Thor w/power gem vs Gladiator (full confidence)

The only person I can think of that has managed to remove one during a fight was Thor and that's because it wasn't actually connected to Drax, it was just sitting in his stomach.

No one else has tried and failed AFAIK (except Surfer).

What makes you think it would take a lot of strength (at least herald level) to just take the gem off someone's head?

SS could have removed the IG from Thanos if he wouldn't have missed.

^ Bullshit 😂, Mephisto tried it and failed he had his hands on the gauntlet.

Originally posted by h1a8
He's not. A non holding back Thor (like the one who fought the celestials)

is more powerful than a normal Thor (one who holds back) with the PG for the first

HOUR.

After those few moments Thor with the PG becomes more powerful.

Try to read what I wrote in context next time.

.

Originally posted by PIKEY GUNDAM
I remember you from Herochat hahaha you're a troll.

.

Originally posted by PIKEY GUNDAM
I will, hahah Quanshe you're cool and funny. You're not as cool as the Judge or Whirly though.

.

Originally posted by PIKEY GUNDAM
.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor wasn't holding back at all in blood and thunder so you have no point. You didn't read the arc nor do you ever make any sense.

You misread my post. I didn't say a non holding back Thor is more powerful than the Thor in blood and thunder. I said he is more powerful than a normal (non holding back Thor) with PG for the first hour.

Originally posted by h1a8
You misread my post. I didn't say a non holding back Thor is more powerful than the Thor in blood and thunder. I said he is more powerful than a normal (non holding back Thor) with PG for the first hour.

what is a none holding back Thor and what is a normal Thor? what's the difference?

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
what is a none holding back Thor and what is a normal Thor? what's the difference?

Thor like Clark holds back out of fear of killing. If Thor fights in character then he would not unleash as fully as he is capable of.

So a normal Thor holds back
and a non holding back Thor doesn't (when he has no choice or is too emotionally angered).

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why is Thor holding back ? You just make statements that you can't prove. You do it over and over again.

Same reason Superman starts off holding back. Thor wouldn't just immediately hit someone with all his strength, unless he knows he has no choice or is too emotionally angered.

Originally posted by h1a8
Same reason Superman starts off holding back. Thor wouldn't just immediately hit someone with all his strength, unless he knows he has no choice or is too emotionally angered.

Originally posted by h1a8
Same reason Superman starts off holding back. Thor wouldn't just immediately hit someone with all his strength, unless he knows he has no choice or is too emotionally angered.

about that, Thor has tangled with Gladiator on some occasions already. He knows that he'll get his ass kicked if he doesnt go all out. So yeah, i'm pretty sure Thor would bring out his A game against Gladiator off the bat.

I agree. I just feel Glads (under full capacity) is too fast for Thor.
He can simply take the gem and it would be spite here in his favor.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Well the Thor who hit Thanos from blood and thunder wasn't holding back.

A non holding back Thor>>>a normal Thor with PG (for first hour).

Here Thor would most likely hold back (some argued that he won't) and thus making him weaker with the PG (in the first hour) than if he didn't hold back in the first place.

Actually, it is a better fight if Thor doesn't have the gem. Otherwise Glads can take it and it will be spite now.

wtf?