post the first one and the ones that followed have all been irrelevant.

At least you spell irrelevant incorrectly each and every time. Kinda showing it isn't a typo and you honestly like using words you can't even spell over and over again.
🙂

It was relevant to what Thanos had been involved in with regards to planetary destruction. Impressive, nah but I guess everytime someone points to a feat you automatically determine they think it's impressive which is absurd.

😂 If the most you can do is criticize my spelling errors, I'm going to have to assume you have nothing else of merit to say, but given the string of your posts on the subject, that isn't at all surprising.

So once again, you admit to posting "irrelevant" (that better for you?) material... Cool, I'll take your concession on the matter.

Originally posted by Starscream M
how old are you?

Originally posted by carver9
Master roshi destroyed the moon with a regular kamehameha wave. No way of denying this... happened on panel.

Goku shot frieza with a 20 time kayoken kamehameha wave. The kayoken amps goku abilties per each kaoken 10 times his original power. Let's say he use a standard blast and blow up a planet, then he use the same blast but do it with the kayoken, it would be 10 times more powerful. This blast BLEW up nameks sky and again, its 60 times more powerful than the moon busting kamehameha and frieza TANKED it. The only thing frieza looked at was his hands because he was shocked at what happened. If you want to know about the kayoken, listen to what goku say while battling nappa and vegeta.

And i'm not doubting that.It probably would have been enough power to easily bust a city.Easily.But probably not a continent. Its not a matter of do they have it. Its a matter of do they use it all the time. The answer is no.

Originally posted by jinzin
Is that supposed to be impressive? 😕

Frieza obliterated a planet completely inhabited by planetary threats with his finger tip using less than .025 percent of his full power. 😐

You mean 2 percent?

Jinzin and Quan, the match of the millenia?