Cross Genre Match #21: Frieza vs Thanos

Originally posted by quanchi112
You can't prove this as Surfer wasn't trying to wreck a planet he was focusing his blast on Thanos. It therefore stands to reason a concentrated blast with regards to one person is more powerful logically than a blast that destroys a planet spread further out and less powerful. I told you to think before you posted and you still have done no such thing.

No, I didn't I gave an example of Thanos being involved in a battle that destroyed a planet and he won at his weakest. You then came in chirping about me being impressed which was incorrect.

No, as you can plainly see I did more than criticize your spelling errors I just pointed out you don't know how to spell words you use. That's embarrassing.

No, it was relevant as to planet destroying power which Thanos at his weakest won in spite of the planet being destroyed. It was relevant whereas you are irrelevant.

"you are irrelevant" 😆

Again, for someone who wants to point out spelling errors as a pillar of their argument... Utterly childish...

Look you threw up a complete red herring apart from what Carver asked for, it's that simple. He even seconded the notion... and now you're beating a dead horse into the ground pretending your post had some relivancy.... It didn't. Get over it and get over yourself.

Originally posted by jinzin
"you are irrelevant" 😆

Again, for someone who wants to point out spelling errors as a pillar of their argument... Utterly childish...

Look you threw up a complete red herring apart from what Carver asked for, it's that simple. He even seconded the notion... and now you're beating a dead horse into the ground pretending your post had some relivancy.... It didn't. Get over it and get over yourself.

That was't the pillar of my argument you conceded in the next post when i told you it wasn't impressive and then came back when I ripped the pride out of you.

It's relevancy by the way. No, I provided an example of planet destroying power at Thanos' weakest form which did next to nothing to him.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Yet Cell isn't freiza.And Cell was known to lie.

Yes he can destroy a planet with that. But being able to destroy 1 planet with 1% does not equate to being able to destroy 100 planets with 100% or even a planet 100x earths size.

Yes.But it obviously isn't 1%.Would I guess he had more power in 1st form?Yes.Would I guess it was a [b]lot more?No. [/B]

I would disagree. I would expect that the percentage rule would dictate exactly that.

Frieza blew up a planet using less than half of one percent of his power... It would be illogical to think that 2 percent wouldn't do twice the damage.

Going even further, Vegeta was something approximate to 30 times weaker than first form Frieza and was capable of blowing up a planet.

Again when you power stack it really makes the DB character's power levels pretty daunting.

My reference to the solar system statement was something to do with what King Kold said. I've seen it in at least one translation right before Trunks offed him, guess it wasn't in others though. 😬

Another pain in the ass, DBZ's had about a dozen different translations... even official translations have been different a couple of times...

BTW:
Thanks for being reasonable enough to talk to without getting defensive or offensive about it... makes this whole thing a lot easier to dicuss.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Yet Cell isn't freiza.And Cell was known to lie.

Yes he can destroy a planet with that. But being able to destroy 1 planet with 1% does not equate to being able to destroy 100 planets with 100% or even a planet 100x earths size.

Yes.But it obviously isn't 1%.Would I guess he had more power in 1st form?Yes.Would I guess it was a [b]lot more?No.

😂. Yes they are hard to argue over.As to debate with them properly ABC logic is needed and you don't use that for comic books.

Exactly. [/B]

You are wrong yet again, his 1% final transformation power level was 25 million... his first form only had a powerlevel of 530000.

Prove that frieza used a large portion of his power to destroy planet vegeta because what I seen, he was laughing.

What did cell lie about that had anything to do with his power?

Originally posted by Black bolt z

Yes he can destroy a planet with that. But being able to destroy 1 planet with 1% does not equate to being able to destroy 100 planets with 100% or even a planet 100x earths size.

You're saying that destroying planets with little effort doesn't mean being able to defeat Thanos.

So what measure are you looking for?

Originally posted by quanchi112
At least I taught you how to spell irrelevant whereas you taught me nothing.

That was't the pillar of my argument you conceded in the next post when i told you it wasn't impressive and then came back when I ripped the pride out of you.

It's relevancy by the way. No, I provided an example o fplanet destroying power at Thanos' weakest form which did next to nothing to him.

Hard to teach someone as thick headed as you. 😬
You want to continue to pretend that your post had anything to do with what Carver asked you... well you can, but everyone here knows it's a lie. Carver even pointed it out to you and here you are insisting otherwise.

"o fplanet" destroying power huh? 🙄

Originally posted by Starscream M
I find your logic a little hard to follow.

You're saying that destroying planets with little effort doesn't mean being able to defeat Thanos.

So what measure are you looking for?

I don't know what he is thinking would drop thanos but whatever it is, he is wrong.

Originally posted by jinzin
Hard to teach someone as thick headed as you. 😬
You want to continue to pretend that your post had anything to do with what Carver asked you... well you can, but everyone here knows it's a lie. Carver even pointed it out to you and here you are insisting otherwise.

"o fplanet" destroying power huh? 🙄

My post did have to do with planetary destruction since carver stated surfer never used or blew up a planet when he faced Thanos I used an example of a character who has against a weaker Thanos.

It's already been edited and was a simple typo not me misspelling a word over and over again like you did. See you still don't realize the difference. Let it go.

You acknowledged you were sorry for assuming I implied this feat as impressive. I accepted your apology.

I have a question... when supreme ki told goku and vegeta that kid buu destroyed a galaxy and vegeta then say that he can't wait to fight buu, his power reminds him of frieza. What does that say for you all? Then supreme ki tells vegeta that buu is thousands of times more powerful than frieza.

I wonder what thoughts are popping up in your head with these words.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's easy to teach someone like yourself who needs aid in simple spelling.

My post did have to do with planetary destruction since carver stated surfer never used or blew up a planet when he faced Thanos I used an example of a character who has against a weaker Thanos.

It's already been edited and was a simple typo not me misspelling a word over and over again like you did. See you still don't realize the difference. Let it go.

You acknowledged you were sorry for assuming I implied this feat as impressive. I accepted your apology.

How powerful was surfers blast?

Originally posted by carver9
How powerful was surfers blast?

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's easy to teach someone like yourself who needs aid in simple spelling.

My post did have to do with planetary destruction since carver stated surfer never used or blew up a planet when he faced Thanos I used an example of a character who has against a weaker Thanos.

It's already been edited and was a simple typo not me misspelling a word over and over again like you did. See you still don't realize the difference. Let it go.

You acknowledged you were sorry for assuming I implied this feat as impressive. I accepted your apology.

😂

Again, you hang onto this whole spelling issue like grim death or something.

I never claimed to be the best speller in the world, or have the best grammar. I don't have spell check and I'm typically too lazy to edit or review my own posts after I type them up.
This isn't an English lit. class, it's a forum for God sakes.

And, you grasping onto this spelling issue isn't you making a strong argument for yourself, it IS however, ANOTHER example of you throwing out a red herring in order to avoid the subject matter being discussed.
Maybe you think my spelling errors somehow detract from how effective or accurate my actual points really are... but as someone else once said, you're not fooling anyone who isn't drinking paint thinner.

I apologized because I was giving you the benefit of the doubt in SPITE of what you wrote or what you were responding to when you wrote it... And then... you engaged in some super-dickery... pretty plain and simple.

Originally posted by jinzin
😂

Again, you hang onto this whole spelling issue like grim death or something.

I never claimed to be the best speller in the world, or have the best grammar. I don't have spell check and I'm typically too lazy to edit or review my own posts after I type them up.
This isn't an English lit. class, it's a forum for God sakes.

And, you grasping onto this spelling issue isn't you making a strong argument for yourself, it IS however, ANOTHER example of you throwing out a red herring in order to avoid the subject matter being discussed.
Maybe you think my spelling errors somehow detract from how effective or accurate my actual points really are... but as someone else once said, you're not fooling anyone who isn't drinking paint thinner.

I apologized because I was giving you the benefit of the doubt in SPITE of what you wrote or what you were responding to when you wrote it... And then... you engaged in some super-dickery... pretty plain and simple.

I never stated it was but to continue to misspell simple words like relevant makes you look bad I can see a typo but lack of spelling really denotes lack of intelligence more often than not. It also coupled with you accusing me of acting like this feat was impressive also shows a comprehension problem to boot.

You apologized to me. End of story and I forgave your ignorance on this matter just drop it and walk away. It wasn't impressive when it comes to Thanos now someone else, sure but not Thanos this is very low on his totem pole.

Originally posted by jinzin
I would disagree. I would expect that the percentage rule would dictate exactly that.

Frieza blew up a planet using less than half of one percent of his power... It would be illogical to think that 2 percent wouldn't do twice the damage.

Going even further, Vegeta was something approximate to 30 times weaker than first form Frieza and was capable of blowing up a planet.

Again when you power stack it really makes the DB character's power levels pretty daunting.

My reference to the solar system statement was something to do with what King Kold said. I've seen it in at least one translation right before Trunks offed him, guess it wasn't in others though. 😬

Another pain in the ass, DBZ's had about a dozen different translations... even official translations have been different a couple of times...

BTW:
Thanks for being reasonable enough to talk to without getting defensive or offensive about it... makes this whole thing a lot easier to dicuss.

Not nessicarily.Thats not how power works.

Yes. But that doesn't mean that first form freiza can blow up 30 planets.

King kai said it? If king kai said he could destroy one King kai isn't known to lie.

Exactly.

Yes.Agree to disagee.

Originally posted by carver9
You are wrong yet again, his 1% final transformation power level was 25 million... his first form only had a powerlevel of 530000.

Prove that frieza used a large portion of his power to destroy planet vegeta because what I seen, he was laughing.

What did cell lie about that had anything to do with his power?

Just because he was laughing doesn't mean he was using only 1%

Destroying a solar system?

Originally posted by Starscream M
I find your logic a little hard to follow.

You're saying that destroying planets with little effort doesn't mean being able to defeat Thanos.

So what measure are you looking for?

And Quan just gonna say...Loghain does rule.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't hol donto anything you continue to misspell words showing me spelling is rather difficult for you.

I never stated it was but to continue to misspell simple words like relevant makes you look bad I can see a typo but lack of spelling really denotes lack of intelligence more often than not. It also coupled with you accusing me of acting like this feat was impressive also shows a comprehension problem to boot.

You apologized to me. End of story and I forgave your ignorance on this matter just drop it and walk away. It wasn't impressive when it comes to Thanos now someone else, sure but not Thanos this is very low on his totem pole.

Uh, yeah you are.. as you continue to do so here.

The automatic assumption that the incorrecct spelling of a couple of words is somehow linked directly to intelligence is about as ignorant as you can get.

My comprehension is just fine. Seems like you're the one who needs some work there if you think that an example of Thanos vs. Drax is somehow ALSO an example of the destructive force used by Surfer in a single instance... It isn't.

corrected- "End of story; and I forgave your ignorance on this matter, just drop it and walk away. It wasn't impressive when it comes to Thanos. Now someone else, sure, but not Thanos. This is very low on his totem pole.".....

maybe my spelling isn't so great, but your grammar is equally atrocious. Should I then assume you're intelligence is ALSO lacking? By your own standards I suppose so. 😬

Originally posted by Black bolt z

Something greater than that.Planet destroying power is shown not to be able to beat thanos.

Originally posted by jinzin
Uh, yeah you are.. as you continue to do so here.

The automatic assumption that the incorrecct spelling of a couple of words is somehow linked directly to intelligence is about as ignorant as you can get.

My comprehension is just fine. Seems like you're the one who needs some work there if you think that an example of Thanos vs. Drax is somehow ALSO an example of the destructive force used by Surfer in a single instance... It isn't.

corrected- "End of story; and I forgave your ignorance on this matter, just drop it and walk away. It wasn't impressive when it comes to Thanos. Now someone else, sure, but not Thanos. This is very low on his totem pole.".....

maybe my spelling isn't so great, but your grammar is equally atrocious. Should I then assume you're intelligence is ALSO lacking? By your own standards I suppose so. 😬

That alone was the second sign not just the only one. The first is when you came in and automatically assumed I thought the planet destroying feat was impressive. Maybe for a Gladiator character this is Thanos, Logan.

I've given examples of Surfer's power he's destroyed a planet while fighting Morg this isn't impressive for him either. Hell, Terrax has even destroyed a planet on panel. Means nothing.

It seems like you are a hypocrite since it was a spelling error and not punctuation. I won't be graded and unlike you know what I am doing when forming complete sentences, logan.

Originally posted by Starscream M
and haven't jinzin and carver already explained that frieza's power IS greater than planet destroying?

And he was taking lots of power from Odin. Thanos durability is great.

Originally posted by Starscream M
and haven't jinzin and carver already explained that frieza's power IS greater than planet destroying?

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Yes. But you can't quantify how much. I mean drax can tear out the core of a star but until he started glowing green he could never beat or even contend with thanos.

also, drax is strong, but he is not really herald strong...more like base hulk. He only beat thanos due to his unique power.

and you're right, thanos durability is pretty high. But just because he took hits from Odin, doesn't mean all of those hits were planet-busting level.