Originally posted by carver9
When you have Thor tanking hits from a pissed Celestial on more than one occasion... taking hits from Mangog, the destroyer, surviving an initial attack from a being that has consumed 10000 gods, taking hits from Ego (in the past), tanking hits from a pissed Odin... Galactus, it comes to question if there are many if any Heralds that are durable than him.No Herald to my knowledge have any feats resembling this. NONE. There are some things that I'm not even including.
No Herald imo is above Thor.
Don't forget the disregarding Superman feats part.
Originally posted by carver9
When you have Thor tanking hits from a pissed Celestial on more than one occasion... taking hits from Mangog, the destroyer, surviving an initial attack from a being that has consumed 10000 gods, taking hits from Ego (in the past), tanking hits from a pissed Odin... Galactus, it comes to question if there are many if any Heralds that are durable than him.No Herald to my knowledge have any feats resembling this. NONE. There are some things that I'm not even including.
No Herald imo is above Thor.
Thor has never tanked a hit by anyone herald level or above.
If you mean survive a hit then yes he has, but not tank a hit.
You must understand what 'tank' means ok.
Second, the comment was about blunt force durability.
Thor's top durability feats was against energy projection, not blunt force durability. You said, "tanking hits from a pissed Celestial", when the Celestial didn't hit Thor physically but only with energy projection. Mangog may have hit Thor and maybe Destroyer (not sure). But any herald being (whether low herald or high herald) can survive physical hits from Mangog or Destroyer.
Do you think energy projection durability is the same as blunt force durability?
Originally posted by h1a8
Thor has never tanked a hit by anyone herald level or above.
If you mean survive a hit then yes he has, but not tank a hit.
You must understand what 'tank' means ok.Second, the comment was about blunt force durability.
Thor's top durability feats was against energy projection, not blunt force durability. You said, "tanking hits from a pissed Celestial", when the Celestial didn't hit Thor physically but only with energy projection. Mangog may have hit Thor and maybe Destroyer (not sure). But any herald being (whether low herald or high herald) can survive physical hits from Mangog or Destroyer.Do you think energy projection durability is the same as blunt force durability?
That post was just filled with contradictions....... 🙄 Mangog and Destroyer are herald level.
Originally posted by carver9
Come on Pr... we both know the truth to this statement. I know them but overall, Thor feats are better imo. Hell, Thor feats against gods and abstracts are better than Thanos.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
YouTube video
😆 😆
Originally posted by rotiartcurrent drax couldnt fly, had no energy projection powers and was nowhere near a class 100 or class 20 for that matter, his durabilty was also lowered to below bulletptoof too. He was explciitly called a different charatce ron panela nd had no herald level feats. he was depowered down to a meta and yet, when facing thanos, his body generated a green light aura, never seen before or again, that cut thrgouh thanos's purple energy signature/force-field and ripped his heart out. there very much is a draxforce
Prove this statement. Drax has not been shown to have a "Thanos neutralizing" power... He was made to be incredibly powerful to neutralize Thanos. Seriously I submit all this talk about a "drax force" is a farce.