Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't make the claim rob did so he has to do so.
LoL, you just dodged Ninjaks question and tried to blame-shift, classic troll move. You in fact did make the claim that it's a different universe FIRST.
No worries, your concession was accepted, everyone here knows you're not good at backing up what you say.
Originally posted by the ninjakI honestly am astonished you'd argue for this. It's the same overall general setting but with that being said just because each movie takes place on a fictional modern day earth setting that doesn't mean each character exists somewhere else during each movie's respective history. By your logic Biff Tannen and everyone from practically every movie exists which predates Reign of Fire. It's so absurd I am shocked.
He made a different claim. You must also prove yours.Happy waged his war on Golf in 1996. Reign of Fire is based 20 years after the present time of the films release, which was 2002.
Take comics for instance dc and marvel decides what's in continuity we don't just assume everything does just like with Reign of Fire. You can't say oh yeah Happy was winning golf tournaments pre Dragon attacks.
Originally posted by RobtardBecause it's common sense. If you want to prove it's the same universe it's on you. We don't assume every movie exists within the same kind of universe if you claim it you must prove it.
LoL, you just dodged Ninjaks question and tried to blame-shift, classic troll move. You in fact did make the claim that it's a different universe FIRST.No worries, your concession was accepted, everyone here knows you're not good at backing up what you say.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I honestly am astonished you'd argue for this. It's the same overall general setting but with that being said just because each movie takes place on a fictional modern day earth setting that doesn't mean each character exists somewhere else during each movie's respective history. By your logic Biff Tannen and everyone from practically every movie exists which predates Reign of Fire. It's so absurd I am shocked.
Robocop vs Terminator.
Alien vs Predator.
Freddy vs Jason.
Proof that the idea of two different franchises can coexist simply because someone wrote it.
Are you denying Bob Barker existed before the Dragons attacked?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Because it's common sense. If you want to prove it's the same universe it's on you. We don't assume every movie exists within the same kind of universe if you claim it you must prove it.
Common sense when two films are very opposing to each other, these two aren't; there's no reason to believe that Happy Gilmore didn't exist in America at the same time Quinn existed(as a very young child) in England in the same Earth/Universe. So since your point of view is going against logic and reason, it's on you to prove it.
So prove it, or STFU.