batman v logan sword fight--no healing

Started by Dum Dum Dugan20 pages

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
😆 dum dum
ALL this shyt you copied and still no video of a Lion vs a Tiger in which a lion was killed 😬

siberian tigers on average are bigger than lions but lions have reach weight of tigers 😬

the lions manes is a deal breaker pure and simple

the tiger can be slightly faster slightly whatever they not overwhelming a lion physically like you're believing

tiger goes for the lions neck... gets mouth full of fur gets neck bitten dies 😬
what are you not getting?

you fabricating some kind of super tiger 😆
that doesn't get confused by think coats of fur


I dont need a video of it, I have documented evidence which is more then I can say of you.

siberian tigers are much larger then lions. Yes there have been zoo lions that have reach close to there weight, but they were fat not in shape wild animals. Wild saberian tiger is significantly heavier then any wild lion.

but it not and I post statement stating it not. You can pretending it is, just make you look stupid.

They faster stronger, and bigger, this is a fact.

tiger rountinely bite through fur, muscles and bones with ease, but a manes going to stop them 🙄. do you even read before you post? por jsut make shit up as you go?

not fabricating anything. notice how I provide evidences, while you prove nothing? Please get back to me when you stop being a pussy and verse me in a battle zone. I know it and you know it that I would destroy you. Your scared, but it ok, just go run off like the puss you are.

ok hammer, here you go. experts determine that a lion would win. also the mane is the main reason (haha, get it, mane...main)

YouTube video [/B]

you can just skip to the last minute

Originally posted by Mindset
Nm

YouTube video

fixed

Originally posted by Starscream M
I educated you on the male lion's prowess. you got all your nonsense info about male lions from captivity crap.

not at all. You educated me on nothing. all you did was waste my time. My info I been posting comes from experts, and countless books. Yours comes from nonsense you make up in your head.

All you did was post a video I have aready seen which showed a lion killing a heyna which is something a friggin leapard could do........

ok mindset, good clip...I guess I believed incorrectly that lions had a stronger bite

Originally posted by inimalist
actually, now that i think about it, you are totally right

those bastards are a nuisance at dumps in Northern ontario/rest of canada, lol

In highschool my bus used to drive past bears on the way to and from the dump all the time. lol

Canadian man with knife > bear. Canadians are the fiercest predator in the animal kingdom! 😱

http://outdoornewsdaily.com/index.php/archives/546

Originally posted by Starscream M
ok hammer, here you go. experts determine that a lion would win. also the mane is the main reason (haha, get it, mane...main)

YouTube video

you can just skip to the last minute [/B]


Actaully they don't. The only expert on there was Dave. He is an expert of all big cats and one of the leading experts on handling him. He made several documentries on both tigers and lions. He stated tiger would win. He even said the out come of the show was completely wrong and baseless.

Your expert, is a zoo keeper.......you know a job any smuck can do with no education. In fact her job is to clean animal shit up. Good job there champ/ 🙄

next time do you research before belieivng everything you see on tv. That show also concluded that a cougar would lose to a wolf, becuase it fall off a moutain....that was the most likely scnerio they said........

documented evidence... of lions & tigers capabilities

none of a Tiger killing a Lion
in the WILD... not captive in a gladitor pit 😬
not in a ZOO 😬

a wild encounter of 1 lion fighting 1 tiger... thats what you are not getting 😬

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
In highschool my bus used to drive past bears on the way to and from the dump all the time. lol

Canadian man with knife > bear. Canadians are the fiercest predator in the animal kingdom! 😱

http://outdoornewsdaily.com/index.php/archives/546

Are you talking about hairy, fat, gay men?

see hammer thats why I hate debating you

you're stubborn and choose to remain ignorant even when others provide evidence that show your stance to be foolish

a cougar falling off a mountain shows the wolf is more mobile...so it still is relevant if the fight takes place in a mountain.

but you just bash anything that disagrees with you.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
In highschool my bus used to drive past bears on the way to and from the dump all the time. lol

Canadian man with knife > bear. Canadians are the fiercest predator in the animal kingdom! 😱

http://outdoornewsdaily.com/index.php/archives/546

there is another story of a canadian who took down a bear because it attacked his dog

Canadian>tiger>>>>blackbear

lion 7/10

a real life encounter lions 10/10 after g@ngb@nging a tiger

Originally posted by Starscream M
see hammer thats why I hate debating you

you're stubborn and choose to remain ignorant even when others provide evidence that show your stance to be foolish

a cougar falling off a mountain shows the wolf is more mobile...so it still is relevant if the fight takes place in a mountain.

but you just bash anything that disagrees with you.


Guess what the feeling mutual, you are one of the most arrogant gullible moron I have ever had the pleasure of speaking with.

You did not provide evidence. In fact you did the opposite. You provided a show thats all about ratings and tried to pass it off as evidence. In the show it self it even says not to take what they say as fact, that just there conclusion, not what would happen. I provided evidences. docummented evidence. Lots of it actaully. Yet you keep on ignoring it like ignorant moron you are.

Actaully if you did your research the "lion expert" is not an expert at all and is a zoo keep with no credentials.

Dave her opponent is a leading expert on all big cats and did one of the most famous documentrys ever one lions.

Did you just try and tell me a wolf is more mibile then a cougar? Think about what your saying, before typing it. Becuase it just make you look foolish when you state utter nonsense like "wolfs are more mobile then cougars" which is utterly absurd.

Not at all, I just call it as it is. That show was constanstly wrong, went against experts in the field and pretty much pick a scnerio are random and pretended it was likely. Even people one the show said the crap was wrong. Dave was of the people who was on the show the most constantly disagreed with the out comes.

dave was just sore because the tiger lost 😆

you cant be a tiger vs lion specialist
if you've never sat in a tree a video taped the two fighting all you can go off of if who is slightly stronger and who is slightly faster... you cant do that with animals raised to go for kills blows not love taps

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
dave was just sore because the tiger lost 😆

you cant be a tiger vs lion specialist
if you've never sat in a tree a video taped the two fighting all you can go off of if who is slightly stronger and who is slightly faster... you cant do that with animals raised to go for kills blows not love taps


Why would he be sore? He one of the leading lion experts on the planet.

You can be a big cat specialist which is what he is. He spent countless hours with both animals in the wild.

Except we have documented evidence of what happens when they fought to the death and guess what champ the lion died more often then not.

fact you can sit through and ignore documented evidence and pretend your right is astounding.

But I dont care. keep up with your nonsense. when you grow a pair get back to me I more then gladly put you in your place in a battle zone.

documented evidence without variables mate 😬

you still spewing this gladitor pit bologna 😬
gladitor pit = captive
ZOO = captive

im going off what would happen
you going off gladitor books without variables/ what condition the animals were in 😬
they made wounded me fight for FFS
why would they treat animals any different?

tiger goes for the neck... bites fur & is killed

As soon as an animal is captured: -10 atk and -7 def

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Even people one the show said the crap was wrong. Dave was of the people who was on the show the most constantly disagreed with the out comes.

doesn't matter if dave disagreed, as the show's outcome is decided by majority...and they decided a lion would beat a tiger, and also that his mane plays a key role in winning. too bad you don't like it...you can suck it!!!

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
documented evidence without variables mate 😬

you still spewing this gladitor pit bologna 😬
gladitor pit = captive
ZOO = captive

im going off what would happen
you going off gladitor books without variables/ what condition the animals were in 😬
they made wounded me fight for FFS
why would they treat animals any different?

tiger goes for the neck... bites fur & is killed


Gladitor pit = wild animal capture and forced to fight.
They are veyr much wild animals. They were not raised by humans. They were caught and then put into pits to fight. The same shit happen in London which I also stated. In which they wanted to prove Lion superiority, but instead the tiger kept mauling the lions.

No your going off your own personal bias based off nothing.

gotta love cop out.

wounded what? They wanted the Lion to win, why on earth would then injury it? You own logic is simply laughable.

No when big cats fight they do so on there hind leg swatting at one another untill gaining an advantage in which the other flee's or they are beaten down and killed.

Except tigers can bite right through fur easily. Your logic is astounding. Not only have a provided evidence proving that the manes have never been proven to provide any sort of protection against tigers or other lions, but yet you insist this gives them the wing. Man and must be great to be so ignorant as to ignore evidence present to you.

Honestly I just feel bad for you, your obviously handicap in some way.

Originally posted by Starscream M
doesn't matter if dave disagreed, as the show's outcome is decided by majority...and they decided a lion would beat a tiger, and also that his mane plays a key role in winning. too bad you don't like it...you can suck it!!!

Actaully it does becuase he was the only expert present on the show.

No it not decided by the majority. It decided by the producer.

A TV show decided the lion won, that same show said there finding are not what would happen or what most likely happens. Just there opinion. Sweet so a bunch of hollywood people and a zoo keeper thinks a lion wins greta evidence there champ 😉 . However the only expert present not only state they were wrong, but he said there was no evidence backing there findings. And there isent. In fact I posted evidence completely discrediting the myth the lions manes protect them from bites. But thanks for playing along champ 😉