Denton Van Zan (Reign of Fire) vs. John McClane

Started by quanchi112112 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
That was after he let her live while unconscious.

Anyhow, maths is still there, 4 > 0 and 3 > 0. Unless you have something for Van Zan?

The majority of all but maybe a fight or a few McClane needs a weapon or stupidity on his enemies part to win. Zan wins. McClane relies on his guns to take people out due to being a pushover.

Originally posted by Robtard
That was after he let her live while unconscious.

Anyhow, maths is still there, 4 > 0 and 3 > 0. Unless you have something for Van Zan?

And how would he have killed her? Make her fall down a flight of stairs, breaking her neck? Mac doesn't break necks with his hands like Riggs does, Champ.

He gave her his best and in the end it was not enough. Accept it.

McClane is pretty low on the totem pole of action heroes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
McClane is pretty low on the totem pole of action heroes.
Did you really just say that?

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
And how would he have killed her? Make her fall down a flight of stairs, breaking her neck? Mac doesn't break necks with his hands like Riggs does, Champ.

He gave her his best and in the end it was not enough. Accept it.

Could have gotten the gun and shot her. That's a pretty good way of killing someone. Except for the neck he broke with his hands in DH4.0.

Van Zan = 0. By your rules. Agreed?

Originally posted by quanchi112
The majority of all but maybe a fight or a few McClane needs a weapon or stupidity on his enemies part to win. Zan wins. McClane relies on his guns to take people out due to being a pushover.

Van Zan has zero wins by these rules. You can't win with zero feats.

Originally posted by Robtard
Could have gotten the gun and shot her. That's a pretty good way of killing someone. Except for the neck he broke with his hands in DH4.0.

Van Zan = 0. By your rules. Agreed?

He should have skull ****ed her when he downed her.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
Did you really just say that?
Absolutely.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Absolutely.
So incredibly wrong, you are.

Originally posted by Robtard
Van Zan has zero wins by these rules. You can't win with zero feats.
He was dominating and needed to be pulled off. Zan doesn't need a gun to beat someone up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He was dominating and needed to be pulled off. Zan doesn't need a gun to beat someone up.

So you agree Van Zan doesn't even have a single h2h win. He just had the upperhand until the fight was stopped and Quinn was fully ready and willing to start again.

You can't win a h2h fight with zero h2h feats. Sorry.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
So incredibly wrong, you are.
He's a joke when it comes to hand to hand.

Originally posted by Robtard
So you agree Van Zan doesn't even have a single h2h win. He just had the upperhand until the fight was stopped and Quinn was fully ready and willing to start again.

You can't win a h2h fight with zero h2h feats. Sorry.

Yes, you can. Zan was portrayed as mega uber in hand to hand whereas McClane needs a gun handy to even have a chance.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, you can. Zan was portrayed as mega uber in hand to hand whereas McClane needs a gun handy to even have a chance.

"Mega uber" would be a guy who can seriously damage someone with a headbutt and 5 mounted/weight-behind punches. Van Zan couldn't.

It's settled, Van Zan doesn't have a single h2h win. McClane wins with his feats. Cry now.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Mega uber" would be a guy who can seriously damage someone with a headbutt and 5 mounted/weight-behind punches. Van Zan couldn't.

It's settled, Van Zan doesn't have a single h2h win. McClane wins with his feats. Cry now.

McClane in five movies only has a few suspect wins over scrub characters without stupidity or weapon aids. Zan wins. Higher portrayal. Move on, tard.

Originally posted by quanchi112
McClane in five movies only has a few suspect wins over scrub characters without stupidity or weapon aids. Zan wins. Higher portrayal. Move on, tard.

LoL. Special Forces soldiers and professional mercenaries are not "scrubs". Try again.

Van Zan can't even put down a non trained guy with 6 hits. Zero h2h feats, this is the platform you're debating from. Cry more.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL. Special Forces soldiers and professional mercenaries are not "scrubs". Try again.

Van Zan can't even put down a non trained guy with 6 hits. Zero h2h feats, this is the platform you're debating from. Cry more.

A woman who destroyed him is a scrub. She owned him.

Star of movie>>>>Scrub woman who disarmed and crushed McClane.

McClane has never taken down someone of Quinn's level in H2H. I need to see screenfeats proving the combat prowess of the guy who McClane neck-snapped in DH4, and the bystander in DH5 who he KOed. Until I see screenfeats proving they are as skilled as Quinn in H2H, I'll be forced to assume they're as harmless as cotton balls.

Originally posted by Lestov16
McClane has never taken down someone of Quinn's level in H2H. I need to see screenfeats proving the combat prowess of the guy who McClane neck-snapped in DH4, and the bystander in DH5 who he KOed. Until I see screenfeats proving they are as skilled as Quinn in H2H, I'll be forced to assume they're as harmless as cotton balls.

You keep dodging this:

Originally posted by Robtard
You keep bringing this up without ever quantifying it.

What exactly are Van Zan's and Quinn's "levels"? Considering the only fight we ever see them in is against each other, it's nothing more than a few blows and it's broken up.

And lol at "proving they are as skilled as Quinn in H2H", Quinn was completely untrained by all accounts.

But please, do quantify what "levels" Van Zan and Quinn are at?

What level is the guy who McClane necksnapped or KOed at? You keep saying that McClane has beaten tougher opponents than Quinn, but can't show how they are tougher.