batman v logan sword fight--no healing

Originally posted by jinzin
A tiger would kill a lion in most scenarios.
They are bigger, stronger, and have greater levels of endurance when tackling down prey. (Grappling endurance?)

Besides that, tigers are used to hunting on their own, as opposed to lions. They're simply more effecient stalkers/killers.

BESIDES THAT, Tigers hunt bears mane... what else to you need? lol...

Ahermm I mean, tigers would kill a lion.....

Just like a Wolverine would eat a bat...

😏

just like batman vs wolverine...

a bears neck has thick folds of flesh not a manes & bears are MUCH slower than a tigers

the moment the tigers goes for that THICK mane he better be accurate of run the risk of exposing his neck and having a lion grabbing its throat finishing it off... see?

just like batman vs wolverine 🙂

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
like what you did at the end 🙂...

just like batman vs wolverine...

a bears neck has thick folds of flesh not a manes & bears are MUCH slower than a tigers

the moment the tigers goes for that THICK mane he better be accurate of run the risk of exposing his neck and having a lion grabbing its throat finishing it off... see?

just like batman vs wolverine 🙂

Just food for thought, if a tiger already has hold of a lion's mane... the lion is probably already phucked.

But yes I can see where you're coming from, Bruce trying to attack Wolverine's mane, probably won't do him much good in a fight. 😎