Originally posted by Nephthys
No-limits fallacy. Unless the shield has on-screen proof that it can repel something with the force that Superman can muster up, it will be as the wind to him. A mere annoyance.Unless you can prove that it can repel all physical attacks possible ever, even Supermans continent supporting punches moving at lightspeed, then I suggest you stop with these silly fallacies.
There is also the "no-limits fallacy" in reverse. It is the fallacy that assumes that there has to be a limit when no limit was imposed. It is the failed tool of those that are backed into a corner: you have no way around it so you pretend that it fits a fallacy when your very use of the no-limits fallacy argument also fits a different version of that same arguemnt: the limits fallacy.
This in no way addresses what I stated and inf act, ignores it.
The burden of proof is on you.You literally cannot prove you thesis and the only evidence we have it is that it keeps out all physical and magical attacks while also nulling electronics.
The only way around it is using magic on it. (Proven in Deathly Hollows.)
You cannot pretend that there is a limit when none exists. If one exists, you must prove it. Since no physical limit exists (all physical and most magical was the stipulation), you are simply wrong.
You can pretend a no limits fallacy applies, but it doesn't simply because you have no way of proving your perspective and my point was proven before the thread started.
I will not address this point anymore as it was silly from the beginning.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Superman with a single punch would level the building and kill ever person inside. Yours is a faulty analogy because you cannot do that. Its like saying, Sue Storm is invisible, so I have no chance of beating her with this nuke at all. Clearly false.
If that were my point, you may actually have a point. Since that was not my point and it illustrates you missed it, I'll restate it:
That changes nothing at all: I know where London is but if it were invisible and I needed to attack specific people, I would not be able to do jack shit about it: especially if those three people were protected by layers of shields that specifically prevented me from detecting, physically approaching them, or seeing them.
In your faulty Sue Storm analogy, you would have to have re-worded it as follows:
"Its like saying, Sue Storm is invisible to any senses (which includes ALL of human technology) except those that are magic, cannot be harmed by any physical means, can only harm her with specific and very powerful shield nulling magic, and I obviously have no chance of beating her with this nuke at all. Clearly true."
Thanks for playing.
Let's not try that again. It's rather annoying when I have to explain something that I know you understood but chose to ignore.
Originally posted by Nephthys
When was it mentioned? I recall no scene. Find a youtube link or drop the point if you may.And please, your flattery is so hamhanded.
Nope. I definitely will not do so.
I am dead serious.
You watch all 6 movies and YOU tell ME. This would solve lots of your problems with HP.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Well naturally. I forgot that you were our Lord and Saviour there for a second.
It is about time you recognize.
Originally posted by Nephthys
NO. LIMITS. FALLACY. LOOK IT UP. SERIOUSLY.
Sorry, son, I knew wht a no-limits fallacy was before you could read.
Try again. It was not stated any other way: what ever endeavor you undertake, you will succeed at.
If you endeavor to avoid getting killed by a giant meteor, something will happen that makes that successful: meteor spontaneously explodes, another meteor hits it, and so forth.
No matter what, it is the "god" potion with unbreakable luck.