Originally posted by Black bolt z
Yes. I figure adding gladitor DNA would make the thanos clone stronger. That does not at all mean it was all galditor's strength that made him 4x stronger then thanos.
So you have something stating that it was more than just gladiator strength that made this clone more powerful?
Originally posted by -Pr-First 5 secs
What do you mean?
Originally posted by carver9Probably the fact that it was a clone of thanos(still trying to get my hands on all issues of Abyss so i don't know if it was an exact clone or not before the galds DNA).
So you have something stating that it was more than just gladiator strength that made this clone more powerful?
Originally posted by -Pr-
If your posting habits don't change, things aren't honestly going to change either.
Pr, its not my post habit, people HATE when I bring up on panel statements that helps my argument. That tends to be everyones problem. When I bring up something that has happened on panel... people get riled up and I kind of understand but I ALWAYS side with on panel proof and I don't see anything wrong with that.
Originally posted by carver9
Pr, its not my post habit, people HATE when I bring up on panel statements that helps my argument. That tends to be everyones problem. When I bring up something that has happened on panel... people get riled up and I kind of understand but I ALWAYS side with on panel proof and I don't see anything wrong with that.
but you don't. you either ignore on panel statements, or you twist them to your own ends just to get one over on character's you don't like. yes, a lot of people do that too, but you go far further than most people, and it's really becoming a problem.
there's interpretation and there's sticking your fingers in your ears and going "la la la la la".
Originally posted by -Pr-
but you don't. you either ignore on panel statements, or you twist them to your own ends just to get one over on character's you don't like. yes, a lot of people do that too, but you go far further than most people, and it's really becoming a problem.there's interpretation and there's sticking your fingers in your ears and going "la la la la la".
Lol... so you are saying that I am stubborn?
Pr, majority of our arguments is about things that I brought up that happened on panel and you saying that the things that I brought up (that happened on panel), saying that I am lowballing.
I disagree with me not accepting things because I have admitted on numerous of occasions that you were right. I don't have a problem with being wrong pr. I even admitted not to long ago that rage was right when we were debating. I also admitted that KM was right during a debate.
Sometimes, you all arguments isn't in a debating tactic, some peeps just get angry when their favorite character is called out.
Originally posted by carver9Carver, are you arguing with a mod?
Lol... so you are saying that I am stubborn?Pr, majority of our arguments is about things that I brought up that happened on panel and you saying that the things that I brought up (that happened on panel), saying that I am lowballing.
I disagree with me not accepting things because I have admitted on numerous of occasions that you were right. I don't have a problem with being wrong pr. I even admitted not to long ago that rage was right when we were debating. I also admitted that KM was right during a debate.
Sometimes, you all arguments isn't in a debating tactic, some peeps just get angry when their favorite character is called out.
Originally posted by Badabing
Carver, are you arguing with a mod?
Nope, that would be the last thing that I would do, especially against PR. I just wanted to know his thoughts about certain things. I hope he didn't take it as me arguing with him because I wasn't. I'm just going to get off for a bit. T2UL.
Originally posted by carver9Now you're arguing with me?! Thin ice...biscuits
Nope, that would be the last thing that I would do, especially against PR. I just wanted to know his thoughts about certain things. I hope he didn't take it as me arguing with him because I wasn't. I'm just going to get off for a bit. T2UL.
Originally posted by carver9
Lol... so you are saying that I am stubborn?Pr, majority of our arguments is about things that I brought up that happened on panel and you saying that the things that I brought up (that happened on panel), saying that I am lowballing.
I disagree with me not accepting things because I have admitted on numerous of occasions that you were right. I don't have a problem with being wrong pr. I even admitted not to long ago that rage was right when we were debating. I also admitted that KM was right during a debate.
Sometimes, you all arguments isn't in a debating tactic, some peeps just get angry when their favorite character is called out.
no. it's nothing to do with people's characters. It's your blatant lying about what happens on panel, and trying to insult me by making weak excuses won't be tolerated. I give you enough leeway on this forum when i could have banned you years ago, so seriously: Don't push it.
Now:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I just sat and read Infinity Abyss from start to finish. Several points I'd like to make:
1) The clones were designed to beat rather than actually match their opponents, so Omega being arguably twice as powerful as Galactus would serve to indicate that Warrior was designed to kill Gladiator, and as such would be superior (if Thanos is to be believed).
2) Not once is the word "stronger" used when describing Warrior's strength/power level.
3) Second hand statements about a character's power are NOT PROOF, NOR CONCRETE EVIDENCE unless backed up by other sources.
4) Trying to retroactively attribute Warrior's power levels as indicating that Gladiator is "four times stronger" than Thanos without any sufficient proof otherwise will be taken as TROLLING, and will result in warnings.
Originally posted by -Pr-
no. it's nothing to do with people's characters. It's your blatant lying about what happens on panel, and trying to insult me by making weak excuses won't be tolerated. I give you enough leeway on this forum when i could have banned you years ago, so seriously: Don't push it.Now:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I just sat and read Infinity Abyss from start to finish. Several points I'd like to make:
1) The clones were designed to beat rather than actually match their opponents, so Omega being arguably twice as powerful as Galactus would serve to indicate that Warrior was designed to kill Gladiator, and as such would be superior (if Thanos is to be believed).
2) Not once is the word "stronger" used when describing Warrior's strength/power level.
3) Second hand statements about a character's power are NOT PROOF, NOR CONCRETE EVIDENCE unless backed up by other sources.
4) Trying to retroactively attribute Warrior's power levels as indicating that Gladiator is "four times stronger" than Thanos without any sufficient proof otherwise will be taken as TROLLING, and will result in warnings.
Well nihilist, pr cleared it up for us... thanks for the help Pr.
I will not bring it up as evidence again.