Thor VS The Gorgon (In a Sword Fight)

Started by leonidas15 pages
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
See thats were I disagree, think Wolverine would simply dodge it. Idea Thor landing a two handed shot like that on Wolverine seems doubtful to me.

so you're arguing that (a) thor can't hit him with a shot, and (b) if he DID hit him with a hammer blow he couldn't even stagger him, and (c) if he did stagger him, thor is too slow to follow up the attack with another one?

yep, we disagree all right.

Which leaves him self open and eiser to dodge, please have thor use that stratagy and tell me how that works out for him.

huh? having 2 hands on the hammer somehow is slower? tell that to every tennis player in the world.... and as i said, i single-handed blow as laid out bill.

what blanket statements did I make?

not you, srank.

Originally posted by cdtm
..why are we talking about Wolverine vs Hulk, instead of Thor vs Gorgon..?

Because Gorgon is a Wolverine foe so naturally Wolverine gets dragged into this argument because Wolverine fought Thor.

Originally posted by cdtm
Pak established Banner always kept Hulk from killing anyone.. He doesn't even kill his worst enemies, why would he try and kill Wolverine?

Hulk foughten Wolverine more times then anyone else, wolverine in many ways was one of his worst enemies.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Because Gorgon is a Wolverine foe so naturally Wolverine gets dragged into this argument because Wolverine fought Thor.

😂

duh. in the immortal words of brett the retard favre--i'm more surprised it took so long.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The fact that he needed to be saved and that even a few panels later he still had little air bubbles floating around his head.

Like the fact that Wolverine's healing factor suffers from diminishing returns, and weakens the more he uses it? And how in IG he was fighting nonstop against many other characters in many other battles both before and after Wonder Man ambushed him and was unable to ko him? Like those facts?

But I'm being purposely obtuse and copying your debate style to show you what a knob you can be. So show me where it says Wolverine was almost out. If it wasn't stated, I guess it didn't happen. That's how you like to operate, correct?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
It means Hulk, for all his rage and bluster, wasn't trying to kill Logan or anyone else according to Pak. Which means, no, Logan wasn't tanking Hulk's "best blows".

that's completely illogical & totally wrong. Hulk isn't capable of killing logan with blunt force trauma; even hulk's "best blows" would not kill logan, therefore hulk would have NEVER held back against logan. banner
knew logan was nigh invincible. Fail.

The evidence I listed came from the comic where the fight happened, show me where in that comic Wolverine was stated to be tired or not at 100%

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
It means Hulk, for all his rage and bluster, wasn't trying to kill Logan or anyone else according to Pak. Which means, no, Logan wasn't tanking Hulk's "best blows".

He was tanking as good a blows as Hulk had ever given up until then which wa sbeyond pretty much anyone else. So again how does that invalidate them? By your logic, almost no one has ever taking on Wolverine finest blows including Thor.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The evidence I listed came from the comic where the fight happened, show me where in that comic Wolverine was stated to be tired or not at 100%

The evidence I listed came from the comic and overarching even the fight took place in. Show me in the comic where it stated Wolverine was almost out.

See everyone can troll like you. I'm swacking your troll method bro.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
The evidence I listed came from the comic and overarching even the fight took place in. Show me in the comic where it stated Wolverine was almost out.

See everyone can troll like you. I'm swacking your troll method bro.

Show me where in that comic Wolverine was stated to be tired or not at 100%

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
It means Hulk, for all his rage and bluster, wasn't trying to kill Logan or anyone else according to Pak. Which means, no, Logan wasn't tanking Hulk's "best blows".

Hulk can't kill Wolverine, ipso facto he never had to hold back. From the mouth of Hulk himself. 😎

Originally posted by Silent Master
Show me where in that comic Wolverine was stated to be tired or not at 100%

Show me in the comic where it stated Wolverine was almost out.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The evidence I listed came from the comic where the fight happened, show me where in that comic Wolverine was stated to be tired or not at 100%

Never said he was tired, said he was weaken as in not 100%. That becuase he had been fighting all day. It does not need to be stated, it was shown on pannel in the arc. You clearly never read the issue. It very clear the heros had been fighting many of them all day. So wait we assume they are all at 100% even wehn we see them taking damage and getting beat up in the fights? But unless it stated we assume there at 100%. Is that really what your trying to ****ing argue? Oh please say yes, because I will enjoy so much ripping into you.

you stated no evidence, in fact you stated nonsense, like Wonderman was hold back, which is false nd any smuck who has actaully read the issue knows that. so much for your facts, chump.

Originally posted by wildernesss
that's completely illogical & totally wrong. Hulk isn't capable of killing logan with blunt force trauma; even hulk's "best blows" would not kill logan, therefore hulk would have NEVER held back against logan. banner
knew logan was nigh invincible. Fail.

Tell that to Pak.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Tell that to Pak.

Even assuming we take Hulk's boisterous statement at face value, that doesn't mean he was operating at a lower level then previously thought in all his previous showings, it means there was a potential higher level that he was purposely not going to... and considering he is the Hulk and his whole deal is he has no limit on his potential strength, we all already know that...

Originally posted by leonidas
so you're arguing that (a) thor can't hit him with a shot, and (b) if he DID hit him with a hammer blow he couldn't even stagger him, and (c) if he did stagger him, thor is too slow to follow up the attack with another one?

No im am nit argueing all those things, s stop projecting arguements I not making onto me. I hate that style of debating. I argueing that the scan you posted is not a likely scenerio for thor to get into against Wolverine. And mainly that was not scenerio srank was discussing when he suggest that it take dozen hits from Thor to put Wolverine down

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Tell that to Pak.

it's irrelevant since hulk cannot kill logan in this way. Gladiator has feats which surpass hulk's & he could not KO logan.

So every blow he was throwing at Logan was a "planet buster", then?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Show me in the comic where it stated Wolverine was almost out.

I already gave you evidence from that comic, it's your turn.

Now, Show me where in that comic Wolverine was stated to be tired or not at 100%

Originally posted by wildernesss
it's irrelevant since hulk cannot kill logan in this way. Gladiator has feats which surpass hulk's & he could not KO logan.

Hulk > Gladiator.

And Gladiator was rocking Logan with planetoid busting attacks now?