Steve Rogers Vs Slade Wilson

Originally posted by Daredevil1
He was once debating with me on Cap skill/mind. He asked for references for his mind being enhanced and for the statements.

As we had not finished that debate. And then in another debate, I caught him making the claim that Cap does indeed have a enhanced mind.

So he used the claim to suit him and when it doesn't he'll back pedal. And now he's asking for proof again on it.

I won't give him his supply and demand since he's shown to use it when it suits him and won't use it when it doesn't.

Thats not hypocrisy I made that statement round about the time we were having that debate in that thread. If you look at this post this was made AFTER I made that one.

Originally posted by Deadline

..........is that it? You decided it's a major factor based on that? There is craploads of evidence that suggest that Cap doesn't have an enhanced brain, that people don't even know or/and it's not a major factor. Bios, on-panel evidence, series editor in-chief Ralp Maccio, a depowered Cap never stating that a lack of SSS has ever affected his fighting skill in terms of intelligence....and you're arguing it's not a stretch?

😬

No it isn't far fetched it's far fetched to argue it's a major factor. Even if you want to argue that he has enhanced intelligence it seems most people don't know.

With all due respect it's like you suddenly decided that his enhanced brain is a major factor based on nothing. Could I please have scans or direct quote of people stating that Cap has enhanced intellect please.

What you can clearly see from the post is that my opinion on this subject had started to change because you were making weak arguments.

Why didn't you call me a hypocrite then? Hell you didn't even answer the question.

So before the debate had started I beilieved that Cap could have enhanced intelligence but as the debate went on I started to serioulsy doubt you knew what you were talking about. Which is why my last post said this.

Originally posted by Deadline

Can I also please have these references where it states that Cap has enhanced intelligence. Issue number and direct quote if possible.

You're basically asking somebody for proof because somebody isn't making credible arguments is hypocrisy.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Thats what I thought was being argued. And I agree with you.

You weren't even there.....

Originally posted by Deadline

You weren't even there.....

And I agree with him, not having to show you anty evidence, based upon the fact uve used the same argument when it fit your purpose in prior debates.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Why would I have to be there? Your asking for prove of Capt enhanced mind, despite the fact you stated it as a fact in other debates. This I have seen first hand from you.

And I agree with him, not having to show you anty evidence, based upon the fact uve used the same argument when it fit your purpose in prior debates.

Ok heres my explanation.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
deadline, uve claimed capt had an enhance mind a number of times, so I dont get why all of sudden your asking for proof. why would you claim something as a fact, if you your self never seen evidence for it?

Becuase I said it because Dardevil1 said it. In the past he has been able to back it up his points and I have asked him for references, but when I got into a debate with him where he was arguing that his enhanced intelligence was a major factor I started to doubt wether it was even true he had enhanced intelligence in the first place. He didn't call me a hypocrite then, why now?

Hell this is a DS vs Cap thread not sure if arguing Cap doesn't have enhanced intelligence suits me.

Originally posted by Deadline
Thats not hypocrisy I made that statement round about the time we were having that debate in that thread. If you look at this post this was made AFTER I made that one.

What you can clearly see from the post is that my opinion on this subject had started to change because you were making weak arguments.

Why didn't you call me a hypocrite then? Hell you didn't even answer the question.

So before the debate had started I beilieved that Cap could have enhanced intelligence but as the debate went on I started to serioulsy doubt you knew what you were talking about. Which is why my last post said this.

You're basically asking somebody for proof because somebody isn't making credible arguments is hypocrisy.

Asking for some one to proof a claim and then making the claim your self and not being able to prove it is being a hypocrite.

You used the evidence in another debate when it suits you and then demand it in another when it doesn't.

You must prove it since you made the claim. Look for it because I'm not going to give you any reference for it. Now matter how much you ask for it.

Not my fault you made the claim without evidence and then demand it in another debate separate from our won.

You use it when it suits you. And you lose it when it doesn't. No point in referencing it to someone who uses logic in this manner. It becomes moot or beating a dear horse.

You've are in a double standard/hypocrisy and I won't give you any type of reference.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Thats what I thought was being argued. And I agree with you.

Fact of the matter is he claimed it.

He himself needs to subject himself to his own underlining scrutiny for evidence of it. He can back peddal all he wants now about that he changed his mind.

But he made the claim. To bad....so sad.

Originally posted by Daredevil1
Asking for some one to proof a claim and then making the claim your self and not being able to prove it is being a hypocrite.

You used the evidence in another debate when it suits you and then demand it in another when it doesn't.

You must prove it since you made the claim. Look for it because I'm not going to give you any reference for it. Now matter how much you ask for it.

Not my fault you made the claim without evidence and then demand it in another debate separate from our won.

You use it when it suits you. And you lose it when it doesn't. No point in referencing it to someone who uses logic in this manner. It becomes moot or beating a dear horse.

You've are in a double standard/hypocrisy and I won't give you any type of reference.

Damn shame thought you were different.

Sorry to thread derail (I've been busy) but...did someone REALLY make a fake Space Mummy account? (on page 14 or so). I thought my account was restricted.

What happened there?

My bad.

bump

Cap wins.

Nothing changed Namor, CAP WINS NO MATTER WHAT!!!!

deathstroke wins.....for all the same reasons.

Im actually pleasantly suprised about the outcome of this thread. Much more than one could ever hope to expect on these boards.lol

Yea...nobody believed you the last time you tried claiming that this board was biased towards Cap and against Slade.

What makes you think they'll believe you this time?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Slade Wilson. He beat Batman with ease I just can't see Cap replicating.

Wouldnt say that this board is biased towards Cap and is anti-Slade particulary.. but I did notice that KMC is slightly Marvel biased in general.

Originally posted by SamZED
Wouldnt say that this board is biased towards Cap and is anti-Slade particulary.. but I did notice that KMC is slightly Marvel biased in general.

I would have said it was about even...

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yea...nobody believed you the last time you tried claiming that this board was biased towards Cap and against Slade.

What makes you think they'll believe you this time?

Originally posted by BattleMage
If Cap was pissed off, Then yeah.

Many more posters are Marvel biased, since some of the "DC biased" posters got banned.

I'm obviously referring to Kris Blaze, that biased bastard ahah

Originally posted by Bentley
Many more posters are Marvel biased, since some of the "DC biased" posters got banned.

I'm obviously referring to Kris Blaze, that biased bastard ahah

LOL! He was DC biased??