Thor VS The Gorgon (In a Sword Fight)

Started by Dum Dum Dugan15 pages

Originally posted by leonidas
you keep saying that... so.... WHY is it so unlikely?? logan's too fast to hit? thor can't stagger him and put him on the ground with a blow?? thor can't keep him down long enough to pound him?? i'm ASKING you.

Because it simply not likely. Almost no one has gotten him into positions like that in straight up fights. Thor can with out a doubt beat Wolverine, i just find it unlikely he will do so by getting Wolverine to stay down long enough for overhanned double handed chop. Wolverine quick and the scenerio be difficult to pull off against guy who small, very skilled and extremely fast and agile. Now Thor can get him down for sure, I just think he more likey get him down after a brawl. I don't think he could just hit him like that right off the batt, if he got logan into that position it because the fight was all but already over.

Originally posted by leonidas

man, stop being so defensive. i'm NOT arguing with you, i'm trying to figure out why you think it's so unlikely for thor to get logan in a compromising position.

I think it unlikely he get him into that position not a compromising position.

I not being defensive, your simply pushing an arguement onto me, that I simply have no wish in argueing about, and yet you keep pushing it. You read my post an inferred more then what it intended and now your trying to argue with me about thor capabilities in putting down wolverine, which i never doubt nor wished to debate.

Originally posted by leonidas

and again, YOU jumped on the scan. the little whistler guy was meant to indicate i was half-joking. srank seems to have understood (since he has done his damndest to ignore all my posts.... bastich) the tongue-in-cheek nature of the scan. but now you have made a statement and it falls on you to defend or clarify it. or don't, it doesn't really matter that much to me.....

I dident jump on anything. Yur making it sound like I attacked your scann. Your turing this into something more then it was. I responded because it was inaccurate response to what Srank was argueing. What is there to defend? I stated several times why I made the arguement. i don't know what more you want or what your even looking for. Honestly think you believe my post was in reference to much more then it was. It was a simple statement, ment to be taken for what it was, I not trying to inferr anything more or less.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Because it simply not likely. Almost no one has gotten him into positions like that in straight up fights. Thor can with out a doubt beat Wolverine, i just find it unlikely he will do so by getting Wolverine to stay down long enough for overhanned double handed chop. Wolverine quick and the scenerio be difficult to pull off against guy who small, very skilled and extremely fast and agile. Now Thor can get him down for sure, I just think he more likey get him down after a brawl. I don't think he could just hit him like that right off the batt, if he got logan into that position it because the fight was all but already over.

I think it unlikely he get him into that position not a compromising position.

I not being defensive, your simply pushing an arguement onto me, that I simply have no wish in argueing about, and yet you keep pushing it. You read my post an inferred more then what it intended and now your trying to argue with me about thor capabilities in putting down wolverine, which i never doubt nor wished to debate.

I dident jump on anything. Yur making it sound like I attacked your scann. Your turing this into something more then it was. I responded because it was inaccurate response to what Srank was argueing. What is there to defend? I stated several times why I made the arguement. i don't know what more you want or what your even looking for. Honestly think you believe my post was in reference to much more then it was. It was a simple statement, ment to be taken for what it was, I not trying to inferr anything more or less.

fair enough.

Thor can't one shot Wolverine with a punch. Not on average at least. Logan is pretty tough.

With Mjolnir? It goes from possible to the only logical conclusion depending on how much power he places behind his blow.

Originally posted by Ize19
In Wolverine Origins 41, Banner confidently tells Skaar that he can't kill Wolverine. Skaar takes that as a challenge, and intentionally delivers what he intends to be a killing blow to the top of Wolverine's skull. Wolverine isn't even knocked out, and this is Wolverine as written by Daniel Way. The idea that the only reason Wolverine isn't knocked out by top tier bricks is because they hold back is just... laughable 😬

We've been told twice that Hulk can't kill Wolverine, once that they could fight all day, and once that they could fight for an "eternity."

You got to love how some posters just arbitrarily decide that it doesn't make any sense for Wolverine to take the best shots from Marvel's bricks and ignore it even though he has been doing it for decades. I wonder how it would fly happen if I arbitrarily decided that Thor was too powerful for an Asgardian and that I was going to disregard all of his feats and just decided he was as powerful as Hogun? I bet that wouldn't fly, and yet is perfectly reasonable to do with Wolverine.

yep, pretty much what i was getting at earlier....

Originally posted by leonidas
fair enough.

You son of a butch, I wright all that an you respond with two words I gunna 😠

jk 😆

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I already gave you evidence from the comic, now show me where it is stated that Wolverine is almost out.

You're a liar.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're a liar.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
You're a liar.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
You son of a butch, I wright all that an you respond with two words I gunna 😠

jk 😆

well, you answered my question. 🙂

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're a liar.

You're a liar.

It's frustrating when someone refuses to acknowledge what is obvious happening on panel, but instead ask to be provided with an on panel narrative statement confirming said obvious conclusion that they know doesn't exist, isn't it? That's your debate (read: troll) style, everyone can do it, you are just the only one who does.

If I'm a liar, show the scan/quote that states Wolverine is tired or not at 100%.

If I'm a liar, show the scan/quote that states Wolverine was almost knocked out.

I'm waiting.

lol

I'm waiting.

FYI, I'm going to keep counter trolling you until you stop trolling.

Originally posted by wildernesss
lol

Wolverine fanboys are funny.

Thor fanboys are funny.

worst part about this is, that silent is dead serous.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
worst part about this is, that silent is dead serous.

Originally posted by leonidas
thor fought hulk because he thought he could win. if he knows he's fighting a telepath with a sword that can cut anything and he himself hasn't used a sword in a very long time, i hardly think it out of character to use his physical advantages. but continue to tell everyone how he would simply agree to stand there and be cut down into pieces. you're very convincing. 😄

thor has used his hammer to block everything from bullets to lasers to tp attacks from no less than phoenix. his reaction times are FAR from baseless and i've already proven how fast he can move if he needs to. that speed feat i posted is likely>any gorgon speed feat.

his ability to react would be wholly dependent upon the writer. for all your cries (a classic) that logan was faster, it is an indisputable fact that he CAUGHT logan. language and actions contradict in that issue and you will accept whichever side happens to make your fave look better. fact is, if thor proved capable of keeping up with gorgon, it would hardly be shocking given some of his uber reaction feats. if you'd stop riding gorgon's sac and stop trying to relegate thor to an imbecile incapable of doing anything more than standing there, you might understand that he DOES have options, that a swordfight MAY not be as one-sided as you think (especially given thor's damage soak) and that this 'absolute' stance of yours is narrow-minded, childish and ignorant of the facts. learn about a character before you try and dismiss and debate him.

he fights hulk like that because he is arrogant and he likes to brawl it out, he will find it very shameful for a god to be afraid of some meta so he will try to defeat gorgon straight up like he always does against all his foes and specially if its some meta thor will be enraged with the thought he should try and avoid some human

again how is thor being able to finally grab logan proves he is not inferior to logan in tearms of speed? logan was able to inflict several shots at thor without any answer , wolverine proved to be faster as was stated by thor himself and also as was stated by thor himself he couldnt keep going like that so he had to use his lightning ... but i guess thor fans just love to avoid any proof that contredict them and you grasp on straws such as "thor being able to finally grab wolverine after getting tooled" 😆

i find it very funny how you mention thors damage soak since its not blunt force or something like that its cutting... and as far as cutting thor proved to be easily injured and cut by wolverine claws and we are talking here about a blade more powerful than the godslayer which is a skyfather weapon that slay gods so this statement is just ignorant , in fact its you who is acting like some spoiled brat that moans and cry when ever things wont go your way, on panel proof say wolverine is faster - wolverine is inferior to gorgon in every single way by much - gorgon got all the abilities to take thor out in this fight, thor is dead now deal with it you brat