Originally posted by Dum Dum Duganyet I bet if the show decided tiger winning, you would be using it all day... 🙄
Actaully it does becuase he was the only expert present on the show.No it not decided by the majority. It decided by the producer.
A TV show decided the lion won, that same show said there finding are not what would happen or what most likely happens. Just there opinion. Sweet so a bunch of hollywood people and a zoo keeper thinks a lion wins greta evidence there champ 😉 . However the only expert present not only state they were wrong, but he said there was no evidence backing there findings. And there isent. In fact I posted evidence completely discrediting the myth the lions manes protect them from bites. But thanks for playing along champ 😉
Originally posted by Starscream M
yet I bet if the show decided tiger winning, you would be using it all day... 🙄
see I like facts. Not holywood opinions on matter then have very little knolwedge on. I using docommented facts to prove my case, not nonsense opinions of zoo keepers.
which is funny the hypcoracy of you and omega. You keep stating it all about the wild animals. In yet your hanging on the opinion of a lady who only interaction with the animal are in captivity, against a person who has large amounts of first hand knowledge of interacting with both creatures in the wild.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugana saltwater croc will get wtfowned by a great white...I hope you don't think otherwise
not at all, the show is absurdly inaccurate. It had the salt water croc losing to great white shark becuase in mid fight he randomly had to go up for air........which is absurd.......
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
also dum dum
these animals had to fight in shytty conditions, you know that right?fighting after being maimed... ETC
have you even shown me this well documented gladitor evidence 😆?
so every time the tiger mauled the lions? Then lion was injuried and not the tiger? But the people making them fight wanted the lion to win, yea that make sense 🙄
yes I quoted it and stated several books. But thanks for wasting my time as usual. 😉
Originally posted by Dum Dum DuganPM me this gladitor evidence 🙂
They fought in pits. The condition werent that shitty at all. They fought in large sand pits. which actaully helps the lion who actaully lives on plains, Unlike tigers who live in giant jungles and forrests.so every time the tiger mauled the lions? Then lion was injuried and not the tiger? But the people making them fight wanted the lion to win, yea that make sense 🙄
yes I quoted it and stated several books. But thanks for wasting my time as usual. 😉
with the variables of how the conditions were, the weight of the animals that fought,we EITHER animals injured, how long ago was each animals previous fight...you get the drift 🙂
because you still haven't
thank you 🙂
sorry mods
just PM me this gladitor evidence/scientific gladitor studies
A tiger would kill a lion in most scenarios.
They are bigger, stronger, and have greater levels of endurance when tackling down prey. (Grappling endurance?)
Besides that, tigers are used to hunting on their own, as opposed to lions. They're simply more effecient stalkers/killers.
BESIDES THAT, Tigers hunt bears mane... what else to you need? lol...
Originally posted by -Pr-
Guys, back on topic please.
Ahermm I mean, tigers would kill a lion.....
Just like a Wolverine would eat a bat...
😏