Annihilus could certainly drain Thor and that is exactly what he would try and do as that is in character for him. He's already punked Thor with ease in the past amd W/QB he's even more powerful. To me this fight comes down to whether Thor could resist the draining by putting Anni on the defensive or just actively resisiting it. I'm not sure the answer... but I believe he could drain Thor, but Thor could also mount a good offensive attack before Anni had time drain him enough.
thor wins. quasar battled thor in the past and didn't drain him in anyway at all. the q-bands are suspect at best against magic, and no way in hell is there any evidence to suggest that annihilus can battle someone at the level of a skyfather. we've even seen quasar drain a star's worth of energy from ss and it not affect him in the least. OF>>>>>>than ss's power.
rulk is ridiculous and bran's right, GM did reform. guess he takes thanos out as well.
Originally posted by Sr J-BiebWhat comic ?
He reformed against Galactus. That's the whole reason Galactus went into a mini coma.
Originally posted by leonidasThanos never didn't reform whereas Gm failed to. Thanos was reborn atom by atom and vested in an indestructible form. Big diff, there.
thor wins. quasar battled thor in the past and didn't drain him in anyway at all. the q-bands are suspect at best against magic, and no way in hell is there any evidence to suggest that annihilus can battle someone at the level of a skyfather. we've even seen quasar drain a star's worth of energy from ss and it not affect him in the least. OF>>>>>>than ss's power.rulk is ridiculous and bran's right, GM did reform. guess he takes thanos out as well.
Originally posted by Black bolt zBeing rejected by death is good but not only that Thanos is given an indestructible form unlike Gm and we saw him get killed.
Please read those comics.Yet he is rejected by death. So is thanos. Both should be unkillable. So either admit loebforce rulk is PIS or admit rulk could also kill thanos for good.
My point stands yours doesn't more picking and choosing which you seem probe on doing.
Originally posted by quanchi112Both are unkillable. And its obviously not an indestructable form because it was destroyed by anti matter. Both are rejected by death.
Being rejected by death is good but not only that Thanos is given an indestructible form unlike Gm and we saw him get killed.My point stands yours doesn't more picking and choosing which you seem probe on doing.
Picking and choosing what? Killing an unkillable being. Either admit its PIS or admit he can kill thanos as well. Because both are rejected by death. So if one can die so can the other.
Originally posted by dmillsYup Rulk is the worst harcter to bring into a debate.
Yet another moronic aspect of the Rulk/Thor fight. Rulk pwns him the first time, which is later attributed to energy drain, but then Thor comes back and owns the Rulk. WTF happened to energy drain in rnd 2?
He WTF pawned : Odinpower Thor, Hulk, grand master, SS,
He gets stomp by Odinpower Thor, Hulk, barley gets a win over wolverine, Lets not forget the b-list females that gave him hell , red she hulk
All during Loeb's reigh of terror
Originally posted by Black bolt zHis form was which reformed so yes he is unkillable whereas Rulk killed Gm. You have nothing.
Both are unkillable. And its obviously not an indestructable form because it was destroyed by anti matter. Both are rejected by death.Picking and choosing what? Killing an unkillable being. Either admit its PIS or admit he can kill thanos as well. Because both are rejected by death. So if one can die so can the other.