Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Hey I agree with you, but they are the franchise as much as the first two. *Shrugs*
clive barker wrote 1 & 2. thats why they were awesome and also why the later whorings should not be applied to the true characters.
this whole thread is based on turning an awesome story into a trite set of action movie feats which is not the point of hellraiser. it was not an action movie and the chains were not a goddamn fighting weapon.
yeah i get it. "it counts because it's in the series" but it's ****ing stupid. it's just as silly as suggesting that superman has the ability to build brick structures with his mind because superman 4. this whole topic is aids.
Originally posted by focus4chumpsIt is a versus topic in which you're supposed to be objective as to who wins. Set aside your personal preferences which is subjective and bias.
clive barker wrote 1 & 2. thats why they were awesome and also why the later whorings should not be applied to the true characters.this whole thread is based on turning an awesome story into a trite set of action movie feats which is not the point of hellraiser. it was not an action movie and the chains were not a goddamn fighting weapon.
yeah i get it. "it counts because it's in the series" but it's ****ing stupid. it's just as silly as suggesting that superman has the ability to build brick structures with his mind because superman 4. this whole topic is aids.
Originally posted by focus4chumps
clive barker wrote 1 & 2. thats why they were awesome and also why the later whorings should not be applied to the true characters.this whole thread is based on turning an awesome story into a trite set of action movie feats which is not the point of hellraiser. it was not an action movie and the chains were not a goddamn fighting weapon.
yeah i get it. "it counts because it's in the series" but it's ****ing stupid. it's just as silly as suggesting that superman has the ability to build brick structures with his mind because superman 4. this whole topic is aids.
I know, I know... But that's what the OP wanted to debate...
Originally posted by focus4chumps
clive barker wrote 1 & 2. thats why they were awesome and also why the later whorings should not be applied to the true characters.this whole thread is based on turning an awesome story into a trite set of action movie feats which is not the point of hellraiser. it was not an action movie and the chains were not a goddamn fighting weapon.
yeah i get it. "it counts because it's in the series" but it's ****ing stupid. it's just as silly as suggesting that superman has the ability to build brick structures with his mind because superman 4. this whole topic is aids.
Guess what? Any version of Superman would get the shit smacked out of him by Pinhead just like another user above said
The Doctor gets the hooked chains in his ass before the fight even begins.
Pinhead mega Stomps.
Originally posted by HorrorMoviesFocus has gone into hiding. He probably won't come back in this thread.
Guess what? Any version of Superman would get the shit smacked out of him by Pinhead just like another user above saidThe Doctor gets the hooked chains in his ass before the fight even begins.
Pinhead mega Stomps.
Originally posted by Robtard
Maybe you should jump on the 'HorrorMovies' account and demand one there too, sockboi.
So he and I are one person with 2 accounts why? Just because we both know Pinhead would ***** slap the Doctor and wreck his ******* into pieces and pat him on the head like a kitten just for fun... Pinhead would butt **** Doctor Channard with hooked chains just to have the time of his life.
Originally posted by HorrorMoviesRobtard doesn't care about debating just emotions and sticking up for his man.
So he and I are one person with 2 accounts why? Just because we both know Pinhead would ***** slap the Doctor and wreck his ******* into pieces and pat him on the head like a kitten just for fun... Pinhead would butt **** Doctor Channard with hooked chains just to have the time of his life.
Pinhead unquestionably wins this thread.