Originally posted by dadudemon
Ahhhh. Thanks for the clarification. I did not realize how heavily influenced higher thought processes were by lower ones (not the obvious ones, but more subtle abstract ones like conceptual attractivness versus purely biological traits.)The visual cortex psychologist pulls through for me. pained
ya, sorry it wasn't a full answer, but I figured that was the main issue you were talking about. I'm not aware of either of the studies you brought up, so I can't speak to them specifically, but none of that is overly surprising.
I'd point out though, in this case, we aren't talking about low level influencing high level, we are talking about behavior being motivated by things that these higher or declarative centers may never be aware of. it's similar to the libet research, where motivation to act comes after your body has already prepared to make the action. in many ways, our declarative, conscious mind plays a secondary role in determining our behavior (damn auto correct keeps taking the "u" out of that).
this actually is also somewhat important with regard to the infant looking stuff. c-master wants to interpret longer looking as a measure of attraction, whereas it could be that more symmetric faces simply draw our attention better, and because we attend to things more, a consequence might be that we rate them as more attractive. if that makes sense.