Originally posted by leonidas
you keep saying that... so.... WHY is it so unlikely?? logan's too fast to hit? thor can't stagger him and put him on the ground with a blow?? thor can't keep him down long enough to pound him?? i'm ASKING you.
Because it simply not likely. Almost no one has gotten him into positions like that in straight up fights. Thor can with out a doubt beat Wolverine, i just find it unlikely he will do so by getting Wolverine to stay down long enough for overhanned double handed chop. Wolverine quick and the scenerio be difficult to pull off against guy who small, very skilled and extremely fast and agile. Now Thor can get him down for sure, I just think he more likey get him down after a brawl. I don't think he could just hit him like that right off the batt, if he got logan into that position it because the fight was all but already over.
Originally posted by leonidas
man, stop being so defensive. i'm NOT arguing with you, i'm trying to figure out why you think it's so unlikely for thor to get logan in a compromising position.
I think it unlikely he get him into that position not a compromising position.
I not being defensive, your simply pushing an arguement onto me, that I simply have no wish in argueing about, and yet you keep pushing it. You read my post an inferred more then what it intended and now your trying to argue with me about thor capabilities in putting down wolverine, which i never doubt nor wished to debate.
Originally posted by leonidas
and again, YOU jumped on the scan. the little whistler guy was meant to indicate i was half-joking. srank seems to have understood (since he has done his damndest to ignore all my posts.... bastich) the tongue-in-cheek nature of the scan. but now you have made a statement and it falls on you to defend or clarify it. or don't, it doesn't really matter that much to me.....
I dident jump on anything. Yur making it sound like I attacked your scann. Your turing this into something more then it was. I responded because it was inaccurate response to what Srank was argueing. What is there to defend? I stated several times why I made the arguement. i don't know what more you want or what your even looking for. Honestly think you believe my post was in reference to much more then it was. It was a simple statement, ment to be taken for what it was, I not trying to inferr anything more or less.