Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
@vince-slicePlease point out the post where I supposedly said that Cyborg Superman's tech was better than Thanos's; I garantee would wont find it, because I never said that...
Zopzop asked me if I thought Henshaws tech was better than Thanos's and I said that question was meaningless...
As pertains my alledged "No Limits Fallacy," there is no fallacy on my part at all; unless some given tech is sentient (self aware; and thus capable of resisting control) OR has built in defenses against technopaths, then there is no [b]logical
reason why a given technopath cant dominate any tech he/she/it encounters...And yes, that control would extend to Galactus's tech (which has been dominated by a technopath on panel; Depowered Tyrant did it) and Celestial tech; although I am betting that if this became an issue, I am certain that a given writter would write Celestial tech as possessing built-in immunity to control attempts (at this point in time though, there is nothing on panel to suggest that Celestial tech is immune to outsider control attempts either)...
So far there is NOTHING on panel to suggest that Thanos's tech is sentient or has built in resistance to technopaths...so at this point in time...there is no reason to support the belief that Thanos's tech would be immune to Henshaw's influence. [/B]
Actually its a classic example of a no limits fallacy. You need to look it up because it's pretty common in debates
You said Henshaw is a Technopath and therefore he dominates all tech including Thanos, and that there's no proof otherwise that he couldn't dominate Thanos' tech.
The same line of flawed logic can be applied to Galactus tech and Celestial tech, or tech even greater than these two combined and we can just keep moving up the ladder, simply because you say there's no proof otherwise of a limit.
For example--hypothetically--a race of beings that are nigh-omnipotent due to their tech and can easily destroy multi-verses with. But they've only appeared on panel once. Whats stopping you from using the same fallacy and asserting that there's no proof their tech can resist Henshaw, and therefore Henshaw and take it over--and beat them in a fight with it?
Saying that there's no limit to Henshaw's technopathy because there's no proof of it is a no limits fallacy.
@vince-slice
Until that mythical race of yours has its tech written as being self aware or having built-in resistance/immunity to technopaths, give me 1 logical reason why it shouldnt be vulnerable to domination?
It supposed to be immune to domination "just because" it was built by beings with super science? LoL.
Galactus's tech was built by Galactus himself...one of the most powerful and essential beings in the universe...and look what happened to his tech when he came across a technopath; dominated!! Thats what happened and it happened on panel...so its beyond dispute.
So again, any tech that is not written as sentient or having built-in resistance/immunity to technopaths is vulnerable to it...there is no logical reason for it not be.
"Just because" a given piece of tech was built by a given being and/or race of beings does NOT automatically make that tech immune to being controlled.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
@vince-sliceUntil that mythical race of yours has its tech [b]written
as being self aware or having built-in resistance/immunity to technopaths, give me 1 logical reason why it shouldnt be vulnerable to domination?It supposed to be immune to domination "just because" it was built by beings with super science? LoL.
Galactus's tech was built by Galactus himself...one of the most powerful and essential beings in the universe...and look what happened to his tech when he came across a technopath; dominated!! Thats what happened and it happened on panel...so its beyond dispute.
So again, any tech that is not written as sentient or having built-in resistance/immunity to technopaths is vulnerable to it...there is no logical reason for it not be.
"Just because" a given piece of tech was built my a given being being and/or race of beings does NOT automatically make that tech immune to being controlled. [/B]
Again, perfect example of a no limits fallacy.
One of the main characteristics of a no limits fallacy is that it can be extrapolated to infinity--this is exactly whats being done here with Henshaw's technopathy. If you can't realize that, then that's too bad.
Originally posted by Mindset
It could be beyond his scope of understanding.
Ah, the troll returns...
He doesnt have to understand its complexities to give it an order...
Cyborg Superman: (points at a man standing on the street corner) "Super Tech, kill that guy over there!"
Super Tech: (fires a green ray at the man on the corner; ray sets him on fire)
Man on the corner: Arggghhhh!!!!!! (falls to the ground dead)
Super Tech: "It is done master." (bows)
Cyborg Superman: (smiles)
💃
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderI was joking with you before, you were either too dense or too big of a baby to see it. I'm guessing both.
Ah, the troll returns...He doesnt have to understand its complexities to give it an order...
Cyborg Superman: (points at a man standing on the street corner) "Super Tech, kill that guy over there!"
Super Tech: (fires a green ray at the man on the corner; ray sets him on fire)
Man on the corner: Arggghhhh!!!!!! (falls to the ground dead)
Super Tech: "It is done master." (bows)
Cyborg Superman: (smiles)
💃
In any case.
Ignoring CS, any technopath would not be able to order any piece of tech to perform an action just by virture of them being a technopath. A technopath could not, with certainty, use the ultimate nullifier proficiently, for example.