Originally posted by -Pr-
Guys, hyperbole, as you well know, isn't really valid in debates, because most of the time it's contradictory.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Though I agree. I not sure this counts as hyperbole. There nothing that really contradicts it, and it was not simply random statement, it was actual number reed was given while tracking gladiators movement. I posted the scan some were in this thread.
Not what I was referring to. Was talking more about the "will" thing.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Guys, hyperbole, as you well know, isn't really valid in debates, because most of the time it's contradictory.
Its kind of different if Reed and Professor X file is saying this. That's like me saying "the info Batman have on every member of the JLA is a lie" when all in all, EVERYTHING Batman has documented on each super human is true.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Not what I was referring to. Was talking more about the "will" thing.
also can you tell me how impressive this is?
I just dont know much about ego, or what happen here, I found it in the respect thread.
Originally posted by carver9
Its kind of different if Reed and Professor X file is saying this. That's like me saying "the info Batman have on every member of the JLA is a lie" when all in all, EVERYTHING Batman has documented on each super human is true.
Originally posted by carver9
Huh?Why would that be hyperbole when Gladiators powers thrive off of his will power?
because you can't apply a no limits fallacy to it.
shit, john byrne superman used to have pretty similar things said about him, and we know he wasn't limitless.
Originally posted by carver9
Its kind of different if Reed and Professor X file is saying this. That's like me saying "the info Batman have on every member of the JLA is a lie" when all in all, EVERYTHING Batman has documented on each super human is true.
what are you talking about?
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Oh my mistake. I thought you were talking about the 100 times light speed statement. Sorryalso can you tell me how impressive this is?
I just dont know much about ego, or what happen here, I found it in the respect thread.
it's a pretty decent feat. any context in particular you're asking about?
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
can you please provide evidence of these files?
http://img354.imageshack.us/i/glad2jf0.jpg/
Here is Reeds file.
Originally posted by carver9
http://img354.imageshack.us/i/glad2jf0.jpg/Here is Reeds file.
what prof x say?
Originally posted by -Pr-
because you can't apply a no limits fallacy to it.shit, john byrne superman used to have pretty similar things said about him, and we know he wasn't limitless.
what are you talking about?
it's a pretty decent feat. any context in particular you're asking about?
Reed files being on point along with shield files, batman files, and professor x files which wouldn't be hyperbole statements.
Originally posted by carver9
http://img354.imageshack.us/i/glad2jf0.jpg/Here is Reeds file.
that's nothing that hasn't been said about most top tier heroes.
it's not really proof of anything.
Originally posted by carver9
Reed files being on point along with shield files, batman files, and professor x files which wouldn't be hyperbole statements.
yes, it would, because it's vague, unqauntified statements.
and it's still hyperbole.
here it states he vulnerable to magic again. however to be fair this it not evidence, but rather secondary source if that.
Originally posted by carver9
http://img354.imageshack.us/i/glad2jf0.jpg/Here is Reeds file.
In the same issue Masterson stalemates Gladiator in physical strength.
