Originally posted by Silent Master
You can't admit that Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to break off his horn and then go back to claiming that Thor [b]"couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability". [/B]
Because breaking a horn is nothing? It's like cracking a tooth. Thor's best attacks could only superficially wound Mangog... that was the entire point of the issue, and it was spelled out with giant flashing lights with arrows pointing at it in the conclusion.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Because breaking a horn is nothing? It's like cracking a tooth. Thor's best attacks could only superficially wound Mangog... that was the entire point of the issue, and it was spelled out with giant flashing lights with arrows pointing at it in the conclusion.
Again, You can't admit that Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to break off his horn and then go back to claiming that Thor "couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability".
Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, You can't admit that Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to break off his horn and then go back to claiming that Thor "couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability".
Superficial damage is superficial damage. Thor accomplished the equivalent of slightly denting the bumper of a car.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Superficial damage is superficial damage. Thor accomplished the equivalent of slightly denting the bumper of a car.
You can't admit that Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to break off his horn and then go back to claiming that Thor "couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability".
Originally posted by Silent Master
You can't admit that Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to break off his horn and then go back to claiming that Thor "couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability".
Come up with a valid point or don't bother posting just for the sake of getting the last word in. If you continue to troll this thread I will start using the report function.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You ignoring my point doesn't make it invalid. Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to do damage, that makes your statement of "he couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability". a lie.
Your point is completely baseless. Thor managed to accomplish some minor, superficial damage. How does that contradict my statement? Would I be wrong if I said a mosquito can't do any damage to me, because it can bite me? No. It's relative. Thor couldn't do anything of note to Mangog so he had to change tactics... IT WAS THE WHOLE POINT OF THE STORY. Are you going to come up with something valid to contribute or are you just going to broken all record all night? A heads up would be nice so I know if I can get some sleep without missing anything important.
Where's OneDumbGO? At least he puts some effort in.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Your point is completely baseless. Thor managed to accomplish some minor, superficial damage. How does that contradict my statement? Would I be wrong if I said a mosquito can't do any damage to me, because it can bite me? No. It's relative. Thor couldn't do anything of note to Mangog so he had to change tactics... IT WAS THE WHOLE POINT OF THE STORY. Are you going to come up with something valid to contribute or are you just going to broken all record all night? A heads up would be nice so I know if I can get some sleep without missing anything important.Where's OneDumbGO? At least he puts some effort in.
Again, You ignoring my point doesn't make it invalid. Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to do damage, that makes your statement of "he couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability". a lie.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, You ignoring my point doesn't make it invalid. Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to do damage, that makes your statement of "he couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability". a lie.
You're "point," such as it is, has been addressed ad nauseum. You aren't obligated to post, if you don't have anything to contribute, then you don't have to.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
You're "point," such as it is, has been addressed ad nauseum. You aren't obligated to post, if you don't have anything to contribute, then you don't have to.
You ignoring my point isn't addressing it, Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to do damage, which makes your statement of "he couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability". a lie.
Either admit it was a lie or explain how Thor can damage someone when he can't "do shit to their outward invulnerability".
Originally posted by Silent Master
You ignoring my point isn't addressing it, Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to do damage, which makes your statement of "he couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability". a lie.
I've addressed your "point" and justified my stance, you however have responded by completely disregarding what I said and copy and pasting your previous post. I have reported you for your continued trolling of this thread.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I've addressed your "point" and justified my stance, you however have responded by completely disregarding what I said and copy and pasting your previous post. I have reported you for your continued trolling of this thread.
You calling it superficial damage doesn't change the fact that Thor in fact did cause Mangog damage, which in turn makes your earlier claim a lie.
No amount of backtracking is going to change the fact that I caught you lying.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You calling it superficial damage doesn't change the fact that Thor in fact did cause Mangog damage, which in turn makes your earlier claim a lie.No amount of backtracking is going to change the fact that I caught you lying.
"He couldn't do shit" isn't clinical terminology. Why you've decided to get into semantic debate over what constitutes "shit" and whether or not "shit" was in fact actually done, is mind boggling. I said he couldn't do shit, by which I meant he couldn't do any damage worth talking about, and he couldn't. You keep crying "He broke his horn!" So what? It was a superficial, cosmetic "injury." It amounts to essentially nothing. Why you've decided this is the issue you are going to flame and troll over in thread that was close for four years, and already has a mod warning is beyond my understanding.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
"He couldn't do shit" isn't clinical terminology. Why you've decided to get into semantic debate over what constitutes "shit" and whether or not "shit" was in fact actually done, is mind boggling. I said he couldn't do shit, by which I meant he couldn't do any damage worth talking about, and he couldn't. You keep crying "He broke his horn!" So what? It was a superficial, cosmetic "injury." It amounts to essentially nothing. Why you've decided this is the issue you are going to flame and troll over in thread that was close for four years, and already has a mod warning is beyond my understanding.
You claimed that Thor "couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability", seeing as Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to break off a body part, your statement was obviously incorrect.
BTW, seeing as you knew Thor did damage(even if you only considered it superficial ) means that you knowingly made an incorrect statement, IOW you lied.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You claimed that Thor "couldn't do shit to his outward invulnerability", seeing as Thor overcame Mangog's invulnerability enough to break off a body part, your statement was obviously incorrect.BTW, seeing as you knew Thor did damage(even if you only considered it superficial ) means that you knowingly made an incorrect statement, IOW you lied.
No, I was right Thor couldn't do shit to Mangog. There is nothing misleading or inaccurate about anything I said. You've merely decide to grasp at straws, because really it's all you can really do at this point, lacking the dignity or self respect to step out such as you do.