Osama Bin Laden Killed

Started by inimalist31 pages
Originally posted by Daemon Seed
True enough; however, most papers believed he still had some say up to 2007.

I wouldn't doubt it, I'd just question how relevant that say was. the big groups now, like AQ in the Arabian peninsula or AQ in the Islamic Maghreb aren't even affiliated with them in anything but name, and even AQ in Iraq under zarquai was largely independent. the 2001 invasion did really crush his specific network.

like, he certainly wasn't the brains behind Madrid, and even for 911, he was a financier much more than a planner, as he was for most of his life after the soviet invasion.

Originally posted by inimalist
I wouldn't doubt it, I'd just question how relevant that say was. the big groups now, like AQ in the Arabian peninsula or AQ in the Islamic Maghreb aren't even affiliated with them in anything but name, and even AQ in Iraq under zarquai was largely independent. the 2001 invasion did really crush his specific network.

like, he certainly wasn't the brains behind Madrid, and even for 911, he was a financier much more than a planner, as he was for most of his life after the soviet invasion.

Nah, Yemen is the main base as far as I see it. Another reason for America to leave Asia.

AQAP is based out of Yemen

Originally posted by inimalist
AQAP is based out of Yemen

You missed understood, the 'Nah' was a coloquial british agreement about he was not involved in Madrid.

Originally posted by Daemon Seed
You missed understood, the 'Nah' was a coloquial british agreement about he was not involved in Madrid.

oh, it means disagreement this side

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
And not one of those SEALS had a cell cam to vid it?

Bull to the shit.

I smell BS too.

YouTube video

a good description of the compound OBL was in

Originally posted by Prep-Man
I smell BS too.

Seriously? These are special ops guys, the only recording equipment they would have is their helmet cams and the army doesn't want to release that kind of stuff for the same reasons they usually don't want to.

God youtube is on fire with comments...I haven't read the ones up here yet. So Bin Laden is dead now and there's a group that believes it and a group that doesn't. I figure that some people are overly skeptical to the point where they don't believe anything unless they said it. I believe it cause if he wasn't killed in this operation Obama would have to deal with a bunch of SOLDIERS claiming that he was lying. Lots of citizens will call him a liar no matter what he does cause they hate him and most of the people who look like him. F@ck them, they represent a fading minority. Soldiers have been given the credit now and if Bush could have he would have LOVED to give the credit to them under a republican administration. It's asinine to think that he wouldn't if he could. As far as proof goes America is not the only country Al-queda has attacked under Bin Laden. Leaders of other countries would want more than the speech for verification, thus the DNA sample, fingerprints and visual would be enough for the people with the actual corpse. If the possibility of OBL showing up on the scene alive still existed then the announcement would be extremely risky. 😮‍💨

wonder how south parks version would go 😂

if only he didn't died on that jersey episode

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Seriously? These are special ops guys, the only recording equipment they would have is their helmet cams and the army doesn't want to release that kind of stuff for the same reasons they usually don't want to.

have we ever seen cell phone videos from a special ops force?

Originally posted by inimalist
have we ever seen cell phone videos from a special ops force?

You can actually find helmet cam stuff from spec ops people on YouTube. I'm guessing that is stuff that involves no classified information or impropriety by the operators.

Oh I saw a great response to this on 4chan:
"Show us Osama's death certificate!"

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You can actually find helmet cam stuff from spec ops people on YouTube. I'm guessing that is stuff that involves no classified information or impropriety by the operators.

The ones I found were all from the militaries themselves

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
wonder how south parks version would go 😂

if only he didn't died on that jersey episode

Osama actually died before that...in an episode made shortly after 9/11.

Not to mention Sadam Hussein once inexplicably returned to life from Heaven in SP after his RL capture.

Originally posted by The MISTER
I figure that some people are overly skeptical to the point where they don't believe anything unless they said it.

I have a feeling that the people who wrote the bible and formulated christianity felt the same way.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
No, not really. When Al Qaida beheads Americans and then post it on the internet, it seems more befitting of their typical behavior. I woudn't expect them to give an American POW a proper burial with a grave-marker. That's the whole point: in a war, competing sides have historically never been all that respectful of the enemy dead. That's why Xerxes crucified Leonidas' body uspide down. And frankly, a burial at sea for bin Laden was too respectful. They should have planted that SOB's head on a wooden stake.

By the way, it wasn't "3,000 Americans". It was less than 3,000 and citizens from over 90 different countries were killed. Including yours.


If that's your view that's fine. If terrorist do it, we should do it too. Logically, you're the same as terrorists and thus have absolutely no right to complain at their actions - since you're employing the same level of morality, practices and such.
Your're organised terrorist with better weaponry and they're nomadic ones with crappy weaponry. It just goes back and forth.

How many people died from few other countries in the twin towers isn't going draw any sympathy from me - all the people Mourning the victims of 9/11 are mourning the attack on Americans not on some Africans, Europeans or Asians that happen to be in that tower.
Don't even try to make this as some ''international'' incident, because it's not. It was not an attack on Africans, it was not an attack on East Asians, nor Russians, nor Swiss - it was an attack on Americans.
And if we follow ''they do it, so should we, plus add some 2500 years old war practices'' - it was a fair game.
.

That sounds a lot like 'eye for an eye' justice. To some extent I can see the logic behind your argument. But Ghandi said that this line of thought would only leave the whole world blind. He also said that a person who maintains his dogma in order to appear consistant always ends up driving himself into a false position.

Loving the denial and conspiracy speculations in this thread, you guys crack me up 👆

Originally posted by skekUng
That sounds a lot like 'eye for an eye' justice. To some extent I can see the logic behind your argument. But Ghandi said that this line of thought would only leave the whole world blind. He also said that a person who maintains his dogma in order to appear consistant always ends up driving himself into a false position.

I agree. In fact, I hate the ''eye for an eye'' justice - because that isn't justice, it's revenge.

Maybe I wasn't clear in my post, but I was replying to Quiero Mota's idea that ''if terrorists are beasts we should be beasts too''.
To me, that attitude is counter-productive and dangerous.