Originally posted by mardook
The movie was disappointing and probably more disappointing than any Alien related film because it is Ridley's film.
Was better than Alien 3, Alien resurrection and the AvP films, it wasn't as good as Alien or especially Aliens but it was still pretty damn good and I'll be buying the blu-ray for sure 🙂
Originally posted by steverules_2He didn't say it was the worst just the most disappointing there is a difference.
Was better than Alien 3, Alien resurrection and the AvP films, it wasn't as good as Alien or especially Aliens but it was still pretty damn good and I'll be buying the blu-ray for sure 🙂
And I can agree with that statement.
Originally posted by mardook
How childish, if you disagree with Stealth Moose's opinion on something, you're a troll.
It still doesn't make the movie any less disappointing Mr. Stealth Moose.
It wasn't your opinion I objected to so much as how you presented yourself. You certainly appeared to be trolling. Maybe try being more eloquent or elaborate if you wish to be taken seriously.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
While I'm at it, I'll mention this: It is almost at $300 Million worldwide. I've been watching the box office gross like a hawk.
Speaking of box office grosses, where's John Carter at?
Originally posted by Newjak
He didn't say it was the worst just the most disappointing there is a difference.And I can agree with that statement.
Well I know that, but how am I meant to answer his quote? 'It was less dissapointing than...?' If someone says to me they were dissapointed by something I'd answer by saying 'it was better than...' or agreeing with them