Thor (without Mjolnir) VS Wolverine

Started by capt it up78 pages

Originally posted by His Airness
I bet you think so...... 🙄

ya I know thats why I said it.............

Would this be a sufficient enough battlespeed feat?

Wolverine owned. The end.

Originally posted by capt it up
ya I know thats why I said it.............

let this thread die. thor wins 10/10

If Thor has WW durability. Thor dies. Thor is dead,dead,dead.

Originally posted by Alfheim
If Thor has WW durability. Thor dies. Thor is dead,dead,dead.

shock

🙄

Originally posted by Alfheim
🙄

😐

Well I dont know why your looking so shocked that I said Thor loses.

Originally posted by Rick/Genis
Would this be a sufficient enough battlespeed feat?

Not very impressive. Hardly a speed feat. Most heroes can move / fight just as fast.

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
Not very impressive. Hardly a speed feat. Most heroes can move / fight just as fast.

Thor's faster.....

Maybe Thor is faster than Wolverine when it comes down to fighting. But it won't be much.

And Wolverine definitely is a better fighter. I can't understand why people think Thor is a better fighter when feats show otherwise : when he doesn't use his hammer, Thor is just an average fighter.

The fact that Thor is much older, doesn't impress me in the least. I go by feats, and based on what I've read, Wolverine is the better fighter. By far by the way.

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
Maybe Thor is faster than Wolverine when it comes down to fighting. But it won't be much.

And Wolverine definitely is a better fighter. I can't understand why people think Thor is a better fighter when feats show otherwise : when he doesn't use his hammer, Thor is just an average fighter.

The fact that Thor is much older, doesn't impress me in the least. I go by feats, and based on what I've read, Wolverine is the better fighter. By far by the way.

It actually is by a lot.

You act as if Thor has no h2h feats. I'll post them if you like.

Without his hammer he's an average fighter? Most of his h2h feats are done without Mjolnir.

............

Originally posted by His Airness
It actually is by a lot.

You act as if Thor has no h2h feats. I'll post them if you like.

Without his hammer he's an average fighter? Most of his h2h feats are done without Mjolnir.

............


I don't say he's a bad fighter. Just average.

Ask people to make a list of the 50 best fighters of the MU, and Thor would barely be mentioned. Wolverine however is top ten material.

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
I don't say he's a bad fighter. Just average.

Ask people to make a list of the 50 best fighters of the MU, and Thor would barely be mentioned. Wolverine however is top ten material.

ok......

.

Originally posted by Arctic
.
..

Originally posted by Rick/Genis
Would this be a sufficient enough battlespeed feat?

it COULD be, but not NEARLY enough to outsrip Wolverine.. Where Thor's moved almost faster than the eye can register.. Wolverine's moved FASTER and done that kind of feat near a dozen times.

Originally posted by jinzin
it COULD be, but not NEARLY enough to outsrip Wolverine.. Where Thor's moved almost faster than the eye can register.. Wolverine's moved FASTER and done that kind of feat near a dozen times.
I would like to see Wolverine move fast enough to make a ditch to divert Lava mhm

.