Thor speed vs Wolverine/Spiderman vs Batman speed

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
Are you trolling, or are you just plain stupid? He said Thor has no speed feats. Those are two speed feats. Do I really need to post 20 speed feats? I could have posted one and made my point.

Pull out your bloody rag, replace it, take 10 deep breaths, then come back to your computer.

....

That's better, now isn't it?

Now then, in regards to Thor's speed, if you were trying to show that Thor is faster than Wolverine/Spider-man, or hell, even Batman, with those two scans, you failed. He has much better feats to choose from, so try again.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
It's like I'm psychic:

AM was a statue to Spiderman.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
So you're saying he's shown to be slower or he just hasn't shown anything? That's what I'm asking.

I'm saying he is depicted as being slower, and I believe it is an intentional decision by Marvel's Editorial Staff to keep Thor shackled to the Hulk's level.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
He doesn't have unlimited ammo, though. And Wolverine doesn't have to tank every pumpkin bomb, he can evade them.

Originally posted by carver9
The lighting had nothing to do with Wolverine vanishing during mid shot. Then his back was turned the entire time so he basically jumped of during the time they pressed the trigger.

Lack of light makes people harder to track, which would work in Wolverine's favor.

However, that was only an afterthought...my main point was that Thor did far more in his scan than simply move a few feet.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I'm saying he is depicted as being slower, and I believe it is an intentional decision by Marvel's Editorial Staff to keep Thor shackled to the Hulk's level.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I try to educate some one on the fact that wolverine is a superhuman and that there is not significant gap in speed like there is between superman and flash.

what about that pissed you off enough for such a long post? I mean do I really need to read it or did you just assume I argueing something else?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin

Do you really need someone to explain the difference between narrowly beating an opponent to a punch, and being depicted as stationary while an opponent dances around said stationary characters? Really? REALLY?

So sad.

Haha, it's like you didn't even look at the scans. Thor wasn't barely beating him to the punch, he was f*cking wrecking him: "How can I fight 'Im? He's everywhere at once!!"

But because Thor didn't do a flip or leave some blurry lines it's apparently not impressive.

This is sad? I'm not the one who took the stance that Thor is at best peak human in speed and is even slower than them.

Originally posted by SamZED
lol no. sorry if it seemed like im pissed off or trying to attack. Was not my intent. Dont think that Superman/Flash comparison can be taken literally. That'd be impossible to count.
Again, sorry.

Anyways, you played any new games lately?

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Ok, it was just that I read you say he is slower because he "lacks" the feats, as in he doesn't have enough or any. If that was what you were saying I didn't think it was fair, but I guess you meant something else.

He has speed feats, every character does in one form or another, the problem is his speed feats aren't better than the cream of the crop of street level peak humans. Thor has impressive flight/movement speed feats, and his hammer is capable of FTL, but he doesn't have any combat speed feats that put him even in the same ball park as someone like Spider-man.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
He has speed feats, every character does in one form or another, the problem is his speed feats aren't better than the cream of the crop of street level peak humans. Thor has impressive flight/movement speed feats, and his hammer is capable of FTL, but he doesn't have any combat speed feats that put him even in the same ball park as someone like Spider-man.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Lack of light makes people harder to track, which would work in Wolverine's favor.

However, that was only an afterthought...my main point was that Thor did far more in his scan than simply move a few feet.

Lack of light had nothing to do with him vanishing. They seen everything pretty well before shooting at him.

This scan should end our discussion.

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/1830/strategyte6.jpg

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Haha, it's like you didn't even look at the scans. Thor wasn't barely beating him to the punch, he was f*cking wrecking him: "How can I fight 'Im? He's everywhere at once!!"

But because Thor didn't do a flip or leave some blurry lines it's apparently not impressive.

This is sad? I'm not the one who took the stance that Thor is at best peak human in speed and is even slower than them.

Unless your argument is that in between panels Thor was after imaging all over the place I'm not really sure what your point is? What was on panel was Thor dodging the wrecking ball, and beating Absorbing Man to the punch... it's not even remotely comparable to Spider-man seemingly being in a dozen places at once while Absorbing Man is completely stationary.

No you are the one who took the opposite stance in a supposedly absurd, one side argument... and yet can't produce a single feat to disprove me.

Why haven't I seen scans of Spidaman blitzing Thor yet?

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Why haven't I seen scans of Spidaman blitzing Thor yet?

They've never fought?

Originally posted by carver9
Lack of light had nothing to do with him vanishing. They seen everything pretty well before shooting at him.

This scan should end our discussion.

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/1830/strategyte6.jpg

Anticipatory movement based on an opponent's combat patterns is a bona fide speed feat now?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
They've never fought?

You let me down Srank. I thought one of you would have that on tap... I just don't want to look for it.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
They've never fought?

They've fought before and Spiderman was blitzing the hell out of him. They fought in the Avengers mansion.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Stand your ground minion!

Anyways, you played any new games lately?

Sadly, no. Too much work.🙁 But I know im gonna play SF vs Tekken when it comes out even if I have to give up sleep. Have ou seen the trailer? EPIC!y

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Unless your argument is that in between panels Thor was after imaging all over the place I'm not really sure what your point is? What was on panel was Thor dodging the wrecking ball, and beating Absorbing Man to the punch... it's not even comparable to Spider-man seemingly being in a dozen places at once.

No you are the one who took the opposite stance in a supposedly absurd, one side argument... and yet can't produce a single feat to disprove me.

Once again: Blurry after images do not automatically make something more impressive. Stupid.

Lol. Okay:
http://i989.photobucket.com/albums/af17/RageOfOlympus/Thor/ReactsMicroSecond.jpg

Tell me why that's peak human at best.